Volume of regular octahedronVolume of a parabolic solidWhy does rotating a cross sectional area result in a...
Can massive damage kill you while at 0 HP?
Can I bring alcohol to Dubai?
Scalar `new T` vs array `new T[1]`
This fell out of my toilet when I unscrewed the supply line. What is it?
How slow was the 6502 BASIC compared to Assembly
Why has Donald Trump's popularity remained so stable over a rather long period of time?
If LPG gas burners can reach temperatures above 1700 °C, then how do HCA and PAH not develop in extreme amounts during cooking?
Is there a magnetic attraction between two parallel electron beams?
Why didn't Trudy wear a breathing mask in Avatar?
How stable are PID loops really?
Describing the taste of food
Does the Creighton Method of Natural Family Planning have a failure rate of 3.2% or less?
Can a Dragon enter the feywild at will?
Rat proofing compost bin but allowing worms in
Can something have more sugar per 100g than the percentage of sugar that's in it?
What is the fastest way to move in Borderlands 3?
Understanding and grammar meaning behind "やったことないしなー"
Had there been instances of national states banning harmful imports before the mid-19th C Opium Wars?
A sentient carnivorous species trying to preserve life. How could they find a new food source?
Self-learning Calculus. Where does Lang's First Course in Calculus stay when compared to Apostol/Spivak/Courant
に vs. を in "to pass a test"
What kind of mission objective would make a parabolic escape trajectory desirable?
I pay for a service, but I miss the broadcast
How much money should I save in order to generate $1000/month for the rest of my life?
Volume of regular octahedron
Volume of a parabolic solidWhy does rotating a cross sectional area result in a different volume?Computing volume by cross section method.Volume of Solid, AB CalcFind the volume of the described solid $S$.Finding volume of a solidComputing Volume Using IntegrationVolume of a solid formed by a triangle base with square cross sections parallel to a lineInradius of an octahedronCalculus 2 Integration of area to find a volume
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}
$begingroup$
According to several sources on the internet, the volume of a regular octahedron with unit edge lengths is approximately 0.47. I haven't seen an explanation for why this is so yet. When I tried to figure the volume myself, I obtained a unit volume of 1/(sqrt(2)), which is approximately 0.71.
Let me explain my reasoning. If you take an octahedron, you can see it contains two squares on the vertical and horizontal axis (which are the base squares of the two pyramids it is made up of, depending on the angle you look at it at.) Each of these squares has an area of 1, since every line has a measure of 1 in a unit octahedron.
If you take a cross section of this octahedron parallel to one of these main squares, you will always get a similar square, because each vertex on the main square is equidistant to the other two vertexes in the octahedron.
Where the two main squares forming the octahedron intersect, the line is equal to the diagonal of a unit square, or the square root of 2.
Since all cross sections of the octahedron parallel to either of these squares are similar, we can therefore say that the relationship between the line on the base of any cross section and the area of the cross section is sqrt(2) (base line) to 1 (area), or a factor of 1/sqrt(2).
Extending this logic, we can multiply the area of the base square by this ratio to obtain the volume, which, because the area is 1, would be 1/sqrt(2) units cubed.
Where did I mess up my math reasoning?
volume fake-proofs solid-geometry platonic-solids
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
According to several sources on the internet, the volume of a regular octahedron with unit edge lengths is approximately 0.47. I haven't seen an explanation for why this is so yet. When I tried to figure the volume myself, I obtained a unit volume of 1/(sqrt(2)), which is approximately 0.71.
Let me explain my reasoning. If you take an octahedron, you can see it contains two squares on the vertical and horizontal axis (which are the base squares of the two pyramids it is made up of, depending on the angle you look at it at.) Each of these squares has an area of 1, since every line has a measure of 1 in a unit octahedron.
If you take a cross section of this octahedron parallel to one of these main squares, you will always get a similar square, because each vertex on the main square is equidistant to the other two vertexes in the octahedron.
Where the two main squares forming the octahedron intersect, the line is equal to the diagonal of a unit square, or the square root of 2.
