A continuous water “planet” ring around a starIs it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?Can I...
How does "Te vas a cansar" mean "You're going to get tired"?
If a digital camera can be "hacked" in the ransomware sense, how best to protect it?
Halting problem in EXP-complete
What are the uses and limitations of Persuasion, Insight, and Deception against other PCs?
What does the phrase "pull off sick wheelies and flips" mean here?
Do beef farmed pastures net remove carbon emissions?
How to divide item stack in MC PE?
Why did Gandalf use a sword against the Balrog?
Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255
Breadcrumb history decision
What is my malfunctioning AI harvesting from humans?
Why command hierarchy, if the chain of command is standing next to each other?
Not going forward with internship interview process
Solution to German Tank Problem
Google - OR tools for workforce scheduling problems
Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?
Why are Gatwick's runways too close together?
How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?
Can anybody explain why using multicolumn changes the width of the four-column tabular environment?
A Word/Phrase for the Process of Classifying Something as a Sin
Help me aout with this summation
Is there a standardised way to check fake news?
Why I have higher ping to the VLAN interface than to other local interfaces
Bitcoin successfully deducted on sender wallet but did not reach receiver wallet
A continuous water “planet” ring around a star
Is it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?Can I have a very dense asteroid belt ring around a star?Building a (solid) ring around the earthHow much does my secondary star heat the planet orbiting my primary star?Earth-like planet orbiting neutron star?Tidally locked planet in binary star system?Behavior of neutron star material outside of neutron starMassive planets around an old blue starWhat is the habitable zone around my star?Is a star orbiting around planets(not a single planet) possible?Making a 180 degree turn around a starCan a collision with a neutron star make a planet via the can-o-snakes method?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
It is impossible to have a continuous mostly liquid water ring around a star?
Probably such a configuration would be unstable under normal planetary forming condition. I am looking for a good physical reason why it could never be possible.
It is related to these questions :
- Can I have a very dense asteroid belt ring around a star?
- Is it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/41254/why-is-larry-nivens-ringworld-unstable
solar wind, internal friction forces, water triple
point, axial-transverse displacements, roche limit.
- assemble various materials
- phase states
- internal movements
- stabilizing cycles
gravity stars
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is impossible to have a continuous mostly liquid water ring around a star?
Probably such a configuration would be unstable under normal planetary forming condition. I am looking for a good physical reason why it could never be possible.
It is related to these questions :
- Can I have a very dense asteroid belt ring around a star?
- Is it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/41254/why-is-larry-nivens-ringworld-unstable
solar wind, internal friction forces, water triple
point, axial-transverse displacements, roche limit.
- assemble various materials
- phase states
- internal movements
- stabilizing cycles
gravity stars
New contributor
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is impossible to have a continuous mostly liquid water ring around a star?
Probably such a configuration would be unstable under normal planetary forming condition. I am looking for a good physical reason why it could never be possible.
It is related to these questions :
- Can I have a very dense asteroid belt ring around a star?
- Is it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/41254/why-is-larry-nivens-ringworld-unstable
solar wind, internal friction forces, water triple
point, axial-transverse displacements, roche limit.
- assemble various materials
- phase states
- internal movements
- stabilizing cycles
gravity stars
New contributor
$endgroup$
It is impossible to have a continuous mostly liquid water ring around a star?
Probably such a configuration would be unstable under normal planetary forming condition. I am looking for a good physical reason why it could never be possible.
It is related to these questions :
- Can I have a very dense asteroid belt ring around a star?
- Is it possible for a planet to have a liquid ring?
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/41254/why-is-larry-nivens-ringworld-unstable
solar wind, internal friction forces, water triple
point, axial-transverse displacements, roche limit.
- assemble various materials
- phase states
- internal movements
- stabilizing cycles
gravity stars
gravity stars
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
Cyn
18.3k2 gold badges37 silver badges83 bronze badges
18.3k2 gold badges37 silver badges83 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
Carl GreifenklaCarl Greifenkla
314 bronze badges
314 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
6
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Every orbiting ring-like structure is unstable due to gravity. Yes, even Saturn rings and Asteroid Belt in Solar System are unstable: they constantly lose and rearrange "particles". Asteroid belt is more an intersection of asteroid orbits, then some ring structure. There is always a tendency to form some clusters even inside Roche limit. It means that this liquid ring at best case would become the ring of water drops, blobs and one or two liquid planetoids (like in Saturn System they are needed for ring quasi-stability).
