74S vs 74LS ICsBinary coded decimal ICsEssential or recommended Digital ICs for a softwareICs Powering On...
Why did my folder names end up like this, and how can I fix this using a script?
What is the loud noise of a helicopter when the rotors are not yet moving?
Biological refrigeration?
Discussing work with supervisor in an invited dinner with his family
Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time
What are the IPSE’s, the ASPE’s, the FRIPSE’s and the GRIPSE’s?
Do you pay one or two mana to bounce a transformed Delver of Secrets with Repeal?
Reusing studs to hang shoe bins
Billiard balls collision
If a product space is metrisable, are the factor spaces metrisable?
Book featuring a child learning from a crowdsourced AI book
If I said I had $100 when asked, but I actually had $200, would I be lying by omission?
How is linear momentum conserved in case of a freely falling body?
Why is a statement like 1 + n *= 3 allowed in Ruby?
Generating negative voltage rail using 7805
Why did the population of Bhutan drop by 70% between 2007 and 2008?
What is Soda Fountain Etiquette?
Multiple delayed triggers from Massacre Girl interaction
Which old Technic set included large yellow motor?
What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?
Is this password scheme legit?
Dealing with stress in coding interviews
To what extent should we fear giving offense?
Is there a word or phrase that means "use other people's wifi or Internet service without consent"?
74S vs 74LS ICs
Binary coded decimal ICsEssential or recommended Digital ICs for a softwareICs Powering On With Random ValuesCMOS ICs Characteristic QueryCircuit to test ICs at home? (74hc04, 74hc08, 74hc32)How to decode a two bit signal into one-hot encoding, with 7400 series ICs?Counter/Timer ICs?Pull down for 74HCTXX series logic ICsUse of Power Pins in ICs
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.
Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?
or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?
(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).
The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html
digital-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.
Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?
or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?
(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).
The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html
digital-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.
Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?
or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?
(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).
The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html
digital-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.
Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?
or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?
(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).
The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html
digital-logic
digital-logic
New contributor
New contributor
edited 13 hours ago
Umar
4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
PsubondPsubond
213 bronze badges
213 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.
Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.
I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.
I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:
Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.
Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.
Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.
The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.
You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.
Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.
A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:
The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.
Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.
Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.
I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454726%2f74s-vs-74ls-ics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.
Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.
I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.
I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:
Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.
Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.
Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.
Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.
I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.
I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:
Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.
Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.
Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.
Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.
I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.
I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:
Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.
Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.
Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
$endgroup$
Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.
Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.
I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.
I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:
Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.
Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.
Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
edited 9 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
UmarUmar
4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
$endgroup$
– Umar
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.
The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.
The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.
The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.
$endgroup$
You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.
The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.
answered 13 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
222k5 gold badges177 silver badges464 bronze badges
222k5 gold badges177 silver badges464 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.
You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.
Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.
A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:
The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.
Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.
You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.
Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.
A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:
The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.
Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.
You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.
Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.
A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:
The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.
Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.
$endgroup$
74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.
You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.
Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.
A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:
The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.
Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.
answered 11 hours ago
glen_geekglen_geek
10.3k1 gold badge10 silver badges17 bronze badges
10.3k1 gold badge10 silver badges17 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.
Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.
I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.
Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.
I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.
Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.
I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.
$endgroup$
I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.
Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.
I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
TimWescottTimWescott
13k1 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges
13k1 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
$endgroup$
– Psubond
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
$endgroup$
– duskwuff
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454726%2f74s-vs-74ls-ics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago