How can I fix the label locations on my tikzcd diagram?Location of Labels with Crossing Arrows in Commuative...
What kind of environment would favor hermaphroditism in a sentient species over regular, old sexes?
Cannot remove door knob -- totally inaccessible!
Omit property variable when using object destructuring
Why would you put your input amplifier in front of your filtering for and ECG signal?
How to handle professionally if colleagues has referred his relative and asking to take easy while taking interview
When did Britain learn about American independence?
What is this rubber on gear cables
Why is Drogon so much better in battle than Rhaegal and Viserion?
Why does string strummed with finger sound different from the one strummed with pick?
Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?
FIFO data structure in pure C
Usage of the relative pronoun "dont"
Why are there five extra turns in tournament Magic?
How could it be that 80% of townspeople were farmers during the Edo period in Japan?
Why is so much ransomware breakable?
multiline equation inside a matrix that is a part of multiline equation
Resistor Selection to retain same brightness in LED PWM circuit
Is it standard for US-based universities to consider the ethnicity of an applicant during PhD admissions?
What color to choose as "danger" if the main color of my app is red
Why use a retrograde orbit?
Why is vowel phonology represented in a trapezoid instead of a square?
Who is frowning in the sentence "Daisy looked at Tom frowning"?
Does a non-singular matrix have a large minor with disjoint rows and columns and full rank?
Would it be fair to use 1d30 (instead of rolling 2d20 and taking the higher die) for advantage rolls?
How can I fix the label locations on my tikzcd diagram?
Location of Labels with Crossing Arrows in Commuative Diagrams with tikzcdproblem making a commutative diagram in tikz using positioning libraryWhy do I get an extra white page before my TikZ picture?Adjusting the width of a displaymath environmentHow to label an arrow in a commutative diagramHow to draw a square and its diagonals with arrows?Tikz-cd arrow labels are not on the same heightArrow type Rightarrow in tikz-cd displayed not correctlyCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesRotating label of arrow along the arrowHow to modify a tikz-cd diagram by changing the placement and length of arrows
I am having trouble with the label locations on my commutative diagram.
Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & N-1 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}
which produces

I would like the arrow labels to appear "centered" on the arrows, as they are in the second diagram, but with the node labels from the first diagram. How can I fix this?
Note: I have already looked at the question here and know that I could probably manually correct the spacing on every single label, but that seems way more tedious than should be necessary given that I'm pretty sure the labels should be centered on the arrows by default.
tikz-pgf tikz-cd
add a comment |
I am having trouble with the label locations on my commutative diagram.
Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & N-1 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}
which produces

I would like the arrow labels to appear "centered" on the arrows, as they are in the second diagram, but with the node labels from the first diagram. How can I fix this?
Note: I have already looked at the question here and know that I could probably manually correct the spacing on every single label, but that seems way more tedious than should be necessary given that I'm pretty sure the labels should be centered on the arrows by default.
tikz-pgf tikz-cd
add a comment |
I am having trouble with the label locations on my commutative diagram.
Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & N-1 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}
which produces

I would like the arrow labels to appear "centered" on the arrows, as they are in the second diagram, but with the node labels from the first diagram. How can I fix this?
Note: I have already looked at the question here and know that I could probably manually correct the spacing on every single label, but that seems way more tedious than should be necessary given that I'm pretty sure the labels should be centered on the arrows by default.
tikz-pgf tikz-cd
I am having trouble with the label locations on my commutative diagram.
Here is my code:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & N-1 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}
which produces

I would like the arrow labels to appear "centered" on the arrows, as they are in the second diagram, but with the node labels from the first diagram. How can I fix this?
Note: I have already looked at the question here and know that I could probably manually correct the spacing on every single label, but that seems way more tedious than should be necessary given that I'm pretty sure the labels should be centered on the arrows by default.
tikz-pgf tikz-cd
tikz-pgf tikz-cd
asked 6 hours ago
Abe SchulteAbe Schulte
419214
419214
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
What happens here? auto gets screwed up.
Why does it happen? See below.
Can one fix it? Yes, at least in an ad hoc way.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
tikzcdset{ad hoc fix/.style={r'/.style={r,/tikz/above},l'/.style={l,/tikz/below},
every label/.append style={/tikz/auto=false}}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=&,ad hoc fix]
0 arrow[r', "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r', "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r', "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r', "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r', "lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l', "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The reason why this happens is that the arrows have different vertical positions of start and end points. This can be seen from
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &,every label/.append style={sloped}]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r,"lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

