Can mxd files be under version control?Keeping track of changes to MXD files using version control?Which Esri...

Could you sell yourself into slavery in the USA?

Platform Event Design when Subscribers are Apex Triggers

Is it possible that Curiosity measured its own methane or failed doing the spectrometry?

Are there advantages in writing by hand over typing out a story?

Can 4 Joy cons connect to the same Switch?

What can a novel do that film and TV cannot?

How to deal with a Murder Hobo Paladin?

Interview Question - Card betting

Who pays for increased security measures on flights to the US?

Park the computer

Minimizing medical costs with HSA

Can mxd files be under version control?

Should I cheat if the majority does it?

How can solar sailed ships be protected from space debris?

Why did moving the mouse cursor cause Windows 95 to run more quickly?

Using Sed to add counter to keyword

Is it possible to spoof an IP address to an exact number?

How did שְׁלֹמֹה (shlomo) become Solomon?

What is the maximum amount of diamond in one Minecraft game?

Show that there are infinitely more problems than we will ever be able to compute

Sleepy tired vs physically tired

Do I need to be legally qualified to install a Hive smart thermostat?

Does a multiclassed wizard start with a spellbook?

Why did C++11 make std::string::data() add a null terminating character?



Can mxd files be under version control?


Keeping track of changes to MXD files using version control?Which Esri software is needed to open MXD files?Where to find .mxd examples for ArcGIS 10Implementing version control system for geospatial data?Checking .mxd version using ArcPy?how to open several MXD files at the same time ( within the same window )in Arcgis10Enabling preview pane of Windows Explorer for mxd files?ArcGIS corrupting MXD-files on certain usersMXD files in ArcGISUnable to open mxd file on my computer - can be opened on other computers






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Is it recommended to have Esri ArcMap MXD files under version control e.g. stored on SVN or TFS?










share|improve this question































    1















    Is it recommended to have Esri ArcMap MXD files under version control e.g. stored on SVN or TFS?










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      Is it recommended to have Esri ArcMap MXD files under version control e.g. stored on SVN or TFS?










      share|improve this question
















      Is it recommended to have Esri ArcMap MXD files under version control e.g. stored on SVN or TFS?







      arcgis-desktop mxd version-control






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      PolyGeo

      54.5k17 gold badges84 silver badges253 bronze badges




      54.5k17 gold badges84 silver badges253 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      mnavidadmnavidad

      472 bronze badges




      472 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          "Recommended" is subjective to your own organization needs and requirements. We can't really answer that question.



          Instead, if you're asking "can I put an MXD into source control"? Generally, yes you can put anything into source control.



          The problem with putting an MXD (binary file) into source control is there isn't a way for SC to understand differences. All it'll know is "the file is different in someway".
          So using SC for MXDs could be good for backup purposes. You corrupt or delete your MXD from today. Go grab yesterday's version from SC. I've worked with a few organizations who put their MXDs into Microsoft TFS. It allows many people to access MXDs and do updates: you then have a record who last updated it. Compared to a group of people trying to work off a single MXD on a network drive. So it suits their needs, it just doesn't benefit from seeing the particular changes to the MXD from checkin to checkin.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

            – mnavidad
            6 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f327573%2fcan-mxd-files-be-under-version-control%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          "Recommended" is subjective to your own organization needs and requirements. We can't really answer that question.



          Instead, if you're asking "can I put an MXD into source control"? Generally, yes you can put anything into source control.



          The problem with putting an MXD (binary file) into source control is there isn't a way for SC to understand differences. All it'll know is "the file is different in someway".
          So using SC for MXDs could be good for backup purposes. You corrupt or delete your MXD from today. Go grab yesterday's version from SC. I've worked with a few organizations who put their MXDs into Microsoft TFS. It allows many people to access MXDs and do updates: you then have a record who last updated it. Compared to a group of people trying to work off a single MXD on a network drive. So it suits their needs, it just doesn't benefit from seeing the particular changes to the MXD from checkin to checkin.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

            – mnavidad
            6 hours ago
















          5














          "Recommended" is subjective to your own organization needs and requirements. We can't really answer that question.



          Instead, if you're asking "can I put an MXD into source control"? Generally, yes you can put anything into source control.



          The problem with putting an MXD (binary file) into source control is there isn't a way for SC to understand differences. All it'll know is "the file is different in someway".
          So using SC for MXDs could be good for backup purposes. You corrupt or delete your MXD from today. Go grab yesterday's version from SC. I've worked with a few organizations who put their MXDs into Microsoft TFS. It allows many people to access MXDs and do updates: you then have a record who last updated it. Compared to a group of people trying to work off a single MXD on a network drive. So it suits their needs, it just doesn't benefit from seeing the particular changes to the MXD from checkin to checkin.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

            – mnavidad
            6 hours ago














          5












          5








          5







          "Recommended" is subjective to your own organization needs and requirements. We can't really answer that question.



          Instead, if you're asking "can I put an MXD into source control"? Generally, yes you can put anything into source control.



          The problem with putting an MXD (binary file) into source control is there isn't a way for SC to understand differences. All it'll know is "the file is different in someway".
          So using SC for MXDs could be good for backup purposes. You corrupt or delete your MXD from today. Go grab yesterday's version from SC. I've worked with a few organizations who put their MXDs into Microsoft TFS. It allows many people to access MXDs and do updates: you then have a record who last updated it. Compared to a group of people trying to work off a single MXD on a network drive. So it suits their needs, it just doesn't benefit from seeing the particular changes to the MXD from checkin to checkin.






          share|improve this answer













          "Recommended" is subjective to your own organization needs and requirements. We can't really answer that question.



          Instead, if you're asking "can I put an MXD into source control"? Generally, yes you can put anything into source control.



          The problem with putting an MXD (binary file) into source control is there isn't a way for SC to understand differences. All it'll know is "the file is different in someway".
          So using SC for MXDs could be good for backup purposes. You corrupt or delete your MXD from today. Go grab yesterday's version from SC. I've worked with a few organizations who put their MXDs into Microsoft TFS. It allows many people to access MXDs and do updates: you then have a record who last updated it. Compared to a group of people trying to work off a single MXD on a network drive. So it suits their needs, it just doesn't benefit from seeing the particular changes to the MXD from checkin to checkin.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          KHibmaKHibma

          10.9k1 gold badge19 silver badges40 bronze badges




          10.9k1 gold badge19 silver badges40 bronze badges













          • Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

            – mnavidad
            6 hours ago



















          • Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

            – mnavidad
            6 hours ago

















          Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

          – mnavidad
          6 hours ago





          Thank you did not mean to sound vague, I was just wanted to know if it was best practices since I heard a lot of horror stories of MXD's getting corrupted

          – mnavidad
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f327573%2fcan-mxd-files-be-under-version-control%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...