Meaning of the negation in phrases like “не должен прочитать”What cases are used after...

Why does this quadratic expression have three zeroes?

Can the Mage Hand cantrip be used to trip an enemy who is running away?

Why weren't bootable game disks ever common on the IBM PC?

Would dual wielding daggers be a viable choice for a covert bodyguard?

Did the Vulgar Latin verb "toccare" exist?

What does (void *)1 mean

C program to parse source code of another language

Cops: The Hidden OEIS Substring

Graduate student with abysmal English writing skills, how to help

How did the hit man miss?

How to loop for 3 times in bash script when docker push fails?

What's the point of having a RAID 1 configuration over incremental backups to a secondary drive?

Is a request to book a business flight ticket for a graduate student an unreasonable one?

Do you know your 'KVZ's?

Print the last, middle and first character of your code

Why are they 'nude photos'?

RPI3B+: What are the four components below the HDMI connector called?

What prevents someone from claiming to be the murderer in order to get the real murderer off?

How to memorize multiple pieces?

For a hashing function like MD5, how similar can two plaintext strings be and still generate the same hash?

Why was hardware diversification an asset for the IBM PC ecosystem?

Are randomly-generated passwords starting with "a" less secure?

Managing and organizing the massively increased number of classes after switching to SOLID?

How were Martello towers supposed to work?



Meaning of the negation in phrases like “не должен прочитать”


What cases are used after negation? What are the rules?Can you provide two sentences that mean the same, but one sentence is formally a negation of another?Is “не должен (быть)” like “must not”Negation of feminine nouns in the accusative caseWhat is the different between “возвратиться” and “вернуться”?Are there truly “empty” perfectivizing prefixes in Russian? (aspectual clusters versus aspectual pairs)Can you use “едать” and “игрывать” in the present and future tenses?How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb “мочь”?The impossibly difficult modal “должен”How should I interpret phrases like “должен ли Путин уйти”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















I am often confused by phrases like "не должен прочитать," "не должен сделать," "не должен работать," "не должен платить" and so on. Sometimes the negation appears to refer to "должен," and sometimes - to the subsequent verb (i.e., to "прочитать" or whatever follows after "должен"). That is, I often get confused as to which interpretation is correct - "is not obliged to read" or "is obliged not to read."



My question is this: Is there any simple rule or trick to determine which verb is implied to be negated in phrases like "не должен прочитать"?



There might be some rule I am not aware of. Or should I always assume that both interpretations are possible unless one of them is excluded by the context?










share|improve this question





























    2















    I am often confused by phrases like "не должен прочитать," "не должен сделать," "не должен работать," "не должен платить" and so on. Sometimes the negation appears to refer to "должен," and sometimes - to the subsequent verb (i.e., to "прочитать" or whatever follows after "должен"). That is, I often get confused as to which interpretation is correct - "is not obliged to read" or "is obliged not to read."



    My question is this: Is there any simple rule or trick to determine which verb is implied to be negated in phrases like "не должен прочитать"?



    There might be some rule I am not aware of. Or should I always assume that both interpretations are possible unless one of them is excluded by the context?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2








      I am often confused by phrases like "не должен прочитать," "не должен сделать," "не должен работать," "не должен платить" and so on. Sometimes the negation appears to refer to "должен," and sometimes - to the subsequent verb (i.e., to "прочитать" or whatever follows after "должен"). That is, I often get confused as to which interpretation is correct - "is not obliged to read" or "is obliged not to read."



      My question is this: Is there any simple rule or trick to determine which verb is implied to be negated in phrases like "не должен прочитать"?



      There might be some rule I am not aware of. Or should I always assume that both interpretations are possible unless one of them is excluded by the context?










      share|improve this question














      I am often confused by phrases like "не должен прочитать," "не должен сделать," "не должен работать," "не должен платить" and so on. Sometimes the negation appears to refer to "должен," and sometimes - to the subsequent verb (i.e., to "прочитать" or whatever follows after "должен"). That is, I often get confused as to which interpretation is correct - "is not obliged to read" or "is obliged not to read."



      My question is this: Is there any simple rule or trick to determine which verb is implied to be negated in phrases like "не должен прочитать"?



