Mdthbs

It is difficult to tell why Johnson really does things, since he is a serial liar with opaque motives even by the low standards of British politics.

However, from various other public statements, we can work out Brexit doctrine. The belief seems to be that the EU is an asymmetric power structure with Germany on top and France second, and that all the other countries will be told what to do by them. This is part of the Brexit argument: since the UK is not running Europe, some other country must be, and this is intolerable.

The negotiation strategy will probably be the "they want to sell us cars" one for Germany, pointing out how many BMW sales are to the UK, and for France will likely center around the disruption at Calais.

Boris Johnson is a hard Brexiteer, he made no mystery of the fact that he is happy to make the UK leave the EU without a deal. Therefore his visits are not meant to convince anybody in the EU, especially since there's absolutely no indication at all that the EU would budge (quite the opposite). There's also no concrete indication of what he proposes instead of the backstop.

Boris Johnson's visits are very likely intended as part of a political plan in which:

• He appears to seek a new deal with the EU, but the EU refuses so he can paint them as the bad guys (in the very unlikely event of the EU accepting, this would be a heroic victory for him anyway)


• He appears as someone who doesn't compromise the interests of the UK, brave enough to take the risk of a hard Brexit. He probably wants to spin this as "the UK is ready to make sacrifices for its freedom", an idea which is reminiscent of the special role the UK had in World War II.


• If he manages to project this image, he can appeal to the patriotic values of all the UK nationals: "Unite behind me against the tyranny of the EU", something along these lines.


• As expected, the UK will crash out of the EU. Parliament elections are very likely to happen either shortly before or shortly after, and he hopes to capitalize on his image as a hero to win them.


• He might truly believe that his government will be able to obtain better trade deals with other countries after that (one may note the similarity with another president who was very confident about his own trade skills.

It is also worth mentioning that the EU designated a representative for the Brexit negotiations and insisted that the UK should deal with them and not with individual countries. So even if he really intended to re-negotiate, Boris Johnson would have no reason to visit every EU country.

I am not sure how seriously the question was asked, but anyway...

While the current POTUS made his first overseas visit in a form of a tour, starting from Saudi-Arabia, in many countries, typically [maybe also in this case with Mr. Trump...] the chosen destination of the first official foreign visit has symbolic importance, and often takes place to e.g. an important neighboring country. I would have thought that each "conventional" POTUS would first visit Canada, but after checking found out that actually e.g. George W. Bush visited first Mexico, and Canada came only second.

Yes, the EU currently requires unanimous decisions on many matters, which, some think, is a problem. But that does not mean that Boris Johnson is personally visiting each country with the purpose of negotiating Brexit with the leaders of each country. Also, while he will of course also be visiting other EU countries, there is no "ceremonial duty" to visit all of them once getting into office, and, he will have plenty of chances to meet everyone during the numerous summits he will attend regardless if/when Brexit finally happens.

You cannot really negotiate by Skype with 20-30 heads of state or government directly. The process set up by the EU (for Brexit but also for trade deals) is to appoint a negotiating team with an explicit mandate adopted by the 27. For internal negotiations, the work is prepared by bodies like the COREPER (where everybody is around the table but not necessarily fully equal in the discussion) and heads of government only get involved when everything is agreed (or perhaps a few contentious questions need a decision at the highest level).

In this context, it's important to remember that EU officials (Barnier - the EU's chief Brexit negotiator, Juncker, and Tusk) are generally presented as inflexible and uncooperative by leading conservative (especially pro-Brexit) policians. The UK has since the beginning of the process been trying to circumvent them (from the numerous public declarations on the German car industry to Theresa May “make me an offer“ discussions with Merkel). It would seem that Johnson is still trying a variant of this strategy or at least wants to be seen doing that.

There are also more practical considerations. British prime ministers often visit Germany and France (in that order) early on in their premiership (Brown took office on June 27, 2007, visited Germany on July 16; Cameron: May 11, 2010, trip to Germany and France on May 20-21; May: July 13, 2016 and July 20-21). Johnson also had to go to France for the G7 meeting so it only makes sense for all parties to add a one-to-one meeting with Macron to that trip and to go to Berlin first for balance. Anything else (not extending an invitation or refusing it) would be widely seen as a deliberate snub and undermine everybody's claim that they are still ready to make a deal and the other party is being unreasonable.

Finally, it's presumably not anyone's main focus under the circumstances but they would have many bilateral issues to discuss beside EU matters concerning all 27/28 members. Interestingly, it would even make sense if both parties had officially admited they are OK with no deal: some of the most critical border infrastructure for the UK are actually in France.

While Jontia's answer cover the main reason to discuss Brexit issues with Germany and France before other EU members, there is also another topic at hand: namely the G7 taking place at the end of this week in France.

The G7 consists of Canada, USA, Japan, UK, Germany, France and Italy. Italy is in a political limbo due to the resignation of Conte (Italy's Prime Minister). Thus meeting Merkel and Macron allows to address both the Brexit, European politics as well as prepare for the G7 meeting.

Whilst the other answers are correct in saying that France and Germany are important players in deciding whether there will be a new withdrawal agreement, there are other reasons for him to talk to those governments, even about Brexit.

For example, some things which are part of the withdrawal agreement now will become national competencies after a no-deal Brexit. UK citizens' rights in EU countries is one of those - EU countries mostly decide their non-EU visa policies independently, not collectively (including in Schengen countries when it comes to work visas).

Then there are things that are or are partly national competencies and not addressed in the withdrawal agreement. Freight vehicle traffic is one of these. There's an EU-level offer of allowing British lorries to pick up and drop off goods in the EU for nine months after a no-deal Brexit. After that it's known only that there's a Europe-level agreement (bigger than the EU) providing a small number of permits for UK lorries. The government's position on this appears to include trying to negotiate bilateral agreements on this to improve this situation.

Port and customs capacity is also important, so are fishing rights (French fishermen have threatened to disrupt port traffic if they can't access UK waters) as no doubt are many other things that are outside the withdrawal agreement.

In addition to what the other answers have said it is worth pointing out that Merkel and Macron are very well aware of what the rest of the EU countries are thinking about this. For instance, they know that there is no point making some deal which affects Gibraltar in a way that Spain would not allow even it would make no difference to France or Germany as individual countries.

They also know what went on during the nearly three years of negotiating up until this date and even though Johnson appears to want to ignore all of that he actually knows that he can't.

So, this isn't an attempt to negotiate with France and Germany independently but an effort to get an idea of that can and can't be done from two people who are very well positioned to know.

Because only Germany, France and Ireland have raised objections

It's likely due to the fact that Germany has aired opposition to scrapping the backstop, and France has threatened a perpetual temporary customs union backstop over a dispute regarding fishing rights. Besides Ireland, which Boris has also spoken with, and Spain, which the UK already reached an agreement with, there doesn't appear to be any other European countries airing opposition to a change in the deal regarding the backstop, so Boris doesn't need to visit any other EU countries.

To get a change through, however, Boris needs unanimous support (not simply a majority), so effectively, Germany, France and Ireland have a veto vote, and thus he must appeal to these countries directly in order to have a chance of getting the deal through.

In Boris' mind Germany and France are running the show. I suppose he believed a bit too much of his own nonsense, as it's the kind of thing he used to write about the EU when he was a journalist.

The conspiracy theory he pushed was that Germany and France were running the show and had all the power. Most assumed he knew he was lying, and perhaps he does... It could just be a stunt, all part of laying the blame for a no-deal crash at the feet of the EU.

It's also possible that having got nowhere with the Irish he is now looking for other options.