Prove that in a row of 17 random integers there exist some integers written in succession (next to each...

How did Ron get five hundred Chocolate Frog cards?

Where is the 'zone of reversed commands...'?

Is Schrodinger's Cat itself an observer?

Is the value of a probability density function for a given input a point, a range, or both?

How do I find files with no group permissions?

"A tin of biscuits" vs "A biscuit tin"

"Table" method for expanding brackets vs "each term in the first bracket gets multiplied by each term in the second bracket"

Why are KDFs slow? Is using a KDF more secure than using the original secret?

Using Terminal` (ASCII plots) in Wolfram 12

How is Smough's name pronounced?

Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?

If the music alphabet had more than 7 letters would octaves still sound like the same note?

Why "come" instead of "go"?

Do I need to explicitly handle negative numbers or zero when summing squared digits?

Paper status "Accept with Shepherd". What does it really mean?

How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?

Why does this route work with a slash and not a dash?

Is it possible to cross Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak undetectable now?

Proofreading a novel: is it okay to use a question mark with an exclamation mark - "?!"

Usefulness of Nash embedding theorem

My Villain scrys on the party, but I forgot about the sensor!

What is the fastest algorithm for finding the natural logarithm of a big number?

Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?

Is there any restriction in entering the South American countries multiple times in one year?



Prove that in a row of 17 random integers there exist some integers written in succession (next to each other), whose sum is divisible by 17. [duplicate]


In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?Let $S={3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}$. Suppose 6 integers are chosen from S. Must there be 2 integers whose sum is 15?Prove that if $|S| ge 2^{n−1} + 1$, then $S$ contains two elements which are disjoint from each other.Let S be a set of n integers. Show that there is a subset of S, sum of whose elements is a multiple of n by pigeon holeProve that any $6$- subset of integers ${1…14}$ is always the union of two distinct subsets of equal sumProve that given any five integers, there will be three for which the sum of the squares of those integers is divisible by 3.






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








3














$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?

    1 answer




I presume I have to use the pigeonhole principle here, but so far no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$






marked as duplicate by MJD, Javi, Shailesh, nmasanta, Feng Shao 20 mins ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago


















3














$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?

    1 answer




I presume I have to use the pigeonhole principle here, but so far no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$






marked as duplicate by MJD, Javi, Shailesh, nmasanta, Feng Shao 20 mins ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?

    1 answer




I presume I have to use the pigeonhole principle here, but so far no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?

    1 answer




I presume I have to use the pigeonhole principle here, but so far no luck.





This question already has an answer here:




  • In a sequence of $n$ integers, must there be a contiguous subsequence that sums to a multiple of $n$?

    1 answer








discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









N. F. Taussig

50k10 gold badges37 silver badges60 bronze badges




50k10 gold badges37 silver badges60 bronze badges






New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









BiobbbBiobbb

161 bronze badge




161 bronze badge




New contributor



Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Biobbb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







marked as duplicate by MJD, Javi, Shailesh, nmasanta, Feng Shao 20 mins ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











marked as duplicate by MJD, Javi, Shailesh, nmasanta, Feng Shao 20 mins ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by MJD, Javi, Shailesh, nmasanta, Feng Shao 20 mins ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
@Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dzoooks The OP says that the integers are random.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dzoooks You are allowed to take more than two integers. Or only one. Why do you think it isn't true if they are random?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dzoooks Read the first sentence of my last comment again. Or look at my answer.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3
















$begingroup$

Consider $$a_1,a_1+a_2,a_1+a_2+a_3,...,a_1+a_2+...a_{17}$$



If remainders in dividing by $17$ are different one has $0$ remainder otherwise two of them have the same remainders. In both cases the problem is solved.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$























    1
















    $begingroup$

    HINTS



    Let the numbers be $a_1,a_2,dots,a_{17}$ and let $s_k=sum_{i=1}^ka_i$ for $k=1,dots,17.$ If $s_jequiv s_kpmod{17}$ for some $j<k$ what can you conclude? Now finish it off with the pigeonhole principle.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3
















      $begingroup$

      Consider $$a_1,a_1+a_2,a_1+a_2+a_3,...,a_1+a_2+...a_{17}$$



      If remainders in dividing by $17$ are different one has $0$ remainder otherwise two of them have the same remainders. In both cases the problem is solved.






      share|cite|improve this answer












      $endgroup$




















        3
















        $begingroup$

        Consider $$a_1,a_1+a_2,a_1+a_2+a_3,...,a_1+a_2+...a_{17}$$



        If remainders in dividing by $17$ are different one has $0$ remainder otherwise two of them have the same remainders. In both cases the problem is solved.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $endgroup$


















          3














          3










          3







          $begingroup$

          Consider $$a_1,a_1+a_2,a_1+a_2+a_3,...,a_1+a_2+...a_{17}$$



          If remainders in dividing by $17$ are different one has $0$ remainder otherwise two of them have the same remainders. In both cases the problem is solved.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $endgroup$



          Consider $$a_1,a_1+a_2,a_1+a_2+a_3,...,a_1+a_2+...a_{17}$$



          If remainders in dividing by $17$ are different one has $0$ remainder otherwise two of them have the same remainders. In both cases the problem is solved.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

          54.6k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges




          54.6k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges




























              1
















              $begingroup$

              HINTS



              Let the numbers be $a_1,a_2,dots,a_{17}$ and let $s_k=sum_{i=1}^ka_i$ for $k=1,dots,17.$ If $s_jequiv s_kpmod{17}$ for some $j<k$ what can you conclude? Now finish it off with the pigeonhole principle.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              $endgroup$




















                1
















                $begingroup$

                HINTS



                Let the numbers be $a_1,a_2,dots,a_{17}$ and let $s_k=sum_{i=1}^ka_i$ for $k=1,dots,17.$ If $s_jequiv s_kpmod{17}$ for some $j<k$ what can you conclude? Now finish it off with the pigeonhole principle.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                $endgroup$


















                  1














                  1










                  1







                  $begingroup$

                  HINTS



                  Let the numbers be $a_1,a_2,dots,a_{17}$ and let $s_k=sum_{i=1}^ka_i$ for $k=1,dots,17.$ If $s_jequiv s_kpmod{17}$ for some $j<k$ what can you conclude? Now finish it off with the pigeonhole principle.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $endgroup$



                  HINTS



                  Let the numbers be $a_1,a_2,dots,a_{17}$ and let $s_k=sum_{i=1}^ka_i$ for $k=1,dots,17.$ If $s_jequiv s_kpmod{17}$ for some $j<k$ what can you conclude? Now finish it off with the pigeonhole principle.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago









                  MJD

                  49k31 gold badges219 silver badges408 bronze badges




                  49k31 gold badges219 silver badges408 bronze badges










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  saulspatzsaulspatz

                  25.4k4 gold badges16 silver badges42 bronze badges




                  25.4k4 gold badges16 silver badges42 bronze badges


















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

                      The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

                      Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...