Weird corners with clineCan't get table border lines to meet in the cornerstabular* with rubber spacing and...

Thought experiment and possible contradiction between electromagnetism and special relativity

What's special ammo in Destiny 2?

When using a variable to set the path, I get "No such file or directory", but works fine otherwise

What does it take for witness testimony to be believed?

Talk interpreter

Who was the most successful German spy against Great Britain in WWII, from the contemporary German perspective?

Do you pay one or two mana to bounce a transformed Delver of Secrets with Repeal?

Beginner to guitar playing - where should I begin?

Can I get a PhD for developing an educational software?

Why did my folder names end up like this, and how can I fix this using a script?

Expanding powers of expressions of the form ax+b

3D cryptic featuring Mao, Stalin and Simba's uncle

What's the point of fighting monsters in Zelda BoTW?

What is the name of this plot that has rows with two connected dots?

Number of academics in various EU countries

How do you capitalize agile costs with less mature teams?

How much does Commander Data weigh?

Why is getting a PhD considered "financially irresponsible" by some people?

Does a Mace of Disruption's Frightened effect override undead immunity to the Frightened condition?

Why is strlen so complex in C?

Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time

Is this password scheme legit?

Redacting URLs as an email-phishing preventative?

Did Dr. Hannibal Lecter like Clarice or was he attracted to her?



Weird corners with cline


Can't get table border lines to meet in the cornerstabular* with rubber spacing and clineTable with rounded corners?Table with rounded cornerscline Not Working with Customized Column PaddingTable Border Line with cline bleaches outWeird vertical lines with tableCline doesn´t work properlySpace between cline in tableTabular with rounded corners made with tikzpicture with overlay is not properly positioned inside table environment






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5















The intersection of horizontal clines and vertical lines in tables look weird. Here is a MWE:



documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
%usepackage{array}

begin{document}

begin{table}
centering
begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
cline{2-3}
a&b&c&d\
cline{2-3}
end{tabular}
end{table}

end{document}


Here is the output:



enter image description here



As you can see, there are small gaps at the intersections of the horizontal and the vertical lines at the two corners at the bottom. Interestingly, the two corners at the top are fine.



Now if the array package is loaded (simply uncomment in the code above), then I get:



enter image description here



The weird gap is gone at the lower right corner but it still persists at the lower left corner.



I did a considerable amount of research into this (see, e.g., this post) but did not find any definitive solution. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.



(I am aware of the existence of hhline but I read in another post that it might be prone to similar intersection issues, so I’d prefer a solution without it.)










share|improve this question









New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

    – Bernard
    10 hours ago











  • @Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

    – triple_sec
    9 hours ago











  • I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

    – Bernard
    9 hours ago











  • @Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

    – triple_sec
    7 hours ago




















5















The intersection of horizontal clines and vertical lines in tables look weird. Here is a MWE:



documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
%usepackage{array}

begin{document}

begin{table}
centering
begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
cline{2-3}
a&b&c&d\
cline{2-3}
end{tabular}
end{table}

end{document}


Here is the output:



enter image description here



As you can see, there are small gaps at the intersections of the horizontal and the vertical lines at the two corners at the bottom. Interestingly, the two corners at the top are fine.



Now if the array package is loaded (simply uncomment in the code above), then I get:



enter image description here



The weird gap is gone at the lower right corner but it still persists at the lower left corner.



I did a considerable amount of research into this (see, e.g., this post) but did not find any definitive solution. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.



(I am aware of the existence of hhline but I read in another post that it might be prone to similar intersection issues, so I’d prefer a solution without it.)










share|improve this question









New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

    – Bernard
    10 hours ago











  • @Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

    – triple_sec
    9 hours ago











  • I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

    – Bernard
    9 hours ago











  • @Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

    – triple_sec
    7 hours ago
















5












5








5








The intersection of horizontal clines and vertical lines in tables look weird. Here is a MWE:



documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
%usepackage{array}

begin{document}

begin{table}
centering
begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
cline{2-3}
a&b&c&d\
cline{2-3}
end{tabular}
end{table}

end{document}


Here is the output:



enter image description here



As you can see, there are small gaps at the intersections of the horizontal and the vertical lines at the two corners at the bottom. Interestingly, the two corners at the top are fine.



Now if the array package is loaded (simply uncomment in the code above), then I get:



enter image description here



The weird gap is gone at the lower right corner but it still persists at the lower left corner.



I did a considerable amount of research into this (see, e.g., this post) but did not find any definitive solution. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.



