74S vs 74LS ICsBinary coded decimal ICsEssential or recommended Digital ICs for a softwareICs Powering On...

Why did my folder names end up like this, and how can I fix this using a script?

What is the loud noise of a helicopter when the rotors are not yet moving?

Biological refrigeration?

Discussing work with supervisor in an invited dinner with his family

Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time

What are the IPSE’s, the ASPE’s, the FRIPSE’s and the GRIPSE’s?

Do you pay one or two mana to bounce a transformed Delver of Secrets with Repeal?

Reusing studs to hang shoe bins

Billiard balls collision

If a product space is metrisable, are the factor spaces metrisable?

Book featuring a child learning from a crowdsourced AI book

If I said I had $100 when asked, but I actually had $200, would I be lying by omission?

How is linear momentum conserved in case of a freely falling body?

Why is a statement like 1 + n *= 3 allowed in Ruby?

Generating negative voltage rail using 7805

Why did the population of Bhutan drop by 70% between 2007 and 2008?

What is Soda Fountain Etiquette?

Multiple delayed triggers from Massacre Girl interaction

Which old Technic set included large yellow motor?

What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?

Is this password scheme legit?

Dealing with stress in coding interviews

To what extent should we fear giving offense?

Is there a word or phrase that means "use other people's wifi or Internet service without consent"?



74S vs 74LS ICs


Binary coded decimal ICsEssential or recommended Digital ICs for a softwareICs Powering On With Random ValuesCMOS ICs Characteristic QueryCircuit to test ICs at home? (74hc04, 74hc08, 74hc32)How to decode a two bit signal into one-hot encoding, with 7400 series ICs?Counter/Timer ICs?Pull down for 74HCTXX series logic ICsUse of Power Pins in ICs






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4












$begingroup$


I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.



Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?

or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?



(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).



The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html










share|improve this question









New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Seidman
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
    $endgroup$
    – Umar
    13 hours ago




















4












$begingroup$


I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.



Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?

or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?



(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).



The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html










share|improve this question









New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Seidman
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
    $endgroup$
    – Umar
    13 hours ago
















4












4








4





$begingroup$


I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.



Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?

or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?



(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).



The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html










share|improve this question









New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I am starting my EE degree. I must purchase a myDAQ and a kit. The kit lists many logic ICs and I have most of them, but some of what I have are 74S instead of 74LS series.



Will the extra power draw on the 74S ICs cause issues with the myDAQ?

or do I need to bite the bullet and buy the parts?



(on digikey, I am NOT paying their markup on their stupid kit).



The parts kit consists of things like or, and, xor etc.... gates and can be found here: https://www.studica.com/us/en/NI-Hardware-Only/und-student-ni-mydaq-bundle-ee202-electric-lab/796087.html







digital-logic






share|improve this question









New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









Umar

4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges




4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges






New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 13 hours ago









PsubondPsubond

213 bronze badges




213 bronze badges




New contributor



Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Psubond is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • $begingroup$
    Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Seidman
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
    $endgroup$
    – Umar
    13 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
    $endgroup$
    – Scott Seidman
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
    $endgroup$
    – Umar
    13 hours ago


















$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Whoever fixed formatting, thank you
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
The wiki page answers what the difference is, but I am not understanding if the myDAQ (looks like a type of interface between the computer and projects for labs) will have an issue with the extra power draw of the 74S. From the looks of the kit, I don't think I will need to do anything other than drive other ICs and maybe a LED
$endgroup$
– Psubond
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Wow- you're in it for $250 bucks just for the NI parts!! Personally, I would think long and hard before doing that to my students. I hope this supports 2 or 3 classes, and not just one!
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago






$begingroup$
you are still starting EE degree. warm welcome! This question was good because: you have straight clear question to ask, you have done your research (difference between LS and S family), and you have given the link for the references. If the question is good, it is worth spending time to improve the readability by editing. everyone will be happy to do that.
$endgroup$
– Umar
13 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5













$begingroup$

Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.



Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.



I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.



enter image description here



I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:






  • Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.


  • Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.


  • Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
    which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
    enter image description here







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
    $endgroup$
    – Psubond
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Umar
    12 hours ago



















2













$begingroup$

You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.



The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$























    1













    $begingroup$

    74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.

    You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.

    Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.



    A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:




    The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
    The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.




    Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$























      1













      $begingroup$

      I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.



      Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.



