erasing a part of a plothow to draw part of the picture to be line and the other part to be the “leadsto”...

How would a aircraft visually signal in distress?

Translating 'Liber'

Version 2 - print new even-length arrays from two arrays

Efficient integer floor function in C++

How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?

PL/SQL function to receive a number and return its binary format

Print the string equivalents of a phone number

Does there exist a word to express a male who behaves as a female?

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

Why does Kathryn say this in 12 Monkeys?

Phone number to a lounge, or lounges generally

Java guess the number

Is it recommended against to open-source the code of a webapp?

SF novella separating the dumb majority from the intelligent part of mankind

What is the purpose of building foundations?

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

Is this half mask suitable for spray painting?

What can plausibly explain many of my very long and low-tech bridges?

Required to check-in in person at international layover airport

Can an Eldritch Knight use Action Surge and thus Arcane Charge even when surprised?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

Notation of last measure of a song with a pickup measure

Do the English have an ancient (obsolete) verb for the action of the book opening?

From the list of 3-tuples, how can I select tuples which contain one for more nines?



erasing a part of a plot


how to draw part of the picture to be line and the other part to be the “leadsto” symbolWhat is the easiest way to plot a function and its tangent lines at the turning points?Packages to plot functions such as the logistic function (or “S-shaped function”)?x axis domain/range in a plotTikZ: a cylinder of infinite heightEquivalent to “shorten <=” for intermediate points3D point plot - visualizationHow to plot linear histograms with Latex?Simple tikz picture, a line connecting nodesPlacing numbers at the above and right side of the plot frame













3















How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{expl3}
ExplSyntaxOn
int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
ExplSyntaxOff
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,positioning}
usepackage{pgfplots}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
pagestyle{empty}
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}









share|improve this question





























    3















    How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



    documentclass{standalone}
    usepackage{expl3}
    ExplSyntaxOn
    int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
    ExplSyntaxOff
    usepackage{amsmath}
    usepackage{amssymb}
    usepackage{graphicx}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,positioning}
    usepackage{pgfplots}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}
    begin{document}
    newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
    pagestyle{empty}
    centering
    begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
    draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
    draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
    draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}









    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3








      How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



      documentclass{standalone}
      usepackage{expl3}
      ExplSyntaxOn
      int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
      ExplSyntaxOff
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      usepackage{graphicx}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,positioning}
      usepackage{pgfplots}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}
      begin{document}
      newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
      pagestyle{empty}
      centering
      begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
      draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
      draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
      draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}









      share|improve this question
















      How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



      documentclass{standalone}
      usepackage{expl3}
      ExplSyntaxOn
      int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
      ExplSyntaxOff
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      usepackage{graphicx}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,positioning}
      usepackage{pgfplots}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}
      begin{document}
      newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
      pagestyle{empty}
      centering
      begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
      draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
      draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
      draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}






      tikz-pgf plot






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 9 hours ago









      Torbjørn T.

      160k13263451




      160k13263451










      asked 9 hours ago









      Amir Amir

      1405




      1405






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



          I understand that you looking for something like this:



          enter image description here



          With use of clip function:



          documentclass[margin=3mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{pgfplots}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows,
          calc,
          positioning,
          shapes}
          begin{document}
          newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
          pagestyle{empty}
          centering
          begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
          clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
          draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
          draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
          draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
          draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
          node[below right] at (1,5.1) {$uparrowinfty$};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            8 hours ago



















          4














          I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



          documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
          draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
          draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
          begin{scope}
          clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
          draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
          plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
          end{scope}
          draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=box and curve}]
          ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here



          With pgfplots it would be much easier.



          documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
          usepackage{pgfplots}
          pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          begin{axis}[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
          xmin=-2,xmax=45]
          addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
          very thick] {((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))};
          path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
          end{axis}
          draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=top and curve}]
          ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here



          Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493866%2ferasing-a-part-of-a-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usepackage{pgfplots}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes}
            begin{document}
            newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
            pagestyle{empty}
            centering
            begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) {$uparrowinfty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              8 hours ago
















            3














            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usepackage{pgfplots}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes}
            begin{document}
            newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
            pagestyle{empty}
            centering
            begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) {$uparrowinfty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              8 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usepackage{pgfplots}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes}
            begin{document}
            newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
            pagestyle{empty}
            centering
            begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) {$uparrowinfty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer















            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usepackage{pgfplots}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes}
            begin{document}
            newcommandddfrac[2]{frac{displaystyle #1}{displaystyle #2}}
            pagestyle{empty}
            centering
            begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) {$uparrowinfty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            ZarkoZarko

            136k872180




            136k872180













            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              8 hours ago



















            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              8 hours ago

















            Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            8 hours ago





            Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            8 hours ago











            4














            I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



            documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
            draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
            begin{scope}
            clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
            draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
            plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
            end{scope}
            draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=box and curve}]
            ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            enter image description here



            With pgfplots it would be much easier.



            documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
            usepackage{pgfplots}
            pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            begin{axis}[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
            xmin=-2,xmax=45]
            addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
            very thick] {((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))};
            path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
            end{axis}
            draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=top and curve}]
            ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            enter image description here



            Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer






























              4














              I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



              documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
              usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
              begin{document}
              begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
              draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
              draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
              begin{scope}
              clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
              draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
              plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
              end{scope}
              draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=box and curve}]
              ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}


              enter image description here



              With pgfplots it would be much easier.



              documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
              usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
              usepackage{pgfplots}
              pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
              begin{document}
              begin{tikzpicture}
              begin{axis}[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
              xmin=-2,xmax=45]
              addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
              very thick] {((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))};
              path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
              end{axis}
              draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=top and curve}]
              ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}


              enter image description here



              Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer




























                4












                4








                4







                I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
                draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
                draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
                begin{scope}
                clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
                draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
                plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
                end{scope}
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=box and curve}]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                With pgfplots it would be much easier.



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
                usepackage{pgfplots}
                pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                begin{axis}[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
                xmin=-2,xmax=45]
                addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
                very thick] {((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))};
                path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
                end{axis}
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=top and curve}]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer















                I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
                draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
                draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
                begin{scope}
                clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
                draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
                plot (x,{((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))});
                end{scope}
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=box and curve}]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                With pgfplots it would be much easier.



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                usetikzlibrary{positioning,intersections}
                usepackage{pgfplots}
                pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                begin{axis}[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
                xmin=-2,xmax=45]
                addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
                very thick] {((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))))};
                path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
                end{axis}
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections={of=top and curve}]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]{$infty$};
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 8 hours ago

























                answered 8 hours ago









                marmotmarmot

                132k6167318




                132k6167318






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493866%2ferasing-a-part-of-a-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                    Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                    Ciclooctatetraenă Vezi și | Bibliografie | Meniu de navigare637866text4148569-500570979m