Is it allowable to use an organization's name to publish a paper in a conference, even after I graduate from...

Efficiently pathfinding many flocking enemies around obstacles

Ask for a paid taxi in order to arrive as early as possible for an interview within the city

What is the hex versus octal timeline?

Why didn’t Doctor Strange stay in the original winning timeline?

How to refer to a regex group in awk regex?

How would one country purchase another?

Are required indicators necessary for radio buttons?

Can my boyfriend, who lives in the UK and has a Polish passport, visit me in the USA?

Factoring the square of this polynomial?

How can I watch the 17th (or last, if less) line in files of a folder?

How big would a Daddy Longlegs Spider need to be to kill an average Human?

Does an object count as "being moved" when placed in a Bag of Holding before its wielder moves, and then after moving they take the object out again?

Why don't we use Cavea-B

How is "sein" conjugated in this sub-sentence?

Sleeping solo in a double sleeping bag

Do ability scores have any effect on casting Wish spell

If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?

How to persuade recruiters to send me the Job Description?

How do I make distance between concentric circles equal?

How to compare two different formulations of a problem?

Justifying the use of directed energy weapons

Brexit and backstop: would changes require unanimous approval by all EU countries? Does Ireland hold a veto?

Is it appropriate for a prospective landlord to ask me for my credit report?

How would a situation where rescue is impossible be handled by the crew?



Is it allowable to use an organization's name to publish a paper in a conference, even after I graduate from it?


Can I change my academic affiliation after a conference paper is accepted but before submitting the camera ready version?New author, independent research, scope of publishingWhere can I publish corrigenda for a conference paper?Is it possible to withdraw a conference paper after the rebuttal period?My PhD supervisor want to add his name on a paper from my MSc workIndicating work was performed as a student for alumniHow to withdraw ones name from an already published paperPublishing paper after graduation without advisor's name






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







10















I just graduated from my university, and I have a paper to submit to a conference. I was filling out the information to submit my work to them, but I am not sure what to put as my organization. Since I have now graduated from the university, can I still use their name to publish my work? If the answer is no, is there any solution to get my work published?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

    – Michael MacAskill
    yesterday


















10















I just graduated from my university, and I have a paper to submit to a conference. I was filling out the information to submit my work to them, but I am not sure what to put as my organization. Since I have now graduated from the university, can I still use their name to publish my work? If the answer is no, is there any solution to get my work published?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






















  • You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

    – Michael MacAskill
    yesterday














10












10








10


2






I just graduated from my university, and I have a paper to submit to a conference. I was filling out the information to submit my work to them, but I am not sure what to put as my organization. Since I have now graduated from the university, can I still use their name to publish my work? If the answer is no, is there any solution to get my work published?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I just graduated from my university, and I have a paper to submit to a conference. I was filling out the information to submit my work to them, but I am not sure what to put as my organization. Since I have now graduated from the university, can I still use their name to publish my work? If the answer is no, is there any solution to get my work published?







publications






share|improve this question









New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









bubbleking

1073 bronze badges




1073 bronze badges






New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked Aug 18 at 23:01









AbdullahAbdullah

511 silver badge3 bronze badges




511 silver badge3 bronze badges




New contributor



Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Abdullah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

    – Michael MacAskill
    yesterday



















  • You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

    – Michael MacAskill
    yesterday

















You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

– Michael MacAskill
yesterday





You should specify if you will have co-authors. Presumably at least one of those would be from your previous institution, which means it is no longer necessary to worry about the institution itself being worried in any way about being associated with the paper.

– Michael MacAskill
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















21













The affiliation to your name on a publication should reflect where most of the work was done and where most of the funding came from.



Scenario 1
You just graduated and you want to publish your results in a paper. The manuscript will be written after graduation, but essentially all the results come from pre-graduation work. The affiliation is clearly the university where you graduated.



Scenario 2
You just graduated and continue researching on the topic. The new paper is an extension of your previous work, but all the work has been done by you after graduation. The affiliation is clearly not the university where you graduated. All the previous work should be cited accordingly. You can submit a paper independently, but it will be easier with a university affiliation. Talk to your former supervisor for advice.



Scenario 3 (in between 1 and 2)
You just graduated and you did some new research after graduation. However, a non-neglible part of the manuscript is from before graduation. In this case, you should talk to your former supervisor and ask for their opinion. In my opinion, they will be more than happy to have the paper submitted under their affiliation.



This answer is an extension of what Vladimir F said in the comments.






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

    – PLL
    yesterday



















16













To broaden the answer a little. I am not aware of any university that requires approval prior to publication, but some organizations (e.g., US government labs) have policies regarding what work can be published and the steps the authors need to take regarding dissemination of the work. If your prior university/organization had such a policy, you should still follow them.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Same for coauthors, if any.

    – Alchimista
    2 days ago






  • 3





    I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

    – Gimelist
    2 days ago



















6













The affiliation can be the one that you are currently with (eg a company/new university), or the old one if you’re still looking around for a job. What’s important is that
a. You offer an email address that will be active for a reasonable amount of time.
b. That you mention that most of the work was done when you were in your former university.






share|improve this answer

































    4













    Both choices here could prove to be seriously wrong. If you use the affiliation, you could be seen as misrepresenting yourself and the institution. If you don't use it, you could be seen as failing to give credit where it is due (especially if you received funding or other support to perform the work that you are now publishing). So, the only correct course of action is to ask your former supervisor (or other appropriate contact) at the university, what you should do.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor



    sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

















    • 1





      Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

      – Underminer
      2 days ago











    • @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

      – sesquipedalias
      2 days ago



















    3













    One option would be to get a visitor or guest affiliation with your old university. These are usually easy to get, and my experience has been you just need to fill a form out with basic contact details. This let's you still put your old University as your affliaition. Usually you will also get to keep your old email address for another year which can be helpful as people don't always update their address books straight away.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















    • This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

      – senderle
      yesterday














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Abdullah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134856%2fis-it-allowable-to-use-an-organizations-name-to-publish-a-paper-in-a-conference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    21













    The affiliation to your name on a publication should reflect where most of the work was done and where most of the funding came from.



    Scenario 1
    You just graduated and you want to publish your results in a paper. The manuscript will be written after graduation, but essentially all the results come from pre-graduation work. The affiliation is clearly the university where you graduated.



    Scenario 2
    You just graduated and continue researching on the topic. The new paper is an extension of your previous work, but all the work has been done by you after graduation. The affiliation is clearly not the university where you graduated. All the previous work should be cited accordingly. You can submit a paper independently, but it will be easier with a university affiliation. Talk to your former supervisor for advice.



    Scenario 3 (in between 1 and 2)
    You just graduated and you did some new research after graduation. However, a non-neglible part of the manuscript is from before graduation. In this case, you should talk to your former supervisor and ask for their opinion. In my opinion, they will be more than happy to have the paper submitted under their affiliation.



    This answer is an extension of what Vladimir F said in the comments.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 5





      This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

      – PLL
      yesterday
















    21













    The affiliation to your name on a publication should reflect where most of the work was done and where most of the funding came from.



    Scenario 1
    You just graduated and you want to publish your results in a paper. The manuscript will be written after graduation, but essentially all the results come from pre-graduation work. The affiliation is clearly the university where you graduated.



    Scenario 2
    You just graduated and continue researching on the topic. The new paper is an extension of your previous work, but all the work has been done by you after graduation. The affiliation is clearly not the university where you graduated. All the previous work should be cited accordingly. You can submit a paper independently, but it will be easier with a university affiliation. Talk to your former supervisor for advice.



    Scenario 3 (in between 1 and 2)
    You just graduated and you did some new research after graduation. However, a non-neglible part of the manuscript is from before graduation. In this case, you should talk to your former supervisor and ask for their opinion. In my opinion, they will be more than happy to have the paper submitted under their affiliation.



    This answer is an extension of what Vladimir F said in the comments.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 5





      This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

      – PLL
      yesterday














    21












    21








    21







    The affiliation to your name on a publication should reflect where most of the work was done and where most of the funding came from.



    Scenario 1
    You just graduated and you want to publish your results in a paper. The manuscript will be written after graduation, but essentially all the results come from pre-graduation work. The affiliation is clearly the university where you graduated.



    Scenario 2
    You just graduated and continue researching on the topic. The new paper is an extension of your previous work, but all the work has been done by you after graduation. The affiliation is clearly not the university where you graduated. All the previous work should be cited accordingly. You can submit a paper independently, but it will be easier with a university affiliation. Talk to your former supervisor for advice.



    Scenario 3 (in between 1 and 2)
    You just graduated and you did some new research after graduation. However, a non-neglible part of the manuscript is from before graduation. In this case, you should talk to your former supervisor and ask for their opinion. In my opinion, they will be more than happy to have the paper submitted under their affiliation.



    This answer is an extension of what Vladimir F said in the comments.






    share|improve this answer













    The affiliation to your name on a publication should reflect where most of the work was done and where most of the funding came from.



    Scenario 1
    You just graduated and you want to publish your results in a paper. The manuscript will be written after graduation, but essentially all the results come from pre-graduation work. The affiliation is clearly the university where you graduated.



    Scenario 2
    You just graduated and continue researching on the topic. The new paper is an extension of your previous work, but all the work has been done by you after graduation. The affiliation is clearly not the university where you graduated. All the previous work should be cited accordingly. You can submit a paper independently, but it will be easier with a university affiliation. Talk to your former supervisor for advice.



    Scenario 3 (in between 1 and 2)
    You just graduated and you did some new research after graduation. However, a non-neglible part of the manuscript is from before graduation. In this case, you should talk to your former supervisor and ask for their opinion. In my opinion, they will be more than happy to have the paper submitted under their affiliation.



    This answer is an extension of what Vladimir F said in the comments.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    IanIan

    3,0661 gold badge11 silver badges32 bronze badges




    3,0661 gold badge11 silver badges32 bronze badges











    • 5





      This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

      – PLL
      yesterday














    • 5





      This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

      – PLL
      yesterday








    5




    5





    This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

    – PLL
    yesterday





    This is the main answer, but a small addendum: There are two different things a conference may want your affiliation for — for the publication, and for you as a conference participant (e.g. on your name badge). As this and other answers say, the “publication affiliation” is a bit subtle but could be either the old or the new. The “name badge” affiliation should generally be your current one, though, so even if they don’t already ask for e.g. “affiliation on publication” and “current affiliation” separately, I would recommend giving them both, with a note about the publication one.

    – PLL
    yesterday













    16













    To broaden the answer a little. I am not aware of any university that requires approval prior to publication, but some organizations (e.g., US government labs) have policies regarding what work can be published and the steps the authors need to take regarding dissemination of the work. If your prior university/organization had such a policy, you should still follow them.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Same for coauthors, if any.

      – Alchimista
      2 days ago






    • 3





      I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

      – Gimelist
      2 days ago
















    16













    To broaden the answer a little. I am not aware of any university that requires approval prior to publication, but some organizations (e.g., US government labs) have policies regarding what work can be published and the steps the authors need to take regarding dissemination of the work. If your prior university/organization had such a policy, you should still follow them.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Same for coauthors, if any.

      – Alchimista
      2 days ago






    • 3





      I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

      – Gimelist
      2 days ago














    16












    16








    16







    To broaden the answer a little. I am not aware of any university that requires approval prior to publication, but some organizations (e.g., US government labs) have policies regarding what work can be published and the steps the authors need to take regarding dissemination of the work. If your prior university/organization had such a policy, you should still follow them.






    share|improve this answer













    To broaden the answer a little. I am not aware of any university that requires approval prior to publication, but some organizations (e.g., US government labs) have policies regarding what work can be published and the steps the authors need to take regarding dissemination of the work. If your prior university/organization had such a policy, you should still follow them.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Aug 19 at 0:10









    StrongBadStrongBad

    91.5k25 gold badges227 silver badges446 bronze badges




    91.5k25 gold badges227 silver badges446 bronze badges











    • 1





      Same for coauthors, if any.

      – Alchimista
      2 days ago






    • 3





      I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

      – Gimelist
      2 days ago














    • 1





      Same for coauthors, if any.

      – Alchimista
      2 days ago






    • 3





      I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

      – Gimelist
      2 days ago








    1




    1





    Same for coauthors, if any.

    – Alchimista
    2 days ago





    Same for coauthors, if any.

    – Alchimista
    2 days ago




    3




    3





    I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

    – Gimelist
    2 days ago





    I am aware of such a university - my own. If you are not a current student supervised by permanent staff, permanent staff, or temporary staff on a >1 year contract, a "research committee" has to approve your use of the affiliation for a paper. If you publish in Science or Nature without asking first no one will care. The point of this is to stop people from publishing in very low IF journals as it takes the university's average down when considering how to distribute federal funding.

    – Gimelist
    2 days ago











    6













    The affiliation can be the one that you are currently with (eg a company/new university), or the old one if you’re still looking around for a job. What’s important is that
    a. You offer an email address that will be active for a reasonable amount of time.
    b. That you mention that most of the work was done when you were in your former university.






    share|improve this answer






























      6













      The affiliation can be the one that you are currently with (eg a company/new university), or the old one if you’re still looking around for a job. What’s important is that
      a. You offer an email address that will be active for a reasonable amount of time.
      b. That you mention that most of the work was done when you were in your former university.






      share|improve this answer




























        6












        6








        6







        The affiliation can be the one that you are currently with (eg a company/new university), or the old one if you’re still looking around for a job. What’s important is that
        a. You offer an email address that will be active for a reasonable amount of time.
        b. That you mention that most of the work was done when you were in your former university.