      There might be some rule I am not aware of. Or should I always assume that both interpretations are possible unless one of them is excluded by the context?







      значения выражения глаголы отрицание






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      MitsukoMitsuko

      2,5211 gold badge12 silver badges43 bronze badges




      2,5211 gold badge12 silver badges43 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Usually (usually), imperfective means "should not be doing it":




          Он не должен это читать // He cannot be required to be reading this




          and perfective means "should be not doing it":




          Он не должен это прочитать // He is not allowed to read that.







          share|improve this answer
























          • Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

            – Mitsuko
            9 hours ago











          • I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

            – Mitsuko
            8 hours ago











          • @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

            – Quassnoi
            8 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "451"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frussian.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20196%2fmeaning-of-the-negation-in-phrases-like-%25d0%25bd%25d0%25b5-%25d0%25b4%25d0%25be%25d0%25bb%25d0%25b6%25d0%25b5%25d0%25bd-%25d0%25bf%25d1%2580%25d0%25be%25d1%2587%25d0%25b8%25d1%2582%25d0%25b0%25d1%2582%25d1%258c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Usually (usually), imperfective means "should not be doing it":




          Он не должен это читать // He cannot be required to be reading this




          and perfective means "should be not doing it":




          Он не должен это прочитать // He is not allowed to read that.







          share|improve this answer
























          • Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

            – Mitsuko
            9 hours ago











          • I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

            – Mitsuko
            8 hours ago











          • @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

            – Quassnoi
            8 hours ago
















          4














          Usually (usually), imperfective means "should not be doing it":




          Он не должен это читать // He cannot be required to be reading this




          and perfective means "should be not doing it":




          Он не должен это прочитать // He is not allowed to read that.







          share|improve this answer
























          • Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

            – Mitsuko
            9 hours ago











          • I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

            – Mitsuko
            8 hours ago











          • @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

            – Quassnoi
            8 hours ago














          4












          4








          4







          Usually (usually), imperfective means "should not be doing it":




          Он не должен это читать // He cannot be required to be reading this




          and perfective means "should be not doing it":




          Он не должен это прочитать // He is not allowed to read that.







          share|improve this answer













          Usually (usually), imperfective means "should not be doing it":




          Он не должен это читать // He cannot be required to be reading this




          and perfective means "should be not doing it":




          Он не должен это прочитать // He is not allowed to read that.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          QuassnoiQuassnoi

          34.7k2 gold badges55 silver badges131 bronze badges




          34.7k2 gold badges55 silver badges131 bronze badges













          • Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

            – Mitsuko
            9 hours ago











          • I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

            – Mitsuko
            8 hours ago











          • @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

            – Quassnoi
            8 hours ago



















          • Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

            – Mitsuko
            9 hours ago











          • I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

            – Mitsuko
            8 hours ago











          • @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

            – Quassnoi
            8 hours ago

















          Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

          – Mitsuko
          9 hours ago





          Ohh, so the key is in the aspect (perfective vs imperfective)! I had no idea it could be that simple.

          – Mitsuko
          9 hours ago













          I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

          – Mitsuko
          8 hours ago





          I just tried to recall numerous examples and feel that your rule is not universal. In particular, I recall something like "он не должен сейчас быть в университете, потому что сегодня выходной день." I now see two possible interpretations: (1) "He is not obliged to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." (2) "He is expected not to be in the university now, because today is a holiday." I am confused... This verb "должен" is already extremely tricky by itself, and now this ambiguity with the negation adds insult to injury...

          – Mitsuko
          8 hours ago













          @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

          – Quassnoi
          8 hours ago





          @Mitsuko: you're right, that's why I put the "usually" there twice.

          – Quassnoi
          8 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Russian Language Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frussian.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20196%2fmeaning-of-the-negation-in-phrases-like-%25d0%25bd%25d0%25b5-%25d0%25b4%25d0%25be%25d0%25bb%25d0%25b6%25d0%25b5%25d0%25bd-%25d0%25bf%25d1%2580%25d0%25be%25d1%2587%25d0%25b8%25d1%2582%25d0%25b0%25d1%2582%25d1%258c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

          The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

          Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...