It can be easily understood if you consider the closer and outer parts of this ring, and also ring at periapsis and apoapsis. They would always have considerable velocity difference, resulting in massive whirls forming. Those whirls would inevitably separate and form planetoids, which would then evolve to something like Saturn's rings & moons, or to a single planet (depending on starting mass and orbit)
Сontinuous liquid ring is impossible.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are a few points
Friction: If your water needs to be high up enough so that it isn't affected by the friction of particles in the atmosphere which will slow it down and eventually cause it to rain down.
Solar Winds: Your water needs to be in the atmosphere to offer it protection from solar winds. If it is too high, the solar winds will hit your water and eventually strip it from the planet or cause it to enter the atmosphere. This conflicts with the Friction part.
Space: Space is essentially a vacuum and when water is placed in a vacuum it will first boil and then freeze, creating a powder of frozen ice crystals. Basically your water needs to be close enough to the sun, so that it can remain in a liquid state, however at this height, it will be close enough to the sun to be impacted by solar winds. This will cause a conflict with the Solar Winds Part.
Asteroids: There are a lot of asteroids that hit the earths atmosphere and burn up. Unfortunately, due to the amount of light pollution, we cannot see them unless we are in very remote places. If your layer of water is outside of the atmosphere, the asteroids will hit your water rings and cause it to rain back down on earth. After several million years, there won't be much left (especially since water will try to stick to itself due to surface tension).
Surface Tension: Water doesn't like to act alone. It likes to stick to itself and link up. Anything that impacts a pure water ring will have rippling effects along the entire ring as the shock is dispersed through the water. Anything outside of a perfect laminar flowing ring of water will cause small discrepancies and a buildup in volume at one location which will eventually cause it to be pulled down. For examples of water tension in space have a look at the videos on the international space station. It will literally stick to your skin.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Liquid is hard to get in space: you can get either solid or gas. You therefore might get ice particles of various size, or water vapor.
Ice would slowly sublimate to gas, and gas would be blown away by the stellar wind. The rate at which this happens would depend on the distance from the star. On the far side of the goldilocks zone ices can live as long as the star.
But they won't form a ring all around the orbit, unless they are extremely sparse. If they are dense enough, gravity will soon coalesce them into a single body.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Friction of the fluid against itself as a wave-propagating medium results in local concentrations of density, and ultimately in the continuous material being broken up. The only stable condition for fluid particles is that they must isolate themselves from the wave field through cohesion into local, disconnected bodies or else lose energy to internal motion and fall from their orbit.
It was James Clerk Maxwell who first discovered that rings around a planetary body (including a star) could not possibly consist of a contiguous fluid:
"Supposing the ring to be fluid and continuous, we found that it will
be necessarily broken up into small portions. We conclude, therefore,
that the rings must consist of disconnected particles; these may be
either solid or liquid, but they must be independent. The entire
system of rings must therefore consist either of a series of many
concentric rings, each moving with its own velocity, and having its
own systems of waves, or else of a confused multitude of revolving
particles, not arranged in rings, and continually coming into
collision with each other."
https://archive.org/details/onstabilityofmot00maxw/page/66
Incidentally, it was in this work that Maxwell derived the Criterion for the Stability of a Dynamical System, which is the key to all modern control theory and practice, including robots, automobiles, airplanes, biochemical control, and so on.
Mankind learned how to stabilize mechanical engines and to create robots using sensor feedback loops for control as a direct consequence of Maxwell's investigation into Saturn's rings.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it is impossible:
Liquid water cannot exist at pressures below 0.006Bar so in order to have liquid water in free orbit around a star you would first need a gas torus. Now the highest density we've directly observed in such a torus is around the planet Jupiter it has an amazing 2000 particles per cubic centimetre (that's not in any way measurable as a pressure). Getting a torus dense enough around a normal star is probably not realistic, there is a possible solution for forming such a torus but I'm not completely sure that it's accuracy.
Conditions which allow you to have liquid water are almost impossible but even if you could have them a water ring wouldn't be stable. Due to differences in the orbital velocity and momentum of various parts of the ring very few water molecules are actually moving in identical orbital tracks. Parts of the ring are moving in close to the same way as each other but not the same way as their neighbours, this will cause the ring to disintegrate into smaller and smaller droplets as smaller and smaller differences in velocity add up. You could have a thick ring of air that is above 100% relative humidity such that water vapour was constantly coalescing into clouds, droplets and even larger spheroidal pools, lakes and oceans that are then pulled apart by gravitational and orbital forces but not a single permanently contiguous ring of liquid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Carl Greifenkla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152747%2fa-continuous-water-planet-ring-around-a-star%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Every orbiting ring-like structure is unstable due to gravity. Yes, even Saturn rings and Asteroid Belt in Solar System are unstable: they constantly lose and rearrange "particles". Asteroid belt is more an intersection of asteroid orbits, then some ring structure. There is always a tendency to form some clusters even inside Roche limit. It means that this liquid ring at best case would become the ring of water drops, blobs and one or two liquid planetoids (like in Saturn System they are needed for ring quasi-stability).
It can be easily understood if you consider the closer and outer parts of this ring, and also ring at periapsis and apoapsis. They would always have considerable velocity difference, resulting in massive whirls forming. Those whirls would inevitably separate and form planetoids, which would then evolve to something like Saturn's rings & moons, or to a single planet (depending on starting mass and orbit)
Сontinuous liquid ring is impossible.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every orbiting ring-like structure is unstable due to gravity. Yes, even Saturn rings and Asteroid Belt in Solar System are unstable: they constantly lose and rearrange "particles". Asteroid belt is more an intersection of asteroid orbits, then some ring structure. There is always a tendency to form some clusters even inside Roche limit. It means that this liquid ring at best case would become the ring of water drops, blobs and one or two liquid planetoids (like in Saturn System they are needed for ring quasi-stability).
It can be easily understood if you consider the closer and outer parts of this ring, and also ring at periapsis and apoapsis. They would always have considerable velocity difference, resulting in massive whirls forming. Those whirls would inevitably separate and form planetoids, which would then evolve to something like Saturn's rings & moons, or to a single planet (depending on starting mass and orbit)
Сontinuous liquid ring is impossible.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every orbiting ring-like structure is unstable due to gravity. Yes, even Saturn rings and Asteroid Belt in Solar System are unstable: they constantly lose and rearrange "particles". Asteroid belt is more an intersection of asteroid orbits, then some ring structure. There is always a tendency to form some clusters even inside Roche limit. It means that this liquid ring at best case would become the ring of water drops, blobs and one or two liquid planetoids (like in Saturn System they are needed for ring quasi-stability).
It can be easily understood if you consider the closer and outer parts of this ring, and also ring at periapsis and apoapsis. They would always have considerable velocity difference, resulting in massive whirls forming. Those whirls would inevitably separate and form planetoids, which would then evolve to something like Saturn's rings & moons, or to a single planet (depending on starting mass and orbit)
Сontinuous liquid ring is impossible.
$endgroup$
Every orbiting ring-like structure is unstable due to gravity. Yes, even Saturn rings and Asteroid Belt in Solar System are unstable: they constantly lose and rearrange "particles". Asteroid belt is more an intersection of asteroid orbits, then some ring structure. There is always a tendency to form some clusters even inside Roche limit. It means that this liquid ring at best case would become the ring of water drops, blobs and one or two liquid planetoids (like in Saturn System they are needed for ring quasi-stability).
It can be easily understood if you consider the closer and outer parts of this ring, and also ring at periapsis and apoapsis. They would always have considerable velocity difference, resulting in massive whirls forming. Those whirls would inevitably separate and form planetoids, which would then evolve to something like Saturn's rings & moons, or to a single planet (depending on starting mass and orbit)
Сontinuous liquid ring is impossible.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
ksbesksbes
1,1911 silver badge8 bronze badges
1,1911 silver badge8 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think I read or heard somewhere that Saturn's rings are slowly diminishing. Like slowly on an astronomical scale, e.g. give it another few million years and they'll be pretty much gone. As an example, they cited that Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have faint rings that are further along in the process. Might be a bit of a search to remember where I saw that...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not too mention that water in space won't remain liquid. It will boil away, then the steam will quickly freeze solid. Solar wind will push on it like it does with comet tails, and instead of a ring of water, you'll quickly have some fine mist made of snow and ice scattered around.
$endgroup$
– vsz
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are a few points
Friction: If your water needs to be high up enough so that it isn't affected by the friction of particles in the atmosphere which will slow it down and eventually cause it to rain down.
Solar Winds: Your water needs to be in the atmosphere to offer it protection from solar winds. If it is too high, the solar winds will hit your water and eventually strip it from the planet or cause it to enter the atmosphere. This conflicts with the Friction part.
