How to decide whether an eshop is safe or compromisedWhat does this Https - “not fully secure” warning...

Three Singles in Three Clubs

Can I switch to third-person while not in 'town' in Destiny 2?

Would it be possible to have a GMO that produces chocolate?

Fried gnocchi with spinach, bacon, cream sauce in a single pan

Do ability scores have any effect on casting Wish spell

What brought these couples together?

Is there a limit on how long the casting (speaking aloud part of the spell) of Wish can be?

Are required indicators necessary for radio buttons?

Is a butterfly one or two animals?

Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?

Is there a known non-euclidean geometry where two concentric circles of different radii can intersect? (as in the novel "The Universe Between")

Why is Boris Johnson visiting only Paris & Berlin if every member of the EU needs to agree on a withdrawal deal?

What to say to a student who has failed?

Is there any practical application for performing a double Fourier transform? ...or an inverse Fourier transform on a time-domain input?

Can you help me understand Modes from the aspect of chord changes?

What’s the difference between something that approaches infinity and something that is infinite.

What professions would a medieval village with a population of 100 need?

Vacuum collapse -- why do strong metals implode but glass doesn't?

Why can't an Airbus A330 dump fuel in an emergency?

Factoring the square of this polynomial?

How to write triplets in 4/4 time without using a 3 on top of the notes all the time

How much code would a codegolf golf if a codegolf could golf code?

Do AT motherboards (286, 386, 486) really need -5V (besides redirecting it to ISA connectors)?

Why is observed clock rate < 3MHz on Arduino Uno?



How to decide whether an eshop is safe or compromised


What does this Https - “not fully secure” warning mean?How can I protect my browser from being compromised?HeartBleed - How to detect compromised websitesCan HTTPS be compromised by first contact?How safe is SSL on an untrusted computer and network?Decide to REST API SecurityHow safe is WebCryptoAPI these days?How safe is TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







12















So, I am having this issue where I want to buy a specific wacom product but their online store eu-store.wacom.com and us-store.wacom.com, even though it is being accessed through https, does not convince my firefox that it's safe.



Firefox reporting that the connection is not secure



The actual wacom homepage www.wacom.com shows up with a proper green lock and is verified by godaddy. Their eshop is under the same wacom.com domain but the godaddy verification is missing.



My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening, how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's, and ultimately, is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • 23





    Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

    – user
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

    – user1
    yesterday











  • As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

    – Wildcard
    yesterday


















12















So, I am having this issue where I want to buy a specific wacom product but their online store eu-store.wacom.com and us-store.wacom.com, even though it is being accessed through https, does not convince my firefox that it's safe.



Firefox reporting that the connection is not secure



The actual wacom homepage www.wacom.com shows up with a proper green lock and is verified by godaddy. Their eshop is under the same wacom.com domain but the godaddy verification is missing.



My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening, how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's, and ultimately, is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • 23





    Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

    – user
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

    – user1
    yesterday











  • As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

    – Wildcard
    yesterday














12












12








12


1






So, I am having this issue where I want to buy a specific wacom product but their online store eu-store.wacom.com and us-store.wacom.com, even though it is being accessed through https, does not convince my firefox that it's safe.



Firefox reporting that the connection is not secure



The actual wacom homepage www.wacom.com shows up with a proper green lock and is verified by godaddy. Their eshop is under the same wacom.com domain but the godaddy verification is missing.



My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening, how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's, and ultimately, is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So, I am having this issue where I want to buy a specific wacom product but their online store eu-store.wacom.com and us-store.wacom.com, even though it is being accessed through https, does not convince my firefox that it's safe.



Firefox reporting that the connection is not secure



The actual wacom homepage www.wacom.com shows up with a proper green lock and is verified by godaddy. Their eshop is under the same wacom.com domain but the godaddy verification is missing.