add a comment |
Misplacement of arrow labels you can be reduce by increasing the bend angles. With this you slightly change the position of the start and end of the arrows for longer nodes' names. For example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[sep=large,
every arrow/.style={draw,->,bend left=45}, % for shorter diagram code
]
0 ar[r, "Nlambda"]
& 1 ar[r, "(N - 1)lambda"]
ar[l, "lambda"]
& 2 ar[r, "(N - 2)lambda"]
ar[l, "2lambda"]
& cdots ar[r, "2lambda"]
ar[l, "3lambda"]
& N-1 ar[r, "lambda"]
ar[l, "(N-1)lambda"]
& N ar[l, "Nlambda"]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you haveN-1-2in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this toN-1?
– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Looks like a good application for tikz's chain library :
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{automata,chains,positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
auto,
start chain = going right,
state/.append style = {
on chain,
draw=none,
},
]
node (s0)[state] {$0$};
node (s1)[state] {$1$};
node (s2)[state] {$2$};
draw[->] (s0) edge[bend left] node {$Nlambda$} (s1)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$lambda$} (s0)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$(N-1)lambda$} (s2)
(s2) edge[bend left] node {$2lambda$} (s1)
;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491008%2fhow-can-i-fix-the-label-locations-on-my-tikzcd-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What happens here? auto gets screwed up.
Why does it happen? See below.
Can one fix it? Yes, at least in an ad hoc way.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
tikzcdset{ad hoc fix/.style={r'/.style={r,/tikz/above},l'/.style={l,/tikz/below},
every label/.append style={/tikz/auto=false}}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=&,ad hoc fix]
0 arrow[r', "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r', "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r', "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r', "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r', "lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l', "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The reason why this happens is that the arrows have different vertical positions of start and end points. This can be seen from
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &,every label/.append style={sloped}]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r,"lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

add a comment |
What happens here? auto gets screwed up.
Why does it happen? See below.
Can one fix it? Yes, at least in an ad hoc way.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
tikzcdset{ad hoc fix/.style={r'/.style={r,/tikz/above},l'/.style={l,/tikz/below},
every label/.append style={/tikz/auto=false}}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=&,ad hoc fix]
0 arrow[r', "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r', "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r', "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r', "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r', "lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l', "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The reason why this happens is that the arrows have different vertical positions of start and end points. This can be seen from
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &,every label/.append style={sloped}]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r,"lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

add a comment |
What happens here? auto gets screwed up.
Why does it happen? See below.
Can one fix it? Yes, at least in an ad hoc way.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
tikzcdset{ad hoc fix/.style={r'/.style={r,/tikz/above},l'/.style={l,/tikz/below},
every label/.append style={/tikz/auto=false}}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=&,ad hoc fix]
0 arrow[r', "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r', "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r', "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r', "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r', "lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l', "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The reason why this happens is that the arrows have different vertical positions of start and end points. This can be seen from
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &,every label/.append style={sloped}]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r,"lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

What happens here? auto gets screwed up.
Why does it happen? See below.
Can one fix it? Yes, at least in an ad hoc way.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
tikzcdset{ad hoc fix/.style={r'/.style={r,/tikz/above},l'/.style={l,/tikz/below},
every label/.append style={/tikz/auto=false}}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement=&,ad hoc fix]
0 arrow[r', "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r', "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r', "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r', "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r', "lambda", bend left] arrow[l', "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l', "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] & 1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] & 2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] & 3 arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] & 4 arrow[r, "lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] & 5 arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The reason why this happens is that the arrows have different vertical positions of start and end points. This can be seen from
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[ampersand replacement = &,every label/.append style={sloped}]
0 arrow[r, "Nlambda", bend left] &
1 arrow[r, "(N - 1)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "lambda", bend left] &
2 arrow[r, "(N - 2)lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "2lambda", bend left] &
cdots arrow[r, "2lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "3lambda", bend left] &
N-1 arrow[r,"lambda", bend left] arrow[l, "(N-1)lambda", bend left] &
N arrow[l, "Nlambda", bend left]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
marmotmarmot
127k6162308
127k6162308
add a comment |
add a comment |
Misplacement of arrow labels you can be reduce by increasing the bend angles. With this you slightly change the position of the start and end of the arrows for longer nodes' names. For example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[sep=large,
every arrow/.style={draw,->,bend left=45}, % for shorter diagram code
]
0 ar[r, "Nlambda"]
& 1 ar[r, "(N - 1)lambda"]
ar[l, "lambda"]
& 2 ar[r, "(N - 2)lambda"]
ar[l, "2lambda"]
& cdots ar[r, "2lambda"]
ar[l, "3lambda"]
& N-1 ar[r, "lambda"]
ar[l, "(N-1)lambda"]
& N ar[l, "Nlambda"]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you haveN-1-2in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this toN-1?
– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Misplacement of arrow labels you can be reduce by increasing the bend angles. With this you slightly change the position of the start and end of the arrows for longer nodes' names. For example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[sep=large,
every arrow/.style={draw,->,bend left=45}, % for shorter diagram code
]
0 ar[r, "Nlambda"]
& 1 ar[r, "(N - 1)lambda"]
ar[l, "lambda"]
& 2 ar[r, "(N - 2)lambda"]
ar[l, "2lambda"]
& cdots ar[r, "2lambda"]
ar[l, "3lambda"]
& N-1 ar[r, "lambda"]
ar[l, "(N-1)lambda"]
& N ar[l, "Nlambda"]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you haveN-1-2in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this toN-1?
– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Misplacement of arrow labels you can be reduce by increasing the bend angles. With this you slightly change the position of the start and end of the arrows for longer nodes' names. For example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[sep=large,
every arrow/.style={draw,->,bend left=45}, % for shorter diagram code
]
0 ar[r, "Nlambda"]
& 1 ar[r, "(N - 1)lambda"]
ar[l, "lambda"]
& 2 ar[r, "(N - 2)lambda"]
ar[l, "2lambda"]
& cdots ar[r, "2lambda"]
ar[l, "3lambda"]
& N-1 ar[r, "lambda"]
ar[l, "(N-1)lambda"]
& N ar[l, "Nlambda"]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