Space: Space is essentially a vacuum and when water is placed in a vacuum it will first boil and then freeze, creating a powder of frozen ice crystals. Basically your water needs to be close enough to the sun, so that it can remain in a liquid state, however at this height, it will be close enough to the sun to be impacted by solar winds. This will cause a conflict with the Solar Winds Part.
Asteroids: There are a lot of asteroids that hit the earths atmosphere and burn up. Unfortunately, due to the amount of light pollution, we cannot see them unless we are in very remote places. If your layer of water is outside of the atmosphere, the asteroids will hit your water rings and cause it to rain back down on earth. After several million years, there won't be much left (especially since water will try to stick to itself due to surface tension).
Surface Tension: Water doesn't like to act alone. It likes to stick to itself and link up. Anything that impacts a pure water ring will have rippling effects along the entire ring as the shock is dispersed through the water. Anything outside of a perfect laminar flowing ring of water will cause small discrepancies and a buildup in volume at one location which will eventually cause it to be pulled down. For examples of water tension in space have a look at the videos on the international space station. It will literally stick to your skin.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are a few points
Friction: If your water needs to be high up enough so that it isn't affected by the friction of particles in the atmosphere which will slow it down and eventually cause it to rain down.
Solar Winds: Your water needs to be in the atmosphere to offer it protection from solar winds. If it is too high, the solar winds will hit your water and eventually strip it from the planet or cause it to enter the atmosphere. This conflicts with the Friction part.
Space: Space is essentially a vacuum and when water is placed in a vacuum it will first boil and then freeze, creating a powder of frozen ice crystals. Basically your water needs to be close enough to the sun, so that it can remain in a liquid state, however at this height, it will be close enough to the sun to be impacted by solar winds. This will cause a conflict with the Solar Winds Part.
Asteroids: There are a lot of asteroids that hit the earths atmosphere and burn up. Unfortunately, due to the amount of light pollution, we cannot see them unless we are in very remote places. If your layer of water is outside of the atmosphere, the asteroids will hit your water rings and cause it to rain back down on earth. After several million years, there won't be much left (especially since water will try to stick to itself due to surface tension).
Surface Tension: Water doesn't like to act alone. It likes to stick to itself and link up. Anything that impacts a pure water ring will have rippling effects along the entire ring as the shock is dispersed through the water. Anything outside of a perfect laminar flowing ring of water will cause small discrepancies and a buildup in volume at one location which will eventually cause it to be pulled down. For examples of water tension in space have a look at the videos on the international space station. It will literally stick to your skin.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are a few points
Friction: If your water needs to be high up enough so that it isn't affected by the friction of particles in the atmosphere which will slow it down and eventually cause it to rain down.
Solar Winds: Your water needs to be in the atmosphere to offer it protection from solar winds. If it is too high, the solar winds will hit your water and eventually strip it from the planet or cause it to enter the atmosphere. This conflicts with the Friction part.
Space: Space is essentially a vacuum and when water is placed in a vacuum it will first boil and then freeze, creating a powder of frozen ice crystals. Basically your water needs to be close enough to the sun, so that it can remain in a liquid state, however at this height, it will be close enough to the sun to be impacted by solar winds. This will cause a conflict with the Solar Winds Part.
Asteroids: There are a lot of asteroids that hit the earths atmosphere and burn up. Unfortunately, due to the amount of light pollution, we cannot see them unless we are in very remote places. If your layer of water is outside of the atmosphere, the asteroids will hit your water rings and cause it to rain back down on earth. After several million years, there won't be much left (especially since water will try to stick to itself due to surface tension).
Surface Tension: Water doesn't like to act alone. It likes to stick to itself and link up. Anything that impacts a pure water ring will have rippling effects along the entire ring as the shock is dispersed through the water. Anything outside of a perfect laminar flowing ring of water will cause small discrepancies and a buildup in volume at one location which will eventually cause it to be pulled down. For examples of water tension in space have a look at the videos on the international space station. It will literally stick to your skin.
$endgroup$
Here are a few points
Friction: If your water needs to be high up enough so that it isn't affected by the friction of particles in the atmosphere which will slow it down and eventually cause it to rain down.
Solar Winds: Your water needs to be in the atmosphere to offer it protection from solar winds. If it is too high, the solar winds will hit your water and eventually strip it from the planet or cause it to enter the atmosphere. This conflicts with the Friction part.
Space: Space is essentially a vacuum and when water is placed in a vacuum it will first boil and then freeze, creating a powder of frozen ice crystals. Basically your water needs to be close enough to the sun, so that it can remain in a liquid state, however at this height, it will be close enough to the sun to be impacted by solar winds. This will cause a conflict with the Solar Winds Part.
Asteroids: There are a lot of asteroids that hit the earths atmosphere and burn up. Unfortunately, due to the amount of light pollution, we cannot see them unless we are in very remote places. If your layer of water is outside of the atmosphere, the asteroids will hit your water rings and cause it to rain back down on earth. After several million years, there won't be much left (especially since water will try to stick to itself due to surface tension).
Surface Tension: Water doesn't like to act alone. It likes to stick to itself and link up. Anything that impacts a pure water ring will have rippling effects along the entire ring as the shock is dispersed through the water. Anything outside of a perfect laminar flowing ring of water will cause small discrepancies and a buildup in volume at one location which will eventually cause it to be pulled down. For examples of water tension in space have a look at the videos on the international space station. It will literally stick to your skin.
answered 12 hours ago
ShadowzeeShadowzee
12.1k22 silver badges51 bronze badges
12.1k22 silver badges51 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Liquid is hard to get in space: you can get either solid or gas. You therefore might get ice particles of various size, or water vapor.
Ice would slowly sublimate to gas, and gas would be blown away by the stellar wind. The rate at which this happens would depend on the distance from the star. On the far side of the goldilocks zone ices can live as long as the star.
But they won't form a ring all around the orbit, unless they are extremely sparse. If they are dense enough, gravity will soon coalesce them into a single body.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Liquid is hard to get in space: you can get either solid or gas. You therefore might get ice particles of various size, or water vapor.
Ice would slowly sublimate to gas, and gas would be blown away by the stellar wind. The rate at which this happens would depend on the distance from the star. On the far side of the goldilocks zone ices can live as long as the star.
But they won't form a ring all around the orbit, unless they are extremely sparse. If they are dense enough, gravity will soon coalesce them into a single body.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Liquid is hard to get in space: you can get either solid or gas. You therefore might get ice particles of various size, or water vapor.
Ice would slowly sublimate to gas, and gas would be blown away by the stellar wind. The rate at which this happens would depend on the distance from the star. On the far side of the goldilocks zone ices can live as long as the star.
But they won't form a ring all around the orbit, unless they are extremely sparse. If they are dense enough, gravity will soon coalesce them into a single body.
$endgroup$
Liquid is hard to get in space: you can get either solid or gas. You therefore might get ice particles of various size, or water vapor.
Ice would slowly sublimate to gas, and gas would be blown away by the stellar wind. The rate at which this happens would depend on the distance from the star. On the far side of the goldilocks zone ices can live as long as the star.
But they won't form a ring all around the orbit, unless they are extremely sparse. If they are dense enough, gravity will soon coalesce them into a single body.
answered 12 hours ago
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
108k33 gold badges256 silver badges520 bronze badges
108k33 gold badges256 silver badges520 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Friction of the fluid against itself as a wave-propagating medium results in local concentrations of density, and ultimately in the continuous material being broken up. The only stable condition for fluid particles is that they must isolate themselves from the wave field through cohesion into local, disconnected bodies or else lose energy to internal motion and fall from their orbit.
It was James Clerk Maxwell who first discovered that rings around a planetary body (including a star) could not possibly consist of a contiguous fluid:
"Supposing the ring to be fluid and continuous, we found that it will
be necessarily broken up into small portions. We conclude, therefore,
that the rings must consist of disconnected particles; these may be
either solid or liquid, but they must be independent. The entire
system of rings must therefore consist either of a series of many
concentric rings, each moving with its own velocity, and having its
own systems of waves, or else of a confused multitude of revolving
particles, not arranged in rings, and continually coming into
collision with each other."
https://archive.org/details/onstabilityofmot00maxw/page/66
Incidentally, it was in this work that Maxwell derived the Criterion for the Stability of a Dynamical System, which is the key to all modern control theory and practice, including robots, automobiles, airplanes, biochemical control, and so on.
Mankind learned how to stabilize mechanical engines and to create robots using sensor feedback loops for control as a direct consequence of Maxwell's investigation into Saturn's rings.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Friction of the fluid against itself as a wave-propagating medium results in local concentrations of density, and ultimately in the continuous material being broken up. The only stable condition for fluid particles is that they must isolate themselves from the wave field through cohesion into local, disconnected bodies or else lose energy to internal motion and fall from their orbit.
It was James Clerk Maxwell who first discovered that rings around a planetary body (including a star) could not possibly consist of a contiguous fluid:
"Supposing the ring to be fluid and continuous, we found that it will
be necessarily broken up into small portions. We conclude, therefore,
that the rings must consist of disconnected particles; these may be
either solid or liquid, but they must be independent. The entire
system of rings must therefore consist either of a series of many
concentric rings, each moving with its own velocity, and having its
own systems of waves, or else of a confused multitude of revolving
particles, not arranged in rings, and continually coming into
collision with each other."
https://archive.org/details/onstabilityofmot00maxw/page/66
Incidentally, it was in this work that Maxwell derived the Criterion for the Stability of a Dynamical System, which is the key to all modern control theory and practice, including robots, automobiles, airplanes, biochemical control, and so on.
Mankind learned how to stabilize mechanical engines and to create robots using sensor feedback loops for control as a direct consequence of Maxwell's investigation into Saturn's rings.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Friction of the fluid against itself as a wave-propagating medium results in local concentrations of density, and ultimately in the continuous material being broken up. The only stable condition for fluid particles is that they must isolate themselves from the wave field through cohesion into local, disconnected bodies or else lose energy to internal motion and fall from their orbit.
It was James Clerk Maxwell who first discovered that rings around a planetary body (including a star) could not possibly consist of a contiguous fluid:
"Supposing the ring to be fluid and continuous, we found that it will
be necessarily broken up into small portions. We conclude, therefore,
that the rings must consist of disconnected particles; these may be
either solid or liquid, but they must be independent. The entire
system of rings must therefore consist either of a series of many
concentric rings, each moving with its own velocity, and having its
own systems of waves, or else of a confused multitude of revolving
particles, not arranged in rings, and continually coming into
collision with each other."
https://archive.org/details/onstabilityofmot00maxw/page/66
Incidentally, it was in this work that Maxwell derived the Criterion for the Stability of a Dynamical System, which is the key to all modern control theory and practice, including robots, automobiles, airplanes, biochemical control, and so on.
Mankind learned how to stabilize mechanical engines and to create robots using sensor feedback loops for control as a direct consequence of Maxwell's investigation into Saturn's rings.
$endgroup$
Friction of the fluid against itself as a wave-propagating medium results in local concentrations of density, and ultimately in the continuous material being broken up. The only stable condition for fluid particles is that they must isolate themselves from the wave field through cohesion into local, disconnected bodies or else lose energy to internal motion and fall from their orbit.
It was James Clerk Maxwell who first discovered that rings around a planetary body (including a star) could not possibly consist of a contiguous fluid:
"Supposing the ring to be fluid and continuous, we found that it will
be necessarily broken up into small portions. We conclude, therefore,
that the rings must consist of disconnected particles; these may be
either solid or liquid, but they must be independent. The entire
system of rings must therefore consist either of a series of many
concentric rings, each moving with its own velocity, and having its
own systems of waves, or else of a confused multitude of revolving
particles, not arranged in rings, and continually coming into
collision with each other."
https://archive.org/details/onstabilityofmot00maxw/page/66
Incidentally, it was in this work that Maxwell derived the Criterion for the Stability of a Dynamical System, which is the key to all modern control theory and practice, including robots, automobiles, airplanes, biochemical control, and so on.
Mankind learned how to stabilize mechanical engines and to create robots using sensor feedback loops for control as a direct consequence of Maxwell's investigation into Saturn's rings.
answered 24 mins ago
pygoscelespygosceles
2211 silver badge3 bronze badges
2211 silver badge3 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it is impossible:
Liquid water cannot exist at pressures below 0.006Bar so in order to have liquid water in free orbit around a star you would first need a gas torus. Now the highest density we've directly observed in such a torus is around the planet Jupiter it has an amazing 2000 particles per cubic centimetre (that's not in any way measurable as a pressure). Getting a torus dense enough around a normal star is probably not realistic, there is a possible solution for forming such a torus but I'm not completely sure that it's accuracy.
Conditions which allow you to have liquid water are almost impossible but even if you could have them a water ring wouldn't be stable. Due to differences in the orbital velocity and momentum of various parts of the ring very few water molecules are actually moving in identical orbital tracks. Parts of the ring are moving in close to the same way as each other but not the same way as their neighbours, this will cause the ring to disintegrate into smaller and smaller droplets as smaller and smaller differences in velocity add up. You could have a thick ring of air that is above 100% relative humidity such that water vapour was constantly coalescing into clouds, droplets and even larger spheroidal pools, lakes and oceans that are then pulled apart by gravitational and orbital forces but not a single permanently contiguous ring of liquid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it is impossible:
Liquid water cannot exist at pressures below 0.006Bar so in order to have liquid water in free orbit around a star you would first need a gas torus. Now the highest density we've directly observed in such a torus is around the planet Jupiter it has an amazing 2000 particles per cubic centimetre (that's not in any way measurable as a pressure). Getting a torus dense enough around a normal star is probably not realistic, there is a possible solution for forming such a torus but I'm not completely sure that it's accuracy.
Conditions which allow you to have liquid water are almost impossible but even if you could have them a water ring wouldn't be stable. Due to differences in the orbital velocity and momentum of various parts of the ring very few water molecules are actually moving in identical orbital tracks. Parts of the ring are moving in close to the same way as each other but not the same way as their neighbours, this will cause the ring to disintegrate into smaller and smaller droplets as smaller and smaller differences in velocity add up. You could have a thick ring of air that is above 100% relative humidity such that water vapour was constantly coalescing into clouds, droplets and even larger spheroidal pools, lakes and oceans that are then pulled apart by gravitational and orbital forces but not a single permanently contiguous ring of liquid.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes it is impossible:
Liquid water cannot exist at pressures below 0.006Bar so in order to have liquid water in free orbit around a star you would first need a gas torus. Now the highest density we've directly observed in such a torus is around the planet Jupiter it has an amazing 2000 particles per cubic centimetre (that's not in any way measurable as a pressure). Getting a torus dense enough around a normal star is probably not realistic, there is a possible solution for forming such a torus but I'm not completely sure that it's accuracy.
Conditions which allow you to have liquid water are almost impossible but even if you could have them a water ring wouldn't be stable. Due to differences in the orbital velocity and momentum of various parts of the ring very few water molecules are actually moving in identical orbital tracks. Parts of the ring are moving in close to the same way as each other but not the same way as their neighbours, this will cause the ring to disintegrate into smaller and smaller droplets as smaller and smaller differences in velocity add up. You could have a thick ring of air that is above 100% relative humidity such that water vapour was constantly coalescing into clouds, droplets and even larger spheroidal pools, lakes and oceans that are then pulled apart by gravitational and orbital forces but not a single permanently contiguous ring of liquid.
$endgroup$
Yes it is impossible:
Liquid water cannot exist at pressures below 0.006Bar so in order to have liquid water in free orbit around a star you would first need a gas torus. Now the highest density we've directly observed in such a torus is around the planet Jupiter it has an amazing 2000 particles per cubic centimetre (that's not in any way measurable as a pressure). Getting a torus dense enough around a normal star is probably not realistic, there is a possible solution for forming such a torus but I'm not completely sure that it's accuracy.
Conditions which allow you to have liquid water are almost impossible but even if you could have them a water ring wouldn't be stable. Due to differences in the orbital velocity and momentum of various parts of the ring very few water molecules are actually moving in identical orbital tracks. Parts of the ring are moving in close to the same way as each other but not the same way as their neighbours, this will cause the ring to disintegrate into smaller and smaller droplets as smaller and smaller differences in velocity add up. You could have a thick ring of air that is above 100% relative humidity such that water vapour was constantly coalescing into clouds, droplets and even larger spheroidal pools, lakes and oceans that are then pulled apart by gravitational and orbital forces but not a single permanently contiguous ring of liquid.
answered 1 hour ago
AshAsh
33.9k5 gold badges80 silver badges179 bronze badges
33.9k5 gold badges80 silver badges179 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Carl Greifenkla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Carl Greifenkla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Carl Greifenkla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Carl Greifenkla is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152747%2fa-continuous-water-planet-ring-around-a-star%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
Reminder to close-voters: The problem cannot be fixed if the OP is not made aware of it.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Have you come across Niven's work, The Integral Trees? It covers a ring of inhabitable gas that was being continuously replenished by a gas giant in close orbit around a neutron star that was disintegrating. Although surface tension was not an issue, many of the same problems you're looking at were considered there, too.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
6 hours ago