        share|improve this answer













        The affiliation can be the one that you are currently with (eg a company/new university), or the old one if you’re still looking around for a job. What’s important is that
        a. You offer an email address that will be active for a reasonable amount of time.
        b. That you mention that most of the work was done when you were in your former university.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 19 at 0:05









        SparkSpark

        8,7622 gold badges18 silver badges35 bronze badges




        8,7622 gold badges18 silver badges35 bronze badges


























            4













            Both choices here could prove to be seriously wrong. If you use the affiliation, you could be seen as misrepresenting yourself and the institution. If you don't use it, you could be seen as failing to give credit where it is due (especially if you received funding or other support to perform the work that you are now publishing). So, the only correct course of action is to ask your former supervisor (or other appropriate contact) at the university, what you should do.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • 1





              Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

              – Underminer
              2 days ago











            • @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

              – sesquipedalias
              2 days ago
















            4













            Both choices here could prove to be seriously wrong. If you use the affiliation, you could be seen as misrepresenting yourself and the institution. If you don't use it, you could be seen as failing to give credit where it is due (especially if you received funding or other support to perform the work that you are now publishing). So, the only correct course of action is to ask your former supervisor (or other appropriate contact) at the university, what you should do.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • 1





              Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

              – Underminer
              2 days ago











            • @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

              – sesquipedalias
              2 days ago














            4












            4








            4







            Both choices here could prove to be seriously wrong. If you use the affiliation, you could be seen as misrepresenting yourself and the institution. If you don't use it, you could be seen as failing to give credit where it is due (especially if you received funding or other support to perform the work that you are now publishing). So, the only correct course of action is to ask your former supervisor (or other appropriate contact) at the university, what you should do.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            Both choices here could prove to be seriously wrong. If you use the affiliation, you could be seen as misrepresenting yourself and the institution. If you don't use it, you could be seen as failing to give credit where it is due (especially if you received funding or other support to perform the work that you are now publishing). So, the only correct course of action is to ask your former supervisor (or other appropriate contact) at the university, what you should do.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago





















            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 2 days ago









            sesquipedaliassesquipedalias

            1494 bronze badges




            1494 bronze badges




            New contributor



            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            sesquipedalias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • 1





              Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

              – Underminer
              2 days ago











            • @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

              – sesquipedalias
              2 days ago














            • 1





              Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

              – Underminer
              2 days ago











            • @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

              – sesquipedalias
              2 days ago








            1




            1





            Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

            – Underminer
            2 days ago





            Unless the research is highly controversial, I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where listing the university affiliation would prove seriously wrong.

            – Underminer
            2 days ago













            @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

            – sesquipedalias
            2 days ago





            @Underminer if the author is no longer actually affiliated with the institution, the claim could be seen as dishonest -- and the work needn't be controversial for the institution to want to distance itself from it, it can simply be (considered to be) of poor quality

            – sesquipedalias
            2 days ago











            3













            One option would be to get a visitor or guest affiliation with your old university. These are usually easy to get, and my experience has been you just need to fill a form out with basic contact details. This let's you still put your old University as your affliaition. Usually you will also get to keep your old email address for another year which can be helpful as people don't always update their address books straight away.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            • This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

              – senderle
              yesterday
















            3













            One option would be to get a visitor or guest affiliation with your old university. These are usually easy to get, and my experience has been you just need to fill a form out with basic contact details. This let's you still put your old University as your affliaition. Usually you will also get to keep your old email address for another year which can be helpful as people don't always update their address books straight away.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            • This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

              – senderle
              yesterday














            3












            3








            3







            One option would be to get a visitor or guest affiliation with your old university. These are usually easy to get, and my experience has been you just need to fill a form out with basic contact details. This let's you still put your old University as your affliaition. Usually you will also get to keep your old email address for another year which can be helpful as people don't always update their address books straight away.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            One option would be to get a visitor or guest affiliation with your old university. These are usually easy to get, and my experience has been you just need to fill a form out with basic contact details. This let's you still put your old University as your affliaition. Usually you will also get to keep your old email address for another year which can be helpful as people don't always update their address books straight away.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 2 days ago









            RobRob

            311 bronze badge




            311 bronze badge




            New contributor



            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

              – senderle
              yesterday



















            • This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

              – senderle
              yesterday

















            This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

            – senderle
            yesterday





            This is such an ambiguous case that I can't imagine the OP running into any real trouble, whatever their decision. But this is the best approach IMO if there is any doubt. It may be easier at some institutions than others though.

            – senderle
            yesterday










            Abdullah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Abdullah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Abdullah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Abdullah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134856%2fis-it-allowable-to-use-an-organizations-name-to-publish-a-paper-in-a-conference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...