Since all cross sections of the octahedron parallel to either of these squares are similar, we can therefore say that the relationship between the line on the base of any cross section and the area of the cross section is sqrt(2) (base line) to 1 (area), or a factor of 1/sqrt(2).
Extending this logic, we can multiply the area of the base square by this ratio to obtain the volume, which, because the area is 1, would be 1/sqrt(2) units cubed.
Where did I mess up my math reasoning?
volume fake-proofs solid-geometry platonic-solids
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
According to several sources on the internet, the volume of a regular octahedron with unit edge lengths is approximately 0.47. I haven't seen an explanation for why this is so yet. When I tried to figure the volume myself, I obtained a unit volume of 1/(sqrt(2)), which is approximately 0.71.
Let me explain my reasoning. If you take an octahedron, you can see it contains two squares on the vertical and horizontal axis (which are the base squares of the two pyramids it is made up of, depending on the angle you look at it at.) Each of these squares has an area of 1, since every line has a measure of 1 in a unit octahedron.
If you take a cross section of this octahedron parallel to one of these main squares, you will always get a similar square, because each vertex on the main square is equidistant to the other two vertexes in the octahedron.
Where the two main squares forming the octahedron intersect, the line is equal to the diagonal of a unit square, or the square root of 2.
Since all cross sections of the octahedron parallel to either of these squares are similar, we can therefore say that the relationship between the line on the base of any cross section and the area of the cross section is sqrt(2) (base line) to 1 (area), or a factor of 1/sqrt(2).
Extending this logic, we can multiply the area of the base square by this ratio to obtain the volume, which, because the area is 1, would be 1/sqrt(2) units cubed.
Where did I mess up my math reasoning?
volume fake-proofs solid-geometry platonic-solids
New contributor
$endgroup$
According to several sources on the internet, the volume of a regular octahedron with unit edge lengths is approximately 0.47. I haven't seen an explanation for why this is so yet. When I tried to figure the volume myself, I obtained a unit volume of 1/(sqrt(2)), which is approximately 0.71.
Let me explain my reasoning. If you take an octahedron, you can see it contains two squares on the vertical and horizontal axis (which are the base squares of the two pyramids it is made up of, depending on the angle you look at it at.) Each of these squares has an area of 1, since every line has a measure of 1 in a unit octahedron.
If you take a cross section of this octahedron parallel to one of these main squares, you will always get a similar square, because each vertex on the main square is equidistant to the other two vertexes in the octahedron.
Where the two main squares forming the octahedron intersect, the line is equal to the diagonal of a unit square, or the square root of 2.
Since all cross sections of the octahedron parallel to either of these squares are similar, we can therefore say that the relationship between the line on the base of any cross section and the area of the cross section is sqrt(2) (base line) to 1 (area), or a factor of 1/sqrt(2).
Extending this logic, we can multiply the area of the base square by this ratio to obtain the volume, which, because the area is 1, would be 1/sqrt(2) units cubed.
Where did I mess up my math reasoning?
volume fake-proofs solid-geometry platonic-solids
volume fake-proofs solid-geometry platonic-solids
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Electro-blob
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
Electro-blobElectro-blob
283 bronze badges
283 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The volume of a pyramid is $frac 13 hA$ where $h$ is the height and $A$ is the area of the base. Using this for two pyramids suck together gives me $frac{sqrt 2}3approx 0.47$ for a regular octagon of side $1$.
You are implicitly arguing that the volume of a pyramid is $frac 12 hA$ - I think you are applying two dimensional intuition to three dimensions. The area of a triangle is $frac 12 bh$ because the similar pieces diminish linearly if you draw lines parallel to the base. But the areas of the cross sections of the pyramid here are two-dimensional.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The height for half octahedron is
$$h=sqrt{1^2-left(frac{sqrt 2}2right)^2}=frac{sqrt 2}2$$
then
$$V=2cdotfrac13cdot 1cdot 1cdot h=frac23happrox 0.47$$
Here below a sketch for the derivation
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Electro-blob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3375877%2fvolume-of-regular-octahedron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The volume of a pyramid is $frac 13 hA$ where $h$ is the height and $A$ is the area of the base. Using this for two pyramids suck together gives me $frac{sqrt 2}3approx 0.47$ for a regular octagon of side $1$.
You are implicitly arguing that the volume of a pyramid is $frac 12 hA$ - I think you are applying two dimensional intuition to three dimensions. The area of a triangle is $frac 12 bh$ because the similar pieces diminish linearly if you draw lines parallel to the base. But the areas of the cross sections of the pyramid here are two-dimensional.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The volume of a pyramid is $frac 13 hA$ where $h$ is the height and $A$ is the area of the base. Using this for two pyramids suck together gives me $frac{sqrt 2}3approx 0.47$ for a regular octagon of side $1$.
You are implicitly arguing that the volume of a pyramid is $frac 12 hA$ - I think you are applying two dimensional intuition to three dimensions. The area of a triangle is $frac 12 bh$ because the similar pieces diminish linearly if you draw lines parallel to the base. But the areas of the cross sections of the pyramid here are two-dimensional.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The volume of a pyramid is $frac 13 hA$ where $h$ is the height and $A$ is the area of the base. Using this for two pyramids suck together gives me $frac{sqrt 2}3approx 0.47$ for a regular octagon of side $1$.
You are implicitly arguing that the volume of a pyramid is $frac 12 hA$ - I think you are applying two dimensional intuition to three dimensions. The area of a triangle is $frac 12 bh$ because the similar pieces diminish linearly if you draw lines parallel to the base. But the areas of the cross sections of the pyramid here are two-dimensional.
$endgroup$
The volume of a pyramid is $frac 13 hA$ where $h$ is the height and $A$ is the area of the base. Using this for two pyramids suck together gives me $frac{sqrt 2}3approx 0.47$ for a regular octagon of side $1$.
You are implicitly arguing that the volume of a pyramid is $frac 12 hA$ - I think you are applying two dimensional intuition to three dimensions. The area of a triangle is $frac 12 bh$ because the similar pieces diminish linearly if you draw lines parallel to the base. But the areas of the cross sections of the pyramid here are two-dimensional.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Mark BennetMark Bennet
87.3k9 gold badges93 silver badges197 bronze badges
87.3k9 gold badges93 silver badges197 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was about to say the same thing. The proof is fine up to “Extending this logic...”...because the logic doesn't extend.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The height for half octahedron is
$$h=sqrt{1^2-left(frac{sqrt 2}2right)^2}=frac{sqrt 2}2$$
then
$$V=2cdotfrac13cdot 1cdot 1cdot h=frac23happrox 0.47$$
Here below a sketch for the derivation
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The height for half octahedron is
$$h=sqrt{1^2-left(frac{sqrt 2}2right)^2}=frac{sqrt 2}2$$
then
$$V=2cdotfrac13cdot 1cdot 1cdot h=frac23happrox 0.47$$
Here below a sketch for the derivation
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The height for half octahedron is
$$h=sqrt{1^2-left(frac{sqrt 2}2right)^2}=frac{sqrt 2}2$$
then
$$V=2cdotfrac13cdot 1cdot 1cdot h=frac23happrox 0.47$$
Here below a sketch for the derivation
$endgroup$
The height for half octahedron is
$$h=sqrt{1^2-left(frac{sqrt 2}2right)^2}=frac{sqrt 2}2$$
then
$$V=2cdotfrac13cdot 1cdot 1cdot h=frac23happrox 0.47$$
Here below a sketch for the derivation
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
gimusigimusi
95.4k9 gold badges46 silver badges95 bronze badges
95.4k9 gold badges46 silver badges95 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Electro-blob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Electro-blob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Electro-blob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Electro-blob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3375877%2fvolume-of-regular-octahedron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It's implicit what is meant later in the question statement, but it might be useful to spell out that by "unit octahedron" you mean "octahedron with unit edge length" (as opposed to, say, meaning the circumscribing sphere has unit radius).
$endgroup$
– Travis
9 hours ago