My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening, how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's, and ultimately, is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?







tls web-browser






share|improve this question









New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Eternal_Light













New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 2 days ago









Eternal_LightEternal_Light

1661 silver badge6 bronze badges




1661 silver badge6 bronze badges




New contributor



Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Eternal_Light is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • 23





    Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

    – user
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

    – user1
    yesterday











  • As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

    – Wildcard
    yesterday














  • 23





    Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

    – user
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

    – user1
    yesterday











  • As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

    – Wildcard
    yesterday








23




23





Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

– user
2 days ago





Just an FYI, if a site was compromised and modified (not redirected to another malicious site), it will still show a green "secure" icon since those certificate checks only verify the certificate and URL.

– user
2 days ago




1




1





Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

– user1
yesterday





Similar issue to security.stackexchange.com/questions/147928/… but a different warning as its a different web browser. But fundamentally the same issue

– user1
yesterday













As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

– Wildcard
yesterday





As an additional safeguard, many credit cards and banks now offer virtual account numbers, sometimes called “ShopSafe” or similar. You log into your account online and generate a disposable credit card number to use for a single purchase or a single recurring purchase, for a specified amount. If the number is later compromised it won’t matter.

– Wildcard
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















15













On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https. This can be solved by installing HTTPS Everywhere and turning on "Encrypt All Sites Eligible":



enter image description here



The gray padlock means all resources are served securely. So the webstore is most likely not compromised. They are still using an outdated cipher based on CBC and SHA1, so a nation-state power might still be able to intercept or even MITM the connection.






share|improve this answer




























  • HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago













  • @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

    – AndrolGenhald
    2 days ago






  • 1





    You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago






  • 1





    If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago





















8














My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening




This is known as mixed-content,where the page is loaded with HTTPS,while some parts(images) are loaded via Insecure HTTP.




how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's




As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way is to use HTTPS everywhere and visit the correct URL or else the HTTP can be MITM and the response returned could itself be a phishing page.




NOTE:-This answer ignores all the other web/browser vulnerabilities.




is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?




Well they probably redirect you to a different website when its time to pay which might use HTTPS.Apart from that images can be tampered with in a MITM situation.The most an attacker can do is




Attackers may be able to manipulate parts of the page, for example, by
displaying misleading or inappropriate content, but they should not be
able to steal your personal data from the site.







share|improve this answer




























  • This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago













  • Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago











  • @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

    – Vipul Nair
    2 days ago



















5














On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https




Let me continue from that. Firefox says it's not 100% secure because it's loading unprotected content. I would say, naively... it's 95% secure



Now, it doesn't mean the site wacom.com is not legitimate, but perhaps misconfigured. If you buy today from that site, it's not likely that you are paying a scammer pretending to be Wacom, but see later.



On the contrary, unprotected content served over http can be a danger to Wacom themselves who did not configure their store correctly.



Apart from what government-level attackers can do, here are some examples of what a real attacker can do on a MitM attack over plain old http:




  • Images served over http may display something else than the product you are going to buy

  • Javascript (and possibly CSS) served over http can be altered and cause any possible harm, including sniffing your credit card number


  • Iframes served over http can be altered and cause a number of damages, but probably not sniff your CC number (correct me if I am wrong)


Of course I am speaking from a more protocol-theoretical PoV.



So...




how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's?




Yes, they are them. The site is not compromised, but vulnerable




is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it




Probably from your home network. I would always avoid sensitive browsing over public wifis or Tor without proper encryption






share|improve this answer






























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "162"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Eternal_Light is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215566%2fhow-to-decide-whether-an-eshop-is-safe-or-compromised%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15













    On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https. This can be solved by installing HTTPS Everywhere and turning on "Encrypt All Sites Eligible":



    enter image description here



    The gray padlock means all resources are served securely. So the webstore is most likely not compromised. They are still using an outdated cipher based on CBC and SHA1, so a nation-state power might still be able to intercept or even MITM the connection.






