Why do they not say “The Baby”Why use “the” for oceans/seas/rivers etc. but not lakes?Why is there no...

What is this welding tool I found in my attic?

Is this floating-point optimization allowed?

Professor falsely accusing me of cheating in a class he does not teach, two months after end of the class. What precautions should I take?

Help with understanding nuances of extremely popular Kyoto-ben (?) tweet

Cubic programming and beyond?

Why limit to revolvers?

Where is my understanding of TikZ styles wrong?

How do Windows version numbers work?

Why would guns not work in the dungeon?

Can I call 112 to check a police officer's identity in the Czech Republic?

Did any of the founding fathers anticipate Lysander Spooner's criticism of the constitution?

Does Google Maps take into account hills/inclines for route times?

Can a continent naturally split into two distant parts within a week?

Interpreting the word "randomly"

How can I legally visit the United States Minor Outlying Islands in the Pacific?

A DVR algebra with weird automorphisms

When is pointing out a person's hypocrisy not considered to be a logical fallacy?

Why hasn't the U.S. government paid war reparations to any country it attacked?

download the bitcoin chain begining from a certain date

How to check the quality of an audio sample?

Should you avoid redundant information after dialogue?

Why does the autopilot disengage even when it does not receive pilot input?

Why did my rum cake turn black?

P-MOSFET failing



Why do they not say “The Baby”


Why use “the” for oceans/seas/rivers etc. but not lakes?Why is there no article in “The Child is father of the man”?Why isn’t the definite article used in “The commission commanded that work […] should cease”?Why no “the” or “a” here?Which is right and why: Why do people go (to zoos/to zoo/to the zoo)?Why the zero article in “in daily life” and “became pointless talking”?“I saw Sue in town yesterday, but she didn't see me.” Why is there no article before “town”?Why is it “time of day” but “hour of the day”?Why is the article omitted before “climate change”?Why isn't there any article in the expression “vary from school to school”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkXnhlCkVPM



In this video he says "put baby in" and not "put the baby in"
Also, in other baby type videos they say "place baby inside" or "now you can see that baby and mom are happy"



There is no "the baby" or "the baby's mom" or "the mom".



The video is one example of many. I asked someone who said it is something to do with the agenda of keeping people happy and not offended by mentioning a gender. I don't think this is true though.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

    – Jason Bassford
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

    – Jim
    7 hours ago











  • Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

    – barbecue
    52 mins ago













  • English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

    – Blorgbeard
    23 mins ago


















5















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkXnhlCkVPM



In this video he says "put baby in" and not "put the baby in"
Also, in other baby type videos they say "place baby inside" or "now you can see that baby and mom are happy"



There is no "the baby" or "the baby's mom" or "the mom".



The video is one example of many. I asked someone who said it is something to do with the agenda of keeping people happy and not offended by mentioning a gender. I don't think this is true though.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

    – Jason Bassford
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

    – Jim
    7 hours ago











  • Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

    – barbecue
    52 mins ago













  • English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

    – Blorgbeard
    23 mins ago














5












5








5








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkXnhlCkVPM



In this video he says "put baby in" and not "put the baby in"
Also, in other baby type videos they say "place baby inside" or "now you can see that baby and mom are happy"



There is no "the baby" or "the baby's mom" or "the mom".



The video is one example of many. I asked someone who said it is something to do with the agenda of keeping people happy and not offended by mentioning a gender. I don't think this is true though.










share|improve this question
















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkXnhlCkVPM



In this video he says "put baby in" and not "put the baby in"
Also, in other baby type videos they say "place baby inside" or "now you can see that baby and mom are happy"



There is no "the baby" or "the baby's mom" or "the mom".



The video is one example of many. I asked someone who said it is something to do with the agenda of keeping people happy and not offended by mentioning a gender. I don't think this is true though.







zero-article






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Matt E. Эллен

25.7k14 gold badges90 silver badges153 bronze badges




25.7k14 gold badges90 silver badges153 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









TheBlackBenzKidTheBlackBenzKid

1336 bronze badges




1336 bronze badges








  • 1





    People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

    – Jason Bassford
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

    – Jim
    7 hours ago











  • Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

    – barbecue
    52 mins ago













  • English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

    – Blorgbeard
    23 mins ago














  • 1





    People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

    – Jason Bassford
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

    – Jim
    7 hours ago











  • Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

    – barbecue
    52 mins ago













  • English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

    – Blorgbeard
    23 mins ago








1




1





People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

– Jason Bassford
9 hours ago





People frequently don't speak in a way that would be considered grammatical if the same words were used in writing.

– Jason Bassford
9 hours ago




1




1





they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

– Jim
7 hours ago





they aren’t saying “put baby in” they’re saying, “put Baby in.” :-)

– Jim
7 hours ago













Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

– barbecue
52 mins ago







Just pointing out that this kind of usage is much more common in British English than American. It's got nothing to do with gender politics, this has been very common usage in British English for decades if not longer.

– barbecue
52 mins ago















English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

– Blorgbeard
23 mins ago





English articles don't have gender - how would "the baby" indicate a gender? Which one would it indicate?

– Blorgbeard
23 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














'Baby' and 'Mom' are being used as substitutes for names, just as you might say to a small child 'Where's Mommy?' rather than 'Where is your mother?'






share|improve this answer































    3














    Saying just 'baby' or just 'mom' is using those words as names.



    Using 'the' in front of the other person is like using the third person for yourself. Without 'the' it's like you're using their first name as though it is 'Baby'. It sounds weird and is probably weirder sounding than using 'the', because 'baby' is a weird name for someone). But it is the way to refer to babies in these situations.



    I don't think it is transferable to other situations. For example, you don't usually say 'Boxer then plants his fist in Opponent's jawbone'






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

      – Cascabel
      4 hours ago











    • @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

      – Mitch
      4 hours ago













    • I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

      – Cascabel
      4 hours ago













    • This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

      – barbecue
      49 mins ago
















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504942%2fwhy-do-they-not-say-the-baby%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    'Baby' and 'Mom' are being used as substitutes for names, just as you might say to a small child 'Where's Mommy?' rather than 'Where is your mother?'






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      'Baby' and 'Mom' are being used as substitutes for names, just as you might say to a small child 'Where's Mommy?' rather than 'Where is your mother?'






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        'Baby' and 'Mom' are being used as substitutes for names, just as you might say to a small child 'Where's Mommy?' rather than 'Where is your mother?'






        share|improve this answer













        'Baby' and 'Mom' are being used as substitutes for names, just as you might say to a small child 'Where's Mommy?' rather than 'Where is your mother?'







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        Kate BuntingKate Bunting

        7,2963 gold badges15 silver badges19 bronze badges




        7,2963 gold badges15 silver badges19 bronze badges

























            3














            Saying just 'baby' or just 'mom' is using those words as names.



            Using 'the' in front of the other person is like using the third person for yourself. Without 'the' it's like you're using their first name as though it is 'Baby'. It sounds weird and is probably weirder sounding than using 'the', because 'baby' is a weird name for someone). But it is the way to refer to babies in these situations.



            I don't think it is transferable to other situations. For example, you don't usually say 'Boxer then plants his fist in Opponent's jawbone'






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago











            • @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

              – Mitch
              4 hours ago













            • I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago













            • This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

              – barbecue
              49 mins ago


















            3














            Saying just 'baby' or just 'mom' is using those words as names.



            Using 'the' in front of the other person is like using the third person for yourself. Without 'the' it's like you're using their first name as though it is 'Baby'. It sounds weird and is probably weirder sounding than using 'the', because 'baby' is a weird name for someone). But it is the way to refer to babies in these situations.



            I don't think it is transferable to other situations. For example, you don't usually say 'Boxer then plants his fist in Opponent's jawbone'






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago











            • @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

              – Mitch
              4 hours ago













            • I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago













            • This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

              – barbecue
              49 mins ago
















            3












            3








            3







            Saying just 'baby' or just 'mom' is using those words as names.



            Using 'the' in front of the other person is like using the third person for yourself. Without 'the' it's like you're using their first name as though it is 'Baby'. It sounds weird and is probably weirder sounding than using 'the', because 'baby' is a weird name for someone). But it is the way to refer to babies in these situations.



            I don't think it is transferable to other situations. For example, you don't usually say 'Boxer then plants his fist in Opponent's jawbone'






            share|improve this answer















            Saying just 'baby' or just 'mom' is using those words as names.



            Using 'the' in front of the other person is like using the third person for yourself. Without 'the' it's like you're using their first name as though it is 'Baby'. It sounds weird and is probably weirder sounding than using 'the', because 'baby' is a weird name for someone). But it is the way to refer to babies in these situations.



            I don't think it is transferable to other situations. For example, you don't usually say 'Boxer then plants his fist in Opponent's jawbone'







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            MitchMitch

            53.6k16 gold badges108 silver badges225 bronze badges




            53.6k16 gold badges108 silver badges225 bronze badges








            • 1





              My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago











            • @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

              – Mitch
              4 hours ago













            • I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago













            • This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

              – barbecue
              49 mins ago
















            • 1





              My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago











            • @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

              – Mitch
              4 hours ago













            • I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

              – Cascabel
              4 hours ago













            • This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

              – barbecue
              49 mins ago










            1




            1





            My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

            – Cascabel
            4 hours ago





            My 16 year-old is called "Baby" in the family as she is the youngest, just as her mother is called "Baby" by her mother still, even though she is past 50...so I don't think it sounds weird. Also, do you remember "Dirty Dancing"?

            – Cascabel
            4 hours ago













            @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

            – Mitch
            4 hours ago







            @Cascabel Yes, of course. But in the specific context of the OP, it is definitely strange sounding.

            – Mitch
            4 hours ago















            I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

            – Cascabel
            4 hours ago







            I guess it depends on the relationship of the speaker to the little tike.;) I have to confess I was to lazy to go off-page and listen the the sound bite.

            – Cascabel
            4 hours ago















            This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

            – barbecue
            49 mins ago







            This wording provides a way to personalize the infant without having to know a name. It's a way of taking specific instructions like you would give to a person you know, and generalizing them for a larger audience, while still retaining a sense of individuality. Each audience member can substitute their own baby everywhere the narrator says "Baby." It's also friendlier and less detached, which is good in promotional materials.

            – barbecue
            49 mins ago




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504942%2fwhy-do-they-not-say-the-baby%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Ciclooctatetraenă Vezi și | Bibliografie | Meniu de navigare637866text4148569-500570979m