      I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$











      • 1




        $begingroup$
        And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
        $endgroup$
        – TimWescott
        12 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
        $endgroup$
        – Psubond
        12 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
        $endgroup$
        – glen_geek
        11 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
        $endgroup$
        – duskwuff
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
        $endgroup$
        – TimWescott
        7 hours ago














      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      });
      }, "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454726%2f74s-vs-74ls-ics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5













      $begingroup$

      Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.



      Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.



      I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.



      enter image description here



      I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:






      • Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.


      • Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.


      • Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
        which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
        enter image description here







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
        $endgroup$
        – Psubond
        12 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
        $endgroup$
        – Umar
        12 hours ago
















      5













      $begingroup$

      Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.



      Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.



      I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.



      enter image description here



      I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:






      • Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.


      • Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.


      • Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
        which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
        enter image description here







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
        $endgroup$
        – Psubond
        12 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
        $endgroup$
        – Umar
        12 hours ago














      5














      5










      5







      $begingroup$

      Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.



      Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.



      I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.



      enter image description here



      I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:






      • Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.


      • Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.


      • Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
        which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
        enter image description here







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Good question. here is a high level comparison of current consumption.



      Note the difference in the values of $I_{OL}$ of two devices (for example). 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ where as 74S has $I_{OL}$ of $8m$. The drive ability is different. If you are only doing this for a low speed simple circuits this will be okay but if there are experiments planned considering high drive strength of 74S, you might have to use a buffer.



      I would suggest to really go ahead with the S version alone. the LS version are low power and better for a product design, but the S version will do just fine for basic circuits, which is planned. This is a hands on kit and hence i strongly recommend to use what you have and buy only those which you really need in future. IF there are circuits, which are pushing the LS version to their limits, you can handle it with buffers or buy.



      enter image description here



      I will compare the differences in the performance of the two devices SN74S04 and SN74LS04 and how and where it matters:






      • Current Consumption SN74LS04 consumes a maximum of $6.6 mA$ when outputting a logic zero compared to $54 mA$ max of SN74S04. It also means that, the internal temperature of the component will be higher. It also adds to overall current consumption of the product. It reduces battery life (wastes power) or demands higher capacity battery.


      • Ability of FANOUT the LS part has about $8 mA$ of $I_{OL}$ and $0.4 mA$ of $I_{IL}$. It means, when connected in a system, an LS IC can support upto $ 8/0.4 = 20$ devices. The S part on the other hand has $I_{OL}$ of $20 mA$ but $I_{IL}$of $2 mA$. Hence, the part can drive upto $10$ devices theoretically. Hence, LS part is better when there are multiple inputs driven by the single output pin. The fanout may demand perhaps a new buffer to support the fanout needed in S family when compared to LS family, adding to cost and size on the PCB.


      • Below is a simple comparison from http://www.ti.com/lit/sg/sdyu001ab/sdyu001ab.pdf
        which compares the applications of LS and S parts from TI (in general).
        enter image description here








      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 9 hours ago

























      answered 13 hours ago









      UmarUmar

      4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges




      4,7283 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges















      • $begingroup$
        awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
        $endgroup$
        – Psubond
        12 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
        $endgroup$
        – Umar
        12 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
        $endgroup$
        – Psubond
        12 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
        $endgroup$
        – Umar
        12 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
      $endgroup$
      – Psubond
      12 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      awesome answer, thank you! I dug around and it seems the only questionable part I have is a 74S83 instead of a 74LS83. Ended up having the rest of the parts in 74LSXXX. Had a bunch of parts given to me and wasn't really sure what I had on hand. I will try the S83 once i get the myDAQ (still irritated by the price on that thing and their markup on their kit)
      $endgroup$
      – Psubond
      12 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Umar
      12 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      I am really not sure about the validity of the price. Other experts can comment on it. When components are expensive, simulations are my friend. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Umar
      12 hours ago













      2













      $begingroup$

      You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.



      The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        2













        $begingroup$

        You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.



        The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          2














          2










          2







          $begingroup$

          You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.



          The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You might have to pay attention to fanout if you're driving 74S with 74LS or CMOS outputs. It's only about 2 from 74LS (check the datasheets)- meaning one 74LS output can only drive 2 74S inputs (in general) without potentially compromising noise margin.



          The timing is also different (quite a bit- maybe 3x- faster) so there might be other issues, depending on the circuit.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 13 hours ago









          Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

          222k5 gold badges177 silver badges464 bronze badges




          222k5 gold badges177 silver badges464 bronze badges


























              1













              $begingroup$

              74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.

              You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.

              Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.



              A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:




              The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
              The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.




              Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                1













                $begingroup$

                74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.

                You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.

                Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.



                A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:




                The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
                The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.




                Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1














                  1










                  1







                  $begingroup$

                  74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.

                  You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.

                  Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.



                  A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:




                  The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
                  The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.




                  Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  74S chips run warm, drawing considerably more DC quiescent power from your MyDAQ +5v supply than 74LS chips. For example, a 74S00 dissipates 19mW where a 74LS00 dissipates 2mW.

                  You should pay attention to the 500mW limit total power available from all three supplies (5v, +15v, -15v)...both 74S & 74LS chips don't like a DC supply that sags or glitches. A breadboard full of 74S chips may stress MyDAQ's DC supply.

                  Note that a 74LS output pin can drive up to four 74S input pins, compared to ten 74LS input pins - likely not a serious problem for simple logic circuits.



                  A cryptic note in the MyDAQ user manual (avoiding a proper description of logic voltage levels and current levels) describes MyDAQ's somewhat odd digital I/O. It seems odd that no +3.3V DC supply is offered but TTL compatibility seems possible:




                  The digital I/O lines are 3.3 V LVTTL and are tolerant to 5 V inputs.
                  The digital output is not compatible with 5 V CMOS logic levels.




                  Since you'll likely be wiring 14-pin DIP chips on a breadboard, some careful attention should be paid to keeping high-speed logic transitions tamed, as Spehro has suggested. This would include power-supply smoothing capacitors on every logic chip.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 11 hours ago









                  glen_geekglen_geek

                  10.3k1 gold badge10 silver badges17 bronze badges




                  10.3k1 gold badge10 silver badges17 bronze badges


























                      1













                      $begingroup$

                      I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.



                      Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.



                      I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$











                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        12 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                        $endgroup$
                        – Psubond
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                        $endgroup$
                        – glen_geek
                        11 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                        $endgroup$
                        – duskwuff
                        8 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        7 hours ago
















                      1













                      $begingroup$

                      I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.



                      Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.



                      I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$











                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        12 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                        $endgroup$
                        – Psubond
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                        $endgroup$
                        – glen_geek
                        11 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                        $endgroup$
                        – duskwuff
                        8 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        7 hours ago














                      1














                      1










                      1







                      $begingroup$

                      I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.



                      Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.



                      I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      I would expect all sorts of unanticipated problems substituting an S part for an LS.



                      Enough strange things happen in student labs as it is -- you really don't want to be that guy with the non-standard kit.



                      I used to be a lab TA, a long time ago. If I had a student that was having trouble, and had non-standard parts, then unless I was in a good mood and they had an absolutely top-notch sob story about why they had non-standard parts (and "I was offended by the price" is not adequate), my troubleshooting efforts would be confined to "get the right parts, and let me know if you still have trouble". If I were a prof in such a situation, I'd back up my TA.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 7 hours ago

























                      answered 12 hours ago









                      TimWescottTimWescott

                      13k1 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges




                      13k1 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges











                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        12 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                        $endgroup$
                        – Psubond
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                        $endgroup$
                        – glen_geek
                        11 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                        $endgroup$
                        – duskwuff
                        8 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        7 hours ago














                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        12 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                        $endgroup$
                        – Psubond
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                        $endgroup$
                        – glen_geek
                        11 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                        $endgroup$
                        – duskwuff
                        8 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TimWescott
                        7 hours ago








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                      $endgroup$
                      – TimWescott
                      12 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      And, BTW: 74S was obsolete a long time ago, and 74LS not too long after. It's unfortunate that your uni doesn't want to update its labs.
                      $endgroup$
                      – TimWescott
                      12 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                      $endgroup$
                      – Psubond
                      12 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      It is only one part and i still need to buy some 1n4148 diodes, so i will probably buy the 74LS83, rest of my parts meet the parts list in the kit
                      $endgroup$
                      – Psubond
                      12 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                      $endgroup$
                      – glen_geek
                      11 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Tim, your TA standards seem reasonable. Perhaps call to task that old-school prof to get with MOS-based logic. Something that a student might suggest in an end-of-course evaluation (if offered). TTL should be a subject for "Ancient Engineering" course.
                      $endgroup$
                      – glen_geek
                      11 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                      $endgroup$
                      – duskwuff
                      8 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @TimWescott I think the OP is the one with the 74S parts here. The lab kit appears to all be 74LS.
                      $endgroup$
                      – duskwuff
                      8 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                      $endgroup$
                      – TimWescott
                      7 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @duskwuff So it is. Text edited -- but not by much.
                      $endgroup$
                      – TimWescott
                      7 hours ago










                      Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Psubond is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454726%2f74s-vs-74ls-ics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                      Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                      Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...