    share|improve this answer




























    • HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago













    • @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago






    • 5





      @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

      – AndrolGenhald
      2 days ago






    • 1





      You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago






    • 1





      If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago


















    15













    On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https. This can be solved by installing HTTPS Everywhere and turning on "Encrypt All Sites Eligible":



    enter image description here



    The gray padlock means all resources are served securely. So the webstore is most likely not compromised. They are still using an outdated cipher based on CBC and SHA1, so a nation-state power might still be able to intercept or even MITM the connection.






    share|improve this answer




























    • HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago













    • @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago






    • 5





      @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

      – AndrolGenhald
      2 days ago






    • 1





      You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago






    • 1





      If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago
















    15












    15








    15







    On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https. This can be solved by installing HTTPS Everywhere and turning on "Encrypt All Sites Eligible":



    enter image description here



    The gray padlock means all resources are served securely. So the webstore is most likely not compromised. They are still using an outdated cipher based on CBC and SHA1, so a nation-state power might still be able to intercept or even MITM the connection.






    share|improve this answer















    On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https. This can be solved by installing HTTPS Everywhere and turning on "Encrypt All Sites Eligible":



    enter image description here



    The gray padlock means all resources are served securely. So the webstore is most likely not compromised. They are still using an outdated cipher based on CBC and SHA1, so a nation-state power might still be able to intercept or even MITM the connection.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    JenessaJenessa

    6543 silver badges11 bronze badges




    6543 silver badges11 bronze badges
















    • HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago













    • @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago






    • 5





      @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

      – AndrolGenhald
      2 days ago






    • 1





      You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago






    • 1





      If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago





















    • HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago













    • @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago






    • 5





      @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

      – AndrolGenhald
      2 days ago






    • 1





      You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

      – A. Hersean
      2 days ago






    • 1





      If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago



















    HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago







    HTTPS Everywhere uses a whitelist approach, which is inherently flawed. I would instead recommend "Smart HTTPS" or any other addon that enforce HTTPS really everywhere (then fallback on HTTP on issues).

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago















    @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago





    @A.Hersean I don't know about the Firefox version, but the chrome version only seems to work for url-bar urls, not image loads or fetch requests. That kind of defeats the point :(

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago




    5




    5





    @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

    – AndrolGenhald
    2 days ago





    @A.Hersean HTTPS Everywhere does have a "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" mode that requires an explicit confirmation before allowing unencrypted requests, but it is off by default so it should probably be mentioned in the answer.

    – AndrolGenhald
    2 days ago




    1




    1





    You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago





    You're right Smart HTTPS does not block image loads over HTTP, but I have another extension that blocks them, so I didn't mind. I tried "Encrypt All Sites Eligible" in the drop down menu of the addon: it's a new feature I didn't know, and it appears to work as intended. I agree with @AndrolGenhald : it should be mentioned in the answer.

    – A. Hersean
    2 days ago




    1




    1





    If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago







    If this scenario occurs, all active and active mixed content will be blocked. The only passive content allowed via http will be (from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Mixed_content): <img>, <audio> and <video> src tags, and <object> subresources. So no stylesheets or fetch requests etc. will be allowed via http

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago















    8














    My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening




    This is known as mixed-content,where the page is loaded with HTTPS,while some parts(images) are loaded via Insecure HTTP.




    how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's




    As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way is to use HTTPS everywhere and visit the correct URL or else the HTTP can be MITM and the response returned could itself be a phishing page.




    NOTE:-This answer ignores all the other web/browser vulnerabilities.




    is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?




    Well they probably redirect you to a different website when its time to pay which might use HTTPS.Apart from that images can be tampered with in a MITM situation.The most an attacker can do is




    Attackers may be able to manipulate parts of the page, for example, by
    displaying misleading or inappropriate content, but they should not be
    able to steal your personal data from the site.







    share|improve this answer




























    • This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago













    • Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago











    • @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

      – Vipul Nair
      2 days ago
















    8














    My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening




    This is known as mixed-content,where the page is loaded with HTTPS,while some parts(images) are loaded via Insecure HTTP.




    how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's




    As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way is to use HTTPS everywhere and visit the correct URL or else the HTTP can be MITM and the response returned could itself be a phishing page.




    NOTE:-This answer ignores all the other web/browser vulnerabilities.




    is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?




    Well they probably redirect you to a different website when its time to pay which might use HTTPS.Apart from that images can be tampered with in a MITM situation.The most an attacker can do is




    Attackers may be able to manipulate parts of the page, for example, by
    displaying misleading or inappropriate content, but they should not be
    able to steal your personal data from the site.







    share|improve this answer




























    • This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago













    • Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago











    • @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

      – Vipul Nair
      2 days ago














    8












    8








    8








    My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening




    This is known as mixed-content,where the page is loaded with HTTPS,while some parts(images) are loaded via Insecure HTTP.




    how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's




    As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way is to use HTTPS everywhere and visit the correct URL or else the HTTP can be MITM and the response returned could itself be a phishing page.




    NOTE:-This answer ignores all the other web/browser vulnerabilities.




    is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?




    Well they probably redirect you to a different website when its time to pay which might use HTTPS.Apart from that images can be tampered with in a MITM situation.The most an attacker can do is




    Attackers may be able to manipulate parts of the page, for example, by
    displaying misleading or inappropriate content, but they should not be
    able to steal your personal data from the site.







    share|improve this answer
















    My questions are, why is this inconsistency happening




    This is known as mixed-content,where the page is loaded with HTTPS,while some parts(images) are loaded via Insecure HTTP.




    how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's




    As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way is to use HTTPS everywhere and visit the correct URL or else the HTTP can be MITM and the response returned could itself be a phishing page.




    NOTE:-This answer ignores all the other web/browser vulnerabilities.




    is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it?




    Well they probably redirect you to a different website when its time to pay which might use HTTPS.Apart from that images can be tampered with in a MITM situation.The most an attacker can do is




    Attackers may be able to manipulate parts of the page, for example, by
    displaying misleading or inappropriate content, but they should not be
    able to steal your personal data from the site.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    Vipul NairVipul Nair

    2,0871 gold badge6 silver badges23 bronze badges




    2,0871 gold badge6 silver badges23 bronze badges
















    • This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago













    • Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago











    • @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

      – Vipul Nair
      2 days ago



















    • This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago













    • Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

      – Jenessa
      2 days ago











    • @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

      – Vipul Nair
      2 days ago

















    This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago







    This answer has some problems, for example "As long as your system has not been compromised then the only way to know is to visit the correct URL.For ex you know google is at www.google.com" is not true if Google doesn't use HSTS Preloading and you're visiting for the first time

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago















    Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago





    Phishing usually have different urls. But if eu-store.wacom.com was being MITM'd (due to disfunctional https), it could be a phising site while still having a legitimate url right? So just checking the url is not enough

    – Jenessa
    2 days ago













    @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

    – Vipul Nair
    2 days ago





    @Jenessa i understood your point and edited.

    – Vipul Nair
    2 days ago











    5














    On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https




    Let me continue from that. Firefox says it's not 100% secure because it's loading unprotected content. I would say, naively... it's 95% secure



    Now, it doesn't mean the site wacom.com is not legitimate, but perhaps misconfigured. If you buy today from that site, it's not likely that you are paying a scammer pretending to be Wacom, but see later.



    On the contrary, unprotected content served over http can be a danger to Wacom themselves who did not configure their store correctly.



    Apart from what government-level attackers can do, here are some examples of what a real attacker can do on a MitM attack over plain old http:




    • Images served over http may display something else than the product you are going to buy

    • Javascript (and possibly CSS) served over http can be altered and cause any possible harm, including sniffing your credit card number


    • Iframes served over http can be altered and cause a number of damages, but probably not sniff your CC number (correct me if I am wrong)


    Of course I am speaking from a more protocol-theoretical PoV.



    So...




    how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's?




    Yes, they are them. The site is not compromised, but vulnerable




    is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it




    Probably from your home network. I would always avoid sensitive browsing over public wifis or Tor without proper encryption






    share|improve this answer
































      5














      On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https




      Let me continue from that. Firefox says it's not 100% secure because it's loading unprotected content. I would say, naively... it's 95% secure



      Now, it doesn't mean the site wacom.com is not legitimate, but perhaps misconfigured. If you buy today from that site, it's not likely that you are paying a scammer pretending to be Wacom, but see later.



      On the contrary, unprotected content served over http can be a danger to Wacom themselves who did not configure their store correctly.



      Apart from what government-level attackers can do, here are some examples of what a real attacker can do on a MitM attack over plain old http:




      • Images served over http may display something else than the product you are going to buy

      • Javascript (and possibly CSS) served over http can be altered and cause any possible harm, including sniffing your credit card number


      • Iframes served over http can be altered and cause a number of damages, but probably not sniff your CC number (correct me if I am wrong)


      Of course I am speaking from a more protocol-theoretical PoV.



      So...




      how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's?




      Yes, they are them. The site is not compromised, but vulnerable




      is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it




      Probably from your home network. I would always avoid sensitive browsing over public wifis or Tor without proper encryption






      share|improve this answer






























        5












        5








        5








        On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https




        Let me continue from that. Firefox says it's not 100% secure because it's loading unprotected content. I would say, naively... it's 95% secure



        Now, it doesn't mean the site wacom.com is not legitimate, but perhaps misconfigured. If you buy today from that site, it's not likely that you are paying a scammer pretending to be Wacom, but see later.



        On the contrary, unprotected content served over http can be a danger to Wacom themselves who did not configure their store correctly.



        Apart from what government-level attackers can do, here are some examples of what a real attacker can do on a MitM attack over plain old http:




        • Images served over http may display something else than the product you are going to buy

        • Javascript (and possibly CSS) served over http can be altered and cause any possible harm, including sniffing your credit card number


        • Iframes served over http can be altered and cause a number of damages, but probably not sniff your CC number (correct me if I am wrong)


        Of course I am speaking from a more protocol-theoretical PoV.



        So...




        how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's?




        Yes, they are them. The site is not compromised, but vulnerable




        is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it




        Probably from your home network. I would always avoid sensitive browsing over public wifis or Tor without proper encryption






        share|improve this answer
















        On eu-store.wacom.com, some images from their Amazon CDN are requested over http instead of https




        Let me continue from that. Firefox says it's not 100% secure because it's loading unprotected content. I would say, naively... it's 95% secure



        Now, it doesn't mean the site wacom.com is not legitimate, but perhaps misconfigured. If you buy today from that site, it's not likely that you are paying a scammer pretending to be Wacom, but see later.



        On the contrary, unprotected content served over http can be a danger to Wacom themselves who did not configure their store correctly.



        Apart from what government-level attackers can do, here are some examples of what a real attacker can do on a MitM attack over plain old http:




        • Images served over http may display something else than the product you are going to buy

        • Javascript (and possibly CSS) served over http can be altered and cause any possible harm, including sniffing your credit card number


        • Iframes served over http can be altered and cause a number of damages, but probably not sniff your CC number (correct me if I am wrong)


        Of course I am speaking from a more protocol-theoretical PoV.



        So...




        how can I verify that the store page is indeed wacom's?




        Yes, they are them. The site is not compromised, but vulnerable




        is it safe for me to purchase stuff with my card through it




        Probably from your home network. I would always avoid sensitive browsing over public wifis or Tor without proper encryption







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered 2 days ago









        usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝusr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ

        2,2091 gold badge9 silver badges22 bronze badges




        2,2091 gold badge9 silver badges22 bronze badges

























            Eternal_Light is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Eternal_Light is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Eternal_Light is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Eternal_Light is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215566%2fhow-to-decide-whether-an-eshop-is-safe-or-compromised%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...