(I am aware of the existence of hhline but I read in another post that it might be prone to similar intersection issues, so I’d prefer a solution without it.)










share|improve this question









New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The intersection of horizontal clines and vertical lines in tables look weird. Here is a MWE:



documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
%usepackage{array}

begin{document}

begin{table}
centering
begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
cline{2-3}
a&b&c&d\
cline{2-3}
end{tabular}
end{table}

end{document}


Here is the output:



enter image description here



As you can see, there are small gaps at the intersections of the horizontal and the vertical lines at the two corners at the bottom. Interestingly, the two corners at the top are fine.



Now if the array package is loaded (simply uncomment in the code above), then I get:



enter image description here



The weird gap is gone at the lower right corner but it still persists at the lower left corner.



I did a considerable amount of research into this (see, e.g., this post) but did not find any definitive solution. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.



(I am aware of the existence of hhline but I read in another post that it might be prone to similar intersection issues, so I’d prefer a solution without it.)







tables






share|improve this question









New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







triple_sec













New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 11 hours ago









triple_sectriple_sec

1263 bronze badges




1263 bronze badges




New contributor



triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




triple_sec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

    – Bernard
    10 hours ago











  • @Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

    – triple_sec
    9 hours ago











  • I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

    – Bernard
    9 hours ago











  • @Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

    – triple_sec
    7 hours ago





















  • If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

    – Bernard
    10 hours ago











  • @Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

    – triple_sec
    9 hours ago











  • I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

    – Bernard
    9 hours ago











  • @Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

    – triple_sec
    7 hours ago



















If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

– Bernard
10 hours ago





If it only partially works loading array, maybe this is due to tthe oneside option the ‘article’? ;o)

– Bernard
10 hours ago













@Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

– triple_sec
9 hours ago





@Bernard Nice catch! Alas, the output is the same upon taking out oneside.

– triple_sec
9 hours ago













I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

– Bernard
9 hours ago





I just found funny that a one-side defect happened with the oneside option…

– Bernard
9 hours ago













@Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

– triple_sec
7 hours ago







@Bernard It would make sense, but it would also be a surprise if TeX were that predictable... :-)

– triple_sec
7 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6















You get precise control with hhline:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{hhline}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
hhline{~|-|-|~}
a&b&c&d\
hhline{~|-|-|~}
end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here





  • ~ means no rule for the cell,


  • | means an intersection with a vertical rule,


  • - means a rule for the cell.






share|improve this answer

































    6















    Don't know why it happens, but here's a fix...diminish the \ by arrayrulewidth (EDITED to reflect arrayrulewidth rather than fboxrule, hat tip: David Carlisle).



    documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
    %usepackage{array}

    begin{document}

    begin{table}
    centering
    begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
    cline{2-3}
    a&b&c&d\[-arrayrulewidth]
    cline{2-3}
    end{tabular}
    end{table}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    If one is concerned that this approach shrinks the height of the cell by -arrayrulewidth, then just compensate by adding an extra arrayrulewidth to the depth of the line before the shrunken \. Compare the original box on the left with the revised on the right.



    documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
    %usepackage{array}
    newcommandmystrut{rule[dimexpr-dpstrutbox-arrayrulewidth]{0pt}{%
    dimexprbaselineskip+arrayrulewidth}}
    begin{document}

    begin{table}
    centering
    begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
    cline{2-3}
    a&b&c&d\
    cline{2-3}
    end{tabular}%
    %
    begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
    cline{2-3}
    a&b&c&dmystrut\[-arrayrulewidth]
    cline{2-3}
    end{tabular}
    end{table}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























    • This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

      – triple_sec
      10 hours ago













    • @triple_sec Please see my edit.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      10 hours ago






    • 2





      Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

      – David Carlisle
      9 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    triple_sec is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505789%2fweird-corners-with-cline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6















    You get precise control with hhline:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{hhline}

    begin{document}

    begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
    hhline{~|-|-|~}
    a&b&c&d\
    hhline{~|-|-|~}
    end{tabular}

    end{document}


    enter image description here





    • ~ means no rule for the cell,


    • | means an intersection with a vertical rule,


    • - means a rule for the cell.






    share|improve this answer






























      6















      You get precise control with hhline:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{hhline}

      begin{document}

      begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
      hhline{~|-|-|~}
      a&b&c&d\
      hhline{~|-|-|~}
      end{tabular}

      end{document}


      enter image description here





      • ~ means no rule for the cell,


      • | means an intersection with a vertical rule,


      • - means a rule for the cell.






      share|improve this answer




























        6














        6










        6









        You get precise control with hhline:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{hhline}

        begin{document}

        begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
        hhline{~|-|-|~}
        a&b&c&d\
        hhline{~|-|-|~}
        end{tabular}

        end{document}


        enter image description here





        • ~ means no rule for the cell,


        • | means an intersection with a vertical rule,


        • - means a rule for the cell.






        share|improve this answer













        You get precise control with hhline:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{hhline}

        begin{document}

        begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
        hhline{~|-|-|~}
        a&b&c&d\
        hhline{~|-|-|~}
        end{tabular}

        end{document}


        enter image description here





        • ~ means no rule for the cell,


        • | means an intersection with a vertical rule,


        • - means a rule for the cell.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        egregegreg

        764k90 gold badges1997 silver badges3345 bronze badges




        764k90 gold badges1997 silver badges3345 bronze badges




























            6















            Don't know why it happens, but here's a fix...diminish the \ by arrayrulewidth (EDITED to reflect arrayrulewidth rather than fboxrule, hat tip: David Carlisle).



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}

            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            If one is concerned that this approach shrinks the height of the cell by -arrayrulewidth, then just compensate by adding an extra arrayrulewidth to the depth of the line before the shrunken \. Compare the original box on the left with the revised on the right.



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}
            newcommandmystrut{rule[dimexpr-dpstrutbox-arrayrulewidth]{0pt}{%
            dimexprbaselineskip+arrayrulewidth}}
            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}%
            %
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&dmystrut\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




























            • This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

              – triple_sec
              10 hours ago













            • @triple_sec Please see my edit.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              10 hours ago






            • 2





              Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

              – David Carlisle
              9 hours ago
















            6















            Don't know why it happens, but here's a fix...diminish the \ by arrayrulewidth (EDITED to reflect arrayrulewidth rather than fboxrule, hat tip: David Carlisle).



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}

            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            If one is concerned that this approach shrinks the height of the cell by -arrayrulewidth, then just compensate by adding an extra arrayrulewidth to the depth of the line before the shrunken \. Compare the original box on the left with the revised on the right.



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}
            newcommandmystrut{rule[dimexpr-dpstrutbox-arrayrulewidth]{0pt}{%
            dimexprbaselineskip+arrayrulewidth}}
            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}%
            %
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&dmystrut\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




























            • This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

              – triple_sec
              10 hours ago













            • @triple_sec Please see my edit.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              10 hours ago






            • 2





              Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

              – David Carlisle
              9 hours ago














            6














            6










            6









            Don't know why it happens, but here's a fix...diminish the \ by arrayrulewidth (EDITED to reflect arrayrulewidth rather than fboxrule, hat tip: David Carlisle).



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}

            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            If one is concerned that this approach shrinks the height of the cell by -arrayrulewidth, then just compensate by adding an extra arrayrulewidth to the depth of the line before the shrunken \. Compare the original box on the left with the revised on the right.



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}
            newcommandmystrut{rule[dimexpr-dpstrutbox-arrayrulewidth]{0pt}{%
            dimexprbaselineskip+arrayrulewidth}}
            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}%
            %
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&dmystrut\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            Don't know why it happens, but here's a fix...diminish the \ by arrayrulewidth (EDITED to reflect arrayrulewidth rather than fboxrule, hat tip: David Carlisle).



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}

            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here



            If one is concerned that this approach shrinks the height of the cell by -arrayrulewidth, then just compensate by adding an extra arrayrulewidth to the depth of the line before the shrunken \. Compare the original box on the left with the revised on the right.



            documentclass[11pt,oneside]{article}
            %usepackage{array}
            newcommandmystrut{rule[dimexpr-dpstrutbox-arrayrulewidth]{0pt}{%
            dimexprbaselineskip+arrayrulewidth}}
            begin{document}

            begin{table}
            centering
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&d\
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}%
            %
            begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
            cline{2-3}
            a&b&c&dmystrut\[-arrayrulewidth]
            cline{2-3}
            end{tabular}
            end{table}

            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 9 hours ago

























            answered 11 hours ago









            Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

            169k9 gold badges214 silver badges441 bronze badges




            169k9 gold badges214 silver badges441 bronze badges
















            • This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

              – triple_sec
              10 hours ago













            • @triple_sec Please see my edit.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              10 hours ago






            • 2





              Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

              – David Carlisle
              9 hours ago



















            • This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

              – triple_sec
              10 hours ago













            • @triple_sec Please see my edit.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              10 hours ago






            • 2





              Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

              – David Carlisle
              9 hours ago

















            This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

            – triple_sec
            10 hours ago







            This is clever, thank you! Doesn’t it shrink the height of cells, though? (I know it’s a PITA and I probably shouldn’t do this, but I like to control cell heights as much as TeX lets me.)

            – triple_sec
            10 hours ago















            @triple_sec Please see my edit.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            10 hours ago





            @triple_sec Please see my edit.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            10 hours ago




            2




            2





            Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

            – David Carlisle
            9 hours ago





            Fboxrule Is used for fbox not tables atrayrulewifth

            – David Carlisle
            9 hours ago










            triple_sec is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            triple_sec is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            triple_sec is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            triple_sec is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505789%2fweird-corners-with-cline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...