How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?” Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...
How to Merge Multiple Columns in to Two Columns based on Column 1 Value?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
What is a non-alternating simple group with big order, but relatively few conjugacy classes?
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
Apollo command module space walk?
porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Coloring maths inside a tcolorbox
Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?
Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems
Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
What to do with chalk when deepwater soloing?
What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?”
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do you develop a solid hiring workflow?Should I mention to have been previously “rejected”?Laid off 3 months into first job out of college. How to present this to prospective employers?Looking for a new job while under contractHow to answer questions about desired salary?Is it appropriate to mention how long you've been applying at the same company?How can I find out whether I have a blot on my HR record?How to handle interview questions about job on which I was unfairly terminated?How to explain why I know the company's employee conditions?Fraudulent job applications with no discernible purpose. Have you ever seen them? Any idea of the motive?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"
I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.
I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.
On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.
I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.
I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources
|
show 3 more comments
I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"
I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.
I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.
On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.
I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.
I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources
3
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
3
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
1
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
2
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"
I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.
I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.
On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.
I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.
I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources
I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"
I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.
I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then and I'm a different person now.
On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.
I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.
I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources
interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources
edited 3 hours ago
Wes Sayeed
asked 7 hours ago
Wes SayeedWes Sayeed
7981410
7981410
3
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
3
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
1
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
2
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
3
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
1
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
2
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago
3
3
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
3
3
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
1
1
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
2
2
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.
The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.
This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry, irrational or not, that someone someday will find out.
If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.
There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.
I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.
A company who would reject you based on that answer (or outsource that rejection power to an automated process) is probably not one you'd want to work for.
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.
By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?
Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?
Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.
Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
add a comment |
To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options
Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
like an interview where you can be personable.
Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.
The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.
If it makes you uncomfortable:
- Tell the truth
- Explain the best that you can
- Hope for the best.
Good luck to you :)
add a comment |
I did get fired from a job back in 1998... I've recently been laid off
from a job I've had for 10 years
How to answer the question: "Have you ever been terminated or asked to
resign from a position in the past?"
Thus, the correct answer to the question is "Yes. I was fired once over 20 years ago while still a teenager. And I was recently laid off after an acquisition."
You could then go on to explain how you have grown since your early years. Most interviewers will understand that.
add a comment |
It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?
I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.
To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?
One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?
Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?
{After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".}
Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
"You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")
Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?
The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.
Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
Simply, No you will not.
You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.
It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.
The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.
This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry, irrational or not, that someone someday will find out.
If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.
There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.
I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.
A company who would reject you based on that answer (or outsource that rejection power to an automated process) is probably not one you'd want to work for.
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.
The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.
This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry, irrational or not, that someone someday will find out.
If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.
There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.
I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.
A company who would reject you based on that answer (or outsource that rejection power to an automated process) is probably not one you'd want to work for.
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.
The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.
This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry, irrational or not, that someone someday will find out.
If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.
There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.
I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.
A company who would reject you based on that answer (or outsource that rejection power to an automated process) is probably not one you'd want to work for.
It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.
The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.
This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry, irrational or not, that someone someday will find out.
If this was a question about work history, I would definitely omit that job since it was so long ago, but that's not what the question is asking.
There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.
I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.
A company who would reject you based on that answer (or outsource that rejection power to an automated process) is probably not one you'd want to work for.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
mcknzmcknz
19.6k86380
19.6k86380
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
6
6
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later
– George M
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
"Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.
– TehShrike
4 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
@WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.
– mcknz
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
"In my experience companies usually take context into consideration" Are you saying that in your experience, hiring managers DO actually read and consider the explanation you provide?
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.
By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?
Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?
Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.
Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
add a comment |
It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.
By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?
Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?
Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.
Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
add a comment |
It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.
By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?
Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?
Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.
Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.
It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.
By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?
Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?
Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.
Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.
answered 5 hours ago
John SpiegelJohn Spiegel
1,16729
1,16729
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
add a comment |
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.
– thursdaysgeek
4 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
@thursdaysgeek; That could be true, but only if an actual human reads it and not a robot that sends applications to the automatic "circular file" for certain pre-programmed red flags.
– Wes Sayeed
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
The fact that there's a 400 letter text box suggests that, under ideal circumstances at least, it would be read by a human. It won't necessarily be someone who gives it more than a cursory skim though, so get the important facts in up front.
– Matthew Barber
3 hours ago
add a comment |
To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options
Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
like an interview where you can be personable.
Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.
The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.
If it makes you uncomfortable:
- Tell the truth
- Explain the best that you can
- Hope for the best.
Good luck to you :)
add a comment |
To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options
Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
like an interview where you can be personable.
Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.
The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.
If it makes you uncomfortable:
- Tell the truth
- Explain the best that you can
- Hope for the best.
Good luck to you :)
add a comment |
To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options
Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
like an interview where you can be personable.
Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.
The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.
If it makes you uncomfortable:
- Tell the truth
- Explain the best that you can
- Hope for the best.
Good luck to you :)
To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options
Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
like an interview where you can be personable.
Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.
The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.
If it makes you uncomfortable:
- Tell the truth
- Explain the best that you can
- Hope for the best.
Good luck to you :)
answered 4 hours ago
CrazyPasteCrazyPaste
55729
55729
add a comment |
add a comment |
I did get fired from a job back in 1998... I've recently been laid off
from a job I've had for 10 years
How to answer the question: "Have you ever been terminated or asked to
resign from a position in the past?"
Thus, the correct answer to the question is "Yes. I was fired once over 20 years ago while still a teenager. And I was recently laid off after an acquisition."
You could then go on to explain how you have grown since your early years. Most interviewers will understand that.
add a comment |
I did get fired from a job back in 1998... I've recently been laid off
from a job I've had for 10 years
How to answer the question: "Have you ever been terminated or asked to
resign from a position in the past?"
Thus, the correct answer to the question is "Yes. I was fired once over 20 years ago while still a teenager. And I was recently laid off after an acquisition."
You could then go on to explain how you have grown since your early years. Most interviewers will understand that.
add a comment |
I did get fired from a job back in 1998... I've recently been laid off
from a job I've had for 10 years
How to answer the question: "Have you ever been terminated or asked to
resign from a position in the past?"
Thus, the correct answer to the question is "Yes. I was fired once over 20 years ago while still a teenager. And I was recently laid off after an acquisition."
You could then go on to explain how you have grown since your early years. Most interviewers will understand that.
I did get fired from a job back in 1998... I've recently been laid off
from a job I've had for 10 years
How to answer the question: "Have you ever been terminated or asked to
resign from a position in the past?"
Thus, the correct answer to the question is "Yes. I was fired once over 20 years ago while still a teenager. And I was recently laid off after an acquisition."
You could then go on to explain how you have grown since your early years. Most interviewers will understand that.
answered 2 hours ago
Joe StrazzereJoe Strazzere
255k1317431054
255k1317431054
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?
I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.
To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?
One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?
Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?
{After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".}
Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
"You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")
Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?
The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.
Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
Simply, No you will not.
You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.
It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?
I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.
To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?
One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?
Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?
{After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".}
Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
"You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")
Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?
The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.
Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
Simply, No you will not.
You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.
It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?
I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.
To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?
One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?
Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?
{After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".}
Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
"You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")
Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?
The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.
Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
Simply, No you will not.
You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.
It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.
It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?
I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.
To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?
One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?
Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?
{After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".}
Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
"You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")
Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?
Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?
The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.
Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?
Simply, No you will not.
You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"
If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?
It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.
It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
FattieFattie
14.3k62545
14.3k62545
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
2
2
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.
– Wes Sayeed
5 hours ago
1
1
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!
– Fattie
5 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box
– George M
4 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
@GeorgeM is it common practice to comment on answers without having read the question?
– Alex M
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
Incidentally, the use of terminate in the sense of "to dismiss from a job" dates back to at least 1973, according to dictionary.com.
– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.
– newguy
7 hours ago
3
I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.
– NotMe
7 hours ago
1
You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.
– David K
7 hours ago
finding work was pitifully easy then! :)
– Fattie
6 hours ago
2
Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.
– Fattie
6 hours ago