How do I make an image of my entire USB flash drive?Is there a way to determine the optimal value for the bs...

Shifting tenses in the middle of narration

How should I write this passage to make it the most readable?

How did Arecibo detect methane lakes on Titan, and image Saturn's rings?

Why does the cable resistance jump from a low value to high value at a particular frequency?

Causal Diagrams using Wolfram?

Weird resistor with dots around it

Do I have to cite common CS algorithms?

If you know the location of an invisible creature, can you attack it?

Dogfights in outer space

How can I find an old paper when the usual methods fail?

Are those flyers about apartment purchase a scam?

Doesn't the speed of light limit imply the same electron can be annihilated twice?

Why did Saruman lie?

Are there any other rule mechanics that could grant Thieves' Cant?

Why is tert-butoxide often used in elimination reactions when it is not necessary?

Graphs for which a calculus student can reasonably compute the arclength

Is it possible to grow new organs through exposure to radioactivity?

A torrent of foreign terms

Identifying My Main Water Shutoff Valve / Setup

Running code generated in realtime in JavaScript with eval()

Why aren't rockets built with truss structures inside their fuel & oxidizer tanks to increase structural strength?

Installing Windows to flash BIOS, then reinstalling Ubuntu

What is a layman explanation for why the wavelength of light increases when space itself expands?

What is the hottest thing in the universe?



How do I make an image of my entire USB flash drive?


Is there a way to determine the optimal value for the bs parameter to dd?Where are my copied files?Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?cannot mount usbI can't access my USB device after mkfs.ntfs commandUSB flash drive formatted as “Linux Live CD” keeps the CD-ROM name after re-partitioningSet removable media (USB drive) permissions to a specific groupHow do I plug in a usb-drive?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5















The message below comes from another post and I tried it the way that they stated to. First, I mounted the USB drive:



sudo mount -o ro,noexec /dev/sdb1 /media


I mounted it as read-only to prevent any damage or changes to the USB while copying it, especially if I mixed up if and of. In the message below, I'm not sure if they wanted to me to use sdb or sdb# for if.




Before trying any recovery I would save the current state by backing up the whole device block by block: dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space. Then, if a recovery tool that writes to the disk makes more damage than repairing, you can go back (exchange if and of fields)."











share|improve this question









New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda ok, good to know.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday


















5















The message below comes from another post and I tried it the way that they stated to. First, I mounted the USB drive:



sudo mount -o ro,noexec /dev/sdb1 /media


I mounted it as read-only to prevent any damage or changes to the USB while copying it, especially if I mixed up if and of. In the message below, I'm not sure if they wanted to me to use sdb or sdb# for if.




Before trying any recovery I would save the current state by backing up the whole device block by block: dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space. Then, if a recovery tool that writes to the disk makes more damage than repairing, you can go back (exchange if and of fields)."











share|improve this question









New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda ok, good to know.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday














5












5








5


1






The message below comes from another post and I tried it the way that they stated to. First, I mounted the USB drive:



sudo mount -o ro,noexec /dev/sdb1 /media


I mounted it as read-only to prevent any damage or changes to the USB while copying it, especially if I mixed up if and of. In the message below, I'm not sure if they wanted to me to use sdb or sdb# for if.




Before trying any recovery I would save the current state by backing up the whole device block by block: dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space. Then, if a recovery tool that writes to the disk makes more damage than repairing, you can go back (exchange if and of fields)."











share|improve this question









New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The message below comes from another post and I tried it the way that they stated to. First, I mounted the USB drive:



sudo mount -o ro,noexec /dev/sdb1 /media


I mounted it as read-only to prevent any damage or changes to the USB while copying it, especially if I mixed up if and of. In the message below, I'm not sure if they wanted to me to use sdb or sdb# for if.




Before trying any recovery I would save the current state by backing up the whole device block by block: dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space. Then, if a recovery tool that writes to the disk makes more damage than repairing, you can go back (exchange if and of fields)."








usb






share|improve this question









New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

9566 silver badges9 bronze badges




9566 silver badges9 bronze badges






New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked yesterday









hddfsck777hddfsck777

295 bronze badges




295 bronze badges




New contributor



hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




hddfsck777 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda ok, good to know.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday



















  • If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

    – Kusalananda
    yesterday













  • @Kusalananda ok, good to know.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday

















If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

– Kusalananda
yesterday







If you're dd-ing the drive, why do you mount it at all? sdb1 is a partition, sdb is the whole disk.

– Kusalananda
yesterday















@Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday







@Kusalananda Simply, since the image is coming from a flash drive, I thought it had to be mounted like all usb's usually are. Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday















@Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday







@Kusalananda Since the usb 'was' mounted for the original dd, do you think that I made the usb less likely to be able to retrieve the deleted, stolen files from it? Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday















Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

– Kusalananda
yesterday







Ned64 addressed this in a comment (to a degree). Please don't ask follow-up questions in comments. This is not a discussion forum. Your question should be answerable with finality. Additional questions should be new questions.

– Kusalananda
yesterday















@Kusalananda ok, good to know.

– hddfsck777
yesterday





@Kusalananda ok, good to know.

– hddfsck777
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The best way to back up a whole drive is via dd because you can control buffer size for block devices better than with cat. While the USB drive is not mounted, please run, as root:



  dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space.



You can restore that backup by exchanging if and of arguments to dd.



Please note: dd can easily overwrite all your data beyond repair (with reasonable effort) if you get the parameters wrong!



This was first mentioned in my comment to your other question
Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

    – Ned64
    yesterday











  • Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

    – roaima
    yesterday













  • @roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

    – Ned64
    yesterday



















4














/dev/sdb is the entire USB disk, and /dev/sdb1 is a partition on the disk. If you want to image the entire disk, you want /dev/sdb.



That said, mounting as read-only isn't going to help you any in this case. You're bypassing the filesystem (which is where the read-only effect is) and working directly with the block device. So if you mix up i and o, you'll trash the disk anyway.



There isn't much benefit to dd here, you might just as well use cat:



sudo cat /dev/sdb > /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


(Or pv for a nice progress display.)






share|improve this answer


























  • what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

    – pizdelect
    yesterday






  • 1





    Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

    – Alex Cannon
    19 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






hddfsck777 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f535323%2fhow-do-i-make-an-image-of-my-entire-usb-flash-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














The best way to back up a whole drive is via dd because you can control buffer size for block devices better than with cat. While the USB drive is not mounted, please run, as root:



  dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space.



You can restore that backup by exchanging if and of arguments to dd.



Please note: dd can easily overwrite all your data beyond repair (with reasonable effort) if you get the parameters wrong!



This was first mentioned in my comment to your other question
Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

    – Ned64
    yesterday











  • Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

    – roaima
    yesterday













  • @roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

    – Ned64
    yesterday
















4














The best way to back up a whole drive is via dd because you can control buffer size for block devices better than with cat. While the USB drive is not mounted, please run, as root:



  dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space.



You can restore that backup by exchanging if and of arguments to dd.



Please note: dd can easily overwrite all your data beyond repair (with reasonable effort) if you get the parameters wrong!



This was first mentioned in my comment to your other question
Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

    – Ned64
    yesterday











  • Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

    – roaima
    yesterday













  • @roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

    – Ned64
    yesterday














4












4








4







The best way to back up a whole drive is via dd because you can control buffer size for block devices better than with cat. While the USB drive is not mounted, please run, as root:



  dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space.



You can restore that backup by exchanging if and of arguments to dd.



Please note: dd can easily overwrite all your data beyond repair (with reasonable effort) if you get the parameters wrong!



This was first mentioned in my comment to your other question
Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?






share|improve this answer













The best way to back up a whole drive is via dd because you can control buffer size for block devices better than with cat. While the USB drive is not mounted, please run, as root:



  dd if=/dev/sdb bs=16M of=/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


where /dev/sdb is your USB drive (check which one by using lsblk) and /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive is a path and filename you choose on a disk/partition with lots of space.



You can restore that backup by exchanging if and of arguments to dd.



Please note: dd can easily overwrite all your data beyond repair (with reasonable effort) if you get the parameters wrong!



This was first mentioned in my comment to your other question
Best linux recovery tool for deleted files from USB flash drive?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Ned64Ned64

3,2341 gold badge16 silver badges42 bronze badges




3,2341 gold badge16 silver badges42 bronze badges
















  • Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

    – Ned64
    yesterday











  • Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

    – roaima
    yesterday













  • @roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

    – Ned64
    yesterday



















  • Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

    – hddfsck777
    yesterday













  • @hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

    – Ned64
    yesterday











  • Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

    – roaima
    yesterday













  • @roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

    – Ned64
    yesterday

















Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

– hddfsck777
yesterday







Yes, as my question directly comes from your reply, thanks. I am very comfortable with dd now, the 'if' starts with where the files are now (ie: usb), and the 'of' is the destination for the image. And I check my 'dd' command 100 times to be sure before hitting enter! Originally, I don't think we spoke about mounting or not mounting, if I recall correctly. I can redo it. Thanks.

– hddfsck777
yesterday















Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday







Any way to check the authenticity of the (new) image created, to make sure it is not corrupted? Thx.

– hddfsck777
yesterday















@hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

– Ned64
yesterday





@hddfsck777 The data is usually copied without error. If you are unsure you could copy the data again, to a second file, and run sha256sum on both, then compare the hashes (or run diff -qs /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive2). The files may differ if you have mounted the disk in between.

– Ned64
yesterday













Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

– roaima
yesterday







Probably faster with cat /dev/sdb >/somelargedisk/rawusbdrive though. And easier to remember than dd.

– roaima
yesterday















@roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

– Ned64
yesterday





@roaima I do not think that cat would be faster as it would probably buffer with 512 Bytes as opposed to 16MiB specified by dd here. Many drives read and write faster with medium buffer sizes.

– Ned64
yesterday













4














/dev/sdb is the entire USB disk, and /dev/sdb1 is a partition on the disk. If you want to image the entire disk, you want /dev/sdb.



That said, mounting as read-only isn't going to help you any in this case. You're bypassing the filesystem (which is where the read-only effect is) and working directly with the block device. So if you mix up i and o, you'll trash the disk anyway.



There isn't much benefit to dd here, you might just as well use cat:



sudo cat /dev/sdb > /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


(Or pv for a nice progress display.)






share|improve this answer


























  • what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

    – pizdelect
    yesterday






  • 1





    Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

    – Alex Cannon
    19 hours ago
















4














/dev/sdb is the entire USB disk, and /dev/sdb1 is a partition on the disk. If you want to image the entire disk, you want /dev/sdb.



That said, mounting as read-only isn't going to help you any in this case. You're bypassing the filesystem (which is where the read-only effect is) and working directly with the block device. So if you mix up i and o, you'll trash the disk anyway.



There isn't much benefit to dd here, you might just as well use cat:



sudo cat /dev/sdb > /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


(Or pv for a nice progress display.)






share|improve this answer


























  • what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

    – pizdelect
    yesterday






  • 1





    Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

    – Alex Cannon
    19 hours ago














4












4








4







/dev/sdb is the entire USB disk, and /dev/sdb1 is a partition on the disk. If you want to image the entire disk, you want /dev/sdb.



That said, mounting as read-only isn't going to help you any in this case. You're bypassing the filesystem (which is where the read-only effect is) and working directly with the block device. So if you mix up i and o, you'll trash the disk anyway.



There isn't much benefit to dd here, you might just as well use cat:



sudo cat /dev/sdb > /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


(Or pv for a nice progress display.)






share|improve this answer













/dev/sdb is the entire USB disk, and /dev/sdb1 is a partition on the disk. If you want to image the entire disk, you want /dev/sdb.



That said, mounting as read-only isn't going to help you any in this case. You're bypassing the filesystem (which is where the read-only effect is) and working directly with the block device. So if you mix up i and o, you'll trash the disk anyway.



There isn't much benefit to dd here, you might just as well use cat:



sudo cat /dev/sdb > /somelargedisk/rawusbdrive


(Or pv for a nice progress display.)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









murumuru

43.7k5 gold badges110 silver badges181 bronze badges




43.7k5 gold badges110 silver badges181 bronze badges
















  • what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

    – pizdelect
    yesterday






  • 1





    Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

    – Alex Cannon
    19 hours ago



















  • what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

    – pizdelect
    yesterday






  • 1





    Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

    – Alex Cannon
    19 hours ago

















what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

– pizdelect
yesterday





what happens if cat dies with an i/o error? you keep both pieces? try again to read the damaged blicks

– pizdelect
yesterday




1




1





Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

– Alex Cannon
19 hours ago





Both cat and dd will fail from an Input / Output error. ddrescure was made for the purpose of continuing on after errors if that's what's happening.

– Alex Cannon
19 hours ago










hddfsck777 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















hddfsck777 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













hddfsck777 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












hddfsck777 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f535323%2fhow-do-i-make-an-image-of-my-entire-usb-flash-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...