Misplacement of arrow labels you can be reduce by increasing the bend angles. With this you slightly change the position of the start and end of the arrows for longer nodes' names. For example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
begin{tikzcd}[sep=large,
every arrow/.style={draw,->,bend left=45}, % for shorter diagram code
]
0 ar[r, "Nlambda"]
& 1 ar[r, "(N - 1)lambda"]
ar[l, "lambda"]
& 2 ar[r, "(N - 2)lambda"]
ar[l, "2lambda"]
& cdots ar[r, "2lambda"]
ar[l, "3lambda"]
& N-1 ar[r, "lambda"]
ar[l, "(N-1)lambda"]
& N ar[l, "Nlambda"]
end{tikzcd}
end{document}

edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
ZarkoZarko
134k872178
134k872178
The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you haveN-1-2in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this toN-1?
– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you haveN-1-2in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this toN-1?
– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
The output is not produced when running your code.
– marmot
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
hm, I check the code again and obtain the same result as i show in answer. I use recent MikTeX (updated yesterday) on w10 machine.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
@Åke, thank you very much !
– Zarko
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you have
N-1-2 in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this to N-1?– marmot
3 hours ago
No. For instance, you have
N-1-2 in your code. Are you saying MikTeX converts this to N-1?– marmot
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
ups, @marmoth you are right. Thank you very much to pointed to this. I didn't notice this, I just looked position of arrows labels. i will correct this asap. this left from some previous test ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Looks like a good application for tikz's chain library :
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{automata,chains,positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
auto,
start chain = going right,
state/.append style = {
on chain,
draw=none,
},
]
node (s0)[state] {$0$};
node (s1)[state] {$1$};
node (s2)[state] {$2$};
draw[->] (s0) edge[bend left] node {$Nlambda$} (s1)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$lambda$} (s0)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$(N-1)lambda$} (s2)
(s2) edge[bend left] node {$2lambda$} (s1)
;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Looks like a good application for tikz's chain library :
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{automata,chains,positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
auto,
start chain = going right,
state/.append style = {
on chain,
draw=none,
},
]
node (s0)[state] {$0$};
node (s1)[state] {$1$};
node (s2)[state] {$2$};
draw[->] (s0) edge[bend left] node {$Nlambda$} (s1)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$lambda$} (s0)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$(N-1)lambda$} (s2)
(s2) edge[bend left] node {$2lambda$} (s1)
;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Looks like a good application for tikz's chain library :
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{automata,chains,positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
auto,
start chain = going right,
state/.append style = {
on chain,
draw=none,
},
]
node (s0)[state] {$0$};
node (s1)[state] {$1$};
node (s2)[state] {$2$};
draw[->] (s0) edge[bend left] node {$Nlambda$} (s1)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$lambda$} (s0)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$(N-1)lambda$} (s2)
(s2) edge[bend left] node {$2lambda$} (s1)
;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Looks like a good application for tikz's chain library :
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{automata,chains,positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[
auto,
start chain = going right,
state/.append style = {
on chain,
draw=none,
},
]
node (s0)[state] {$0$};
node (s1)[state] {$1$};
node (s2)[state] {$2$};
draw[->] (s0) edge[bend left] node {$Nlambda$} (s1)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$lambda$} (s0)
(s1) edge[bend left] node {$(N-1)lambda$} (s2)
(s2) edge[bend left] node {$2lambda$} (s1)
;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
ÅkeÅke
274
274
New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Åke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491008%2fhow-can-i-fix-the-label-locations-on-my-tikzcd-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown