Getting systemd service logs faster from my serviceOutput of a python script running as unit is out of order...

Could you sell yourself into slavery in the USA?

Does Evolution Sage proliferate Blast Zone when played?

Creating patterns

Is there a typical layout to blocking installed for backing in new construction framing?

How would an Amulet of Proof Against Detection and Location interact with the Comprehend Languages spell?

Taking advantage when the HR forgets to communicate the rules

What is this arch-and-tower near a road?

Are "confidant" and "confident" homophones?

Can mxd files be under version control?

What does it mean for a bass player to play "on the one"?

What is the addition in the re-released version of Avengers: Endgame?

Advice for making/keeping shredded chicken moist?

Will electrically joined dipoles of different lengths, at right angles, behave as a multiband antenna?

What are the differences of checking a self-signed certificate vs ignore it?

Can 4 Joy cons connect to the same Switch?

Platform Event Design when Subscribers are Apex Triggers

How did Einstein know the speed of light was constant?

PhD: When to quit and move on?

Is it possible to spoof an IP address to an exact number?

My players like to search everything. What do they find?

How should I present a resort brochure in my general fiction?

What units are kpts?

Did Snape really give Umbridge a fake Veritaserum potion that Harry later pretended to drink?

How serious is plagiarism in a master’s thesis?



Getting systemd service logs faster from my service


Output of a python script running as unit is out of order while shells seems unnafectedstderr gets flushed before stdout, when using file loggerDaemontools multilog loses log line time information. How to fix it?Systemd Python service not sending all output to syslogWhat controls the buffering of stdout stderr?systemd: process with fork() only shows logs after child exitsDebugging lock-up - systemd loses my logsSystemd logs only 3 lines of errorsWhy is systemd stopping service immediately after it is started?Instruct to execute an unit after completing another unit successfullyCan I mask the systemd-journal-flush service and run journalctl --flush later manually?systemd-journald missing crash logsredundant systemd-journal-remote for systemd-journal-upload instancesHow to watch output from systemd service?How do I work out which process/service/program is sending systemd dbus messages?How to append systemd service logs to the journal






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















I'm having a systemd service defined as follows, that works fine:



[Unit]
Description=my service
After=network.target

[Service]
User=myuser
Group=mygroup
WorkingDirectory=/home/myuser/myapp
Environment="PATH=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin"
ExecStart=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin/python3 /home/myuser/myapp/run.py
Restart=on-failure

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


This is a Python web application based on Flask framework. Normally in the stdout of the application I can see incoming requests "live", I mean when I run the app like python run.py.



Now after starting the service I'd like to follow logs of the app and I do:



sudo journalctl -f -u my_app.service


and incoming logs are awfully slow - sometimes it takes minutes or more for them to appear in logs. Afterwards they all have proper timestamp though, so it's not like they're disappearing, they do, but after a long time.



What I've tried:





  • to redirect systemd service output to files:



    StandardOutput=file:/var/log/my_app/output.log



    StandardError=file:/var/log/my_app/error.log



    with no luck - they save fine but with the same slow speed



  • to try to dump journalctl logs to offline faster setting SyncIntervalSec from default 5m to 5s - didn't help either



Is there any way to pass those logs faster from my application to journald? I don't have troubles with other services like system authentication ones - I see records immediately.
My journald.conf file has default parameters (except one above), my systemd is version 237 and I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 16:11






  • 1





    Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

    – JdeBP
    Mar 8 at 16:58













  • Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

    – adamczi
    Mar 8 at 17:28











  • @adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 17:39


















1















I'm having a systemd service defined as follows, that works fine:



[Unit]
Description=my service
After=network.target

[Service]
User=myuser
Group=mygroup
WorkingDirectory=/home/myuser/myapp
Environment="PATH=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin"
ExecStart=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin/python3 /home/myuser/myapp/run.py
Restart=on-failure

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


This is a Python web application based on Flask framework. Normally in the stdout of the application I can see incoming requests "live", I mean when I run the app like python run.py.



Now after starting the service I'd like to follow logs of the app and I do:



sudo journalctl -f -u my_app.service


and incoming logs are awfully slow - sometimes it takes minutes or more for them to appear in logs. Afterwards they all have proper timestamp though, so it's not like they're disappearing, they do, but after a long time.



What I've tried:





  • to redirect systemd service output to files:



    StandardOutput=file:/var/log/my_app/output.log



    StandardError=file:/var/log/my_app/error.log



    with no luck - they save fine but with the same slow speed



  • to try to dump journalctl logs to offline faster setting SyncIntervalSec from default 5m to 5s - didn't help either



Is there any way to pass those logs faster from my application to journald? I don't have troubles with other services like system authentication ones - I see records immediately.
My journald.conf file has default parameters (except one above), my systemd is version 237 and I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 16:11






  • 1





    Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

    – JdeBP
    Mar 8 at 16:58













  • Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

    – adamczi
    Mar 8 at 17:28











  • @adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 17:39














1












1








1








I'm having a systemd service defined as follows, that works fine:



[Unit]
Description=my service
After=network.target

[Service]
User=myuser
Group=mygroup
WorkingDirectory=/home/myuser/myapp
Environment="PATH=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin"
ExecStart=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin/python3 /home/myuser/myapp/run.py
Restart=on-failure

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


This is a Python web application based on Flask framework. Normally in the stdout of the application I can see incoming requests "live", I mean when I run the app like python run.py.



Now after starting the service I'd like to follow logs of the app and I do:



sudo journalctl -f -u my_app.service


and incoming logs are awfully slow - sometimes it takes minutes or more for them to appear in logs. Afterwards they all have proper timestamp though, so it's not like they're disappearing, they do, but after a long time.



What I've tried:





  • to redirect systemd service output to files:



    StandardOutput=file:/var/log/my_app/output.log



    StandardError=file:/var/log/my_app/error.log



    with no luck - they save fine but with the same slow speed



  • to try to dump journalctl logs to offline faster setting SyncIntervalSec from default 5m to 5s - didn't help either



Is there any way to pass those logs faster from my application to journald? I don't have troubles with other services like system authentication ones - I see records immediately.
My journald.conf file has default parameters (except one above), my systemd is version 237 and I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.










share|improve this question














I'm having a systemd service defined as follows, that works fine:



[Unit]
Description=my service
After=network.target

[Service]
User=myuser
Group=mygroup
WorkingDirectory=/home/myuser/myapp
Environment="PATH=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin"
ExecStart=/home/myuser/myapp/.venv/bin/python3 /home/myuser/myapp/run.py
Restart=on-failure

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target


This is a Python web application based on Flask framework. Normally in the stdout of the application I can see incoming requests "live", I mean when I run the app like python run.py.



Now after starting the service I'd like to follow logs of the app and I do:



sudo journalctl -f -u my_app.service


and incoming logs are awfully slow - sometimes it takes minutes or more for them to appear in logs. Afterwards they all have proper timestamp though, so it's not like they're disappearing, they do, but after a long time.



What I've tried:





  • to redirect systemd service output to files:



    StandardOutput=file:/var/log/my_app/output.log



    StandardError=file:/var/log/my_app/error.log



    with no luck - they save fine but with the same slow speed



  • to try to dump journalctl logs to offline faster setting SyncIntervalSec from default 5m to 5s - didn't help either



Is there any way to pass those logs faster from my application to journald? I don't have troubles with other services like system authentication ones - I see records immediately.
My journald.conf file has default parameters (except one above), my systemd is version 237 and I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.







systemd logs systemd-journald journalctl






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 8 at 14:39









adamcziadamczi

1315 bronze badges




1315 bronze badges








  • 1





    Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 16:11






  • 1





    Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

    – JdeBP
    Mar 8 at 16:58













  • Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

    – adamczi
    Mar 8 at 17:28











  • @adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 17:39














  • 1





    Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 16:11






  • 1





    Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

    – JdeBP
    Mar 8 at 16:58













  • Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

    – adamczi
    Mar 8 at 17:28











  • @adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

    – filbranden
    Mar 8 at 17:39








1




1





Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

– filbranden
Mar 8 at 16:11





Can you check if .../python3 -u /home/myuser/myapp/run.py will fix this? It looks like Python stdout buffering is what's preventing your log lines from being flushed right away... Buffering is typically turned off when writing to the terminal (so when you run it manually), but needs an option when writing to file or pipe.

– filbranden
Mar 8 at 16:11




1




1





Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

– JdeBP
Mar 8 at 16:58







Oh look! It's the python buffering question again. See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285419 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68059 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/206224 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164987 .

– JdeBP
Mar 8 at 16:58















Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

– adamczi
Mar 8 at 17:28





Thank you very much, sorry for repeated question - I spend lots of time searching but seems that I used wrong keywords. @filbranden if you post your comment as an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.

– adamczi
Mar 8 at 17:28













@adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

– filbranden
Mar 8 at 17:39





@adamczi Totally understandable. It's hard to think that the system producing the logs is the one at fault, especially when it works fine when you run it on a terminal... Once you've been using Unix/Linux for 20+ years, that becomes "obvious" to you, but I definitely agree that's counter intuitive for a beginner. I'll go ahead and post my comment as an answer. Thanks for confirming the -u setting worked for you!

– filbranden
Mar 8 at 17:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The problem is actually with buffering from the Flask application and not with how systemd or journald are ingesting those logs.



This can be counter-intuitive, since as you mentioned, running python3 run.py directly on the command-line works and shows logs properly and also timestamps look correct on the logs.



The former happens because Unix/Linux will typically set up stdout to be unbuffered when connected to a terminal (since it's expecting interaction with an user), and unbuffered when connected to a file (in case of StandardOutput=file:...) or to a pipe (in case you're logging to the journal, which is the default.)



The latter is because the Python/Flask logger is adding timestamps, so even though it's buffering that output, when it finally issues it into the logs, all the timestamps are there.



Some applications will know this is typically an issue and will set up buffering on stdout appropriately when using it for logs, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this particular Python/Flask setup you are using.



On Python, it's fairly easy to globally change stdout to unbuffered mode, which you can do by:




  1. Passing a -u flag to python3 in your command.

  2. Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in your environment (which you can do in the systemd service unit with an additional Environment=PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 line.)


You confirmed this worked for your specific case, so that's great!



For non-Python applications suffering from similar issues, there are command-line tools such as unbuffer and stdbuf which can often solve this same problem.



Solutions are usually specific to the kind of application, which is somewhat unfortunate, but often googling or looking for other answers in Stack Exchange (once you know buffering is the issue) will usually lead you to an useful suggestion.






share|improve this answer































    0














    It seems you have mistyped. You say "A is unbuffered, but B is unbuffered". I suspect the second one should be 'buffered'.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505146%2fgetting-systemd-service-logs-faster-from-my-service%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      The problem is actually with buffering from the Flask application and not with how systemd or journald are ingesting those logs.



      This can be counter-intuitive, since as you mentioned, running python3 run.py directly on the command-line works and shows logs properly and also timestamps look correct on the logs.



      The former happens because Unix/Linux will typically set up stdout to be unbuffered when connected to a terminal (since it's expecting interaction with an user), and unbuffered when connected to a file (in case of StandardOutput=file:...) or to a pipe (in case you're logging to the journal, which is the default.)



      The latter is because the Python/Flask logger is adding timestamps, so even though it's buffering that output, when it finally issues it into the logs, all the timestamps are there.



      Some applications will know this is typically an issue and will set up buffering on stdout appropriately when using it for logs, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this particular Python/Flask setup you are using.



      On Python, it's fairly easy to globally change stdout to unbuffered mode, which you can do by:




      1. Passing a -u flag to python3 in your command.

      2. Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in your environment (which you can do in the systemd service unit with an additional Environment=PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 line.)


      You confirmed this worked for your specific case, so that's great!



      For non-Python applications suffering from similar issues, there are command-line tools such as unbuffer and stdbuf which can often solve this same problem.



      Solutions are usually specific to the kind of application, which is somewhat unfortunate, but often googling or looking for other answers in Stack Exchange (once you know buffering is the issue) will usually lead you to an useful suggestion.






      share|improve this answer




























        2














        The problem is actually with buffering from the Flask application and not with how systemd or journald are ingesting those logs.



        This can be counter-intuitive, since as you mentioned, running python3 run.py directly on the command-line works and shows logs properly and also timestamps look correct on the logs.



        The former happens because Unix/Linux will typically set up stdout to be unbuffered when connected to a terminal (since it's expecting interaction with an user), and unbuffered when connected to a file (in case of StandardOutput=file:...) or to a pipe (in case you're logging to the journal, which is the default.)



        The latter is because the Python/Flask logger is adding timestamps, so even though it's buffering that output, when it finally issues it into the logs, all the timestamps are there.



        Some applications will know this is typically an issue and will set up buffering on stdout appropriately when using it for logs, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this particular Python/Flask setup you are using.



        On Python, it's fairly easy to globally change stdout to unbuffered mode, which you can do by:




        1. Passing a -u flag to python3 in your command.

        2. Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in your environment (which you can do in the systemd service unit with an additional Environment=PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 line.)


        You confirmed this worked for your specific case, so that's great!



        For non-Python applications suffering from similar issues, there are command-line tools such as unbuffer and stdbuf which can often solve this same problem.



        Solutions are usually specific to the kind of application, which is somewhat unfortunate, but often googling or looking for other answers in Stack Exchange (once you know buffering is the issue) will usually lead you to an useful suggestion.






        share|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2







          The problem is actually with buffering from the Flask application and not with how systemd or journald are ingesting those logs.



          This can be counter-intuitive, since as you mentioned, running python3 run.py directly on the command-line works and shows logs properly and also timestamps look correct on the logs.



          The former happens because Unix/Linux will typically set up stdout to be unbuffered when connected to a terminal (since it's expecting interaction with an user), and unbuffered when connected to a file (in case of StandardOutput=file:...) or to a pipe (in case you're logging to the journal, which is the default.)



          The latter is because the Python/Flask logger is adding timestamps, so even though it's buffering that output, when it finally issues it into the logs, all the timestamps are there.



          Some applications will know this is typically an issue and will set up buffering on stdout appropriately when using it for logs, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this particular Python/Flask setup you are using.



          On Python, it's fairly easy to globally change stdout to unbuffered mode, which you can do by:




          1. Passing a -u flag to python3 in your command.

          2. Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in your environment (which you can do in the systemd service unit with an additional Environment=PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 line.)


          You confirmed this worked for your specific case, so that's great!



          For non-Python applications suffering from similar issues, there are command-line tools such as unbuffer and stdbuf which can often solve this same problem.



          Solutions are usually specific to the kind of application, which is somewhat unfortunate, but often googling or looking for other answers in Stack Exchange (once you know buffering is the issue) will usually lead you to an useful suggestion.






          share|improve this answer













          The problem is actually with buffering from the Flask application and not with how systemd or journald are ingesting those logs.



          This can be counter-intuitive, since as you mentioned, running python3 run.py directly on the command-line works and shows logs properly and also timestamps look correct on the logs.



          The former happens because Unix/Linux will typically set up stdout to be unbuffered when connected to a terminal (since it's expecting interaction with an user), and unbuffered when connected to a file (in case of StandardOutput=file:...) or to a pipe (in case you're logging to the journal, which is the default.)



          The latter is because the Python/Flask logger is adding timestamps, so even though it's buffering that output, when it finally issues it into the logs, all the timestamps are there.



          Some applications will know this is typically an issue and will set up buffering on stdout appropriately when using it for logs, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this particular Python/Flask setup you are using.



          On Python, it's fairly easy to globally change stdout to unbuffered mode, which you can do by:




          1. Passing a -u flag to python3 in your command.

          2. Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 in your environment (which you can do in the systemd service unit with an additional Environment=PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 line.)


          You confirmed this worked for your specific case, so that's great!



          For non-Python applications suffering from similar issues, there are command-line tools such as unbuffer and stdbuf which can often solve this same problem.



          Solutions are usually specific to the kind of application, which is somewhat unfortunate, but often googling or looking for other answers in Stack Exchange (once you know buffering is the issue) will usually lead you to an useful suggestion.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 8 at 17:53









          filbrandenfilbranden

          12.1k2 gold badges22 silver badges52 bronze badges




          12.1k2 gold badges22 silver badges52 bronze badges

























              0














              It seems you have mistyped. You say "A is unbuffered, but B is unbuffered". I suspect the second one should be 'buffered'.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor



              Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                0














                It seems you have mistyped. You say "A is unbuffered, but B is unbuffered". I suspect the second one should be 'buffered'.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  0












                  0








                  0







                  It seems you have mistyped. You say "A is unbuffered, but B is unbuffered". I suspect the second one should be 'buffered'.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  It seems you have mistyped. You say "A is unbuffered, but B is unbuffered". I suspect the second one should be 'buffered'.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 19 mins ago









                  Khan ShusnisKhan Shusnis

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor



                  Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Khan Shusnis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.
































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505146%2fgetting-systemd-service-logs-faster-from-my-service%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                      Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                      Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...