How would you explain this difference in pointer to members of base and derived class using standard...
I have found ports on my Samsung smart tv running a display service. What can I do with it?
Why do you need to heat the pan before heating the olive oil?
What is this plant I saw for sale at a Romanian farmer's market?
In Street Fighter, what does the M stand for in M Bison?
How do you transpose samples in cents?
60's (or earlier) sci-fi short story about two spacecrafts exchanging plants for gold and thinking they got the better of the exchange
Is the author of the Shu"t HaRidvaz the same one as the one known to be the rebbe of the Ariza"l?
Counterfeit checks were created for my account. How does this type of fraud work?
Why does a Force divides equally on a Multiple Support/Legs?
How can I restore a master database from its bak file?
Justifying Affordable Bespoke Spaceships
Synaptic Static - when to roll the d6?
The Amazing Sliding Crossword
Are there examples of rowers who also fought?
Scaling an object to change its key
How would one carboxylate CBG into its acid form, CBGA?
Examples of protocols that are insecure when run concurrently
Math symbols in math operators
Parse JSON in LWC
How to modify a string without altering its text properties
How is the idea of "girlfriend material" naturally expressed in Russian?
sudo passwd username keeps asking for the current password
Why one uses 了 and the other one doesn’t?
Why things float in space, though there is always gravity of our star is present
How would you explain this difference in pointer to members of base and derived class using standard quotes?
How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Pointer to class data member “::*”Purpose of Unions in C and C++Pretty-print C++ STL containersEfficient unsigned-to-signed cast avoiding implementation-defined behaviorWhy is f(i = -1, i = -1) undefined behavior?Why does the C++ linker allow undefined functions?restrict a template function, to only allow certain typesConverting a pointer-to-member-of-base to a pointer-to-member-of-derivedDoes the C++ standard allow for an uninitialized bool to crash a program?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
demo:
#include<iostream>
struct A { int i = 10; };
struct B : A { };
int main(){
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
A a;
std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
B b;
std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';
}
The code prints
decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
10
decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
10
I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.
c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member
add a comment |
demo:
#include<iostream>
struct A { int i = 10; };
struct B : A { };
int main(){
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
A a;
std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
B b;
std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';
}
The code prints
decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
10
decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
10
I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.
c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member
add a comment |
demo:
#include<iostream>
struct A { int i = 10; };
struct B : A { };
int main(){
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
A a;
std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
B b;
std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';
}
The code prints
decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
10
decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
10
I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.
c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member
demo:
#include<iostream>
struct A { int i = 10; };
struct B : A { };
int main(){
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? " << std::boolalpha
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value << 'n'; //#1
A a;
std::cout << a.*(&A::i) << 'n';
std::cout << "decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? "
<< std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int B::*>::value << 'n'; //#2
B b;
std::cout << b.*(&B::i) << 'n';
}
The code prints
decltype(&B::i) == int A::* ? true
10
decltype(&B::i) == int B::* ? false
10
I used the example in [expr.unary.op]/3, where the standard says that the type of &B::i is int A::*, but that is not normative.
c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member
c++ language-lawyer pointer-to-member
edited 1 hour ago
Fabio Turati
2,75652542
2,75652542
asked 11 hours ago
AlexanderAlexander
985414
985414
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:
If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
mof some classCwith typeT, the result has type “pointer to member
of classCof typeT” and is a prvalue designatingC::m.
"Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test
std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value
According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some classCmeans .... The type of&B::iis thereforeint A::*.
– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56619345%2fhow-would-you-explain-this-difference-in-pointer-to-members-of-base-and-derived%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:
If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
mof some classCwith typeT, the result has type “pointer to member
of classCof typeT” and is a prvalue designatingC::m.
"Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test
std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value
According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some classCmeans .... The type of&B::iis thereforeint A::*.
– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
add a comment |
From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:
If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
mof some classCwith typeT, the result has type “pointer to member
of classCof typeT” and is a prvalue designatingC::m.
"Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test
std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value
According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some classCmeans .... The type of&B::iis thereforeint A::*.
– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
add a comment |
From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:
If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
mof some classCwith typeT, the result has type “pointer to member
of classCof typeT” and is a prvalue designatingC::m.
"Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test
std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value
According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.
From the paragraph you link to, emphasis mine:
If the operand is a qualified-id naming a non-static or variant member
mof some classCwith typeT, the result has type “pointer to member
of classCof typeT” and is a prvalue designatingC::m.
"Some class C" means it need not be the same class as the one mentioned by the qualified-id. In this case, i is a member of A, and remains a member of A even when named by &B::i. The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*, which you can verify by the test
std::is_same<decltype(&B::i), int A::*>::value
According to [class.qual]/1, member lookup follows the algorithm detailed in [class.member.lookup]. It is according to the rules there, which inspect the sub-object from which the member i comes from, that the class C is determined. Since i is a member of the sub-object A, the class of the pointer to member is determined to be A.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
112k17236303
112k17236303
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some classCmeans .... The type of&B::iis thereforeint A::*.
– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
add a comment |
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some classCmeans .... The type of&B::iis thereforeint A::*.
– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
To add some additional commentary: This follows on from the way that a pointer-to-member-of-base can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-member-of-derived (in contrast to the way that pointer-to-derived can be implicitly converted to pointer-to-base).
– Martin Bonner
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class
C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.– Alexander
11 hours ago
I'm not convinced by your conclusion: "Some class
C means .... The type of &B::i is therefore int A::*.– Alexander
11 hours ago
1
1
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
@Alexander - My conclusion is backed by the member lookup algorithm. And the wording of "some class" is not coincidental.
– StoryTeller
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56619345%2fhow-would-you-explain-this-difference-in-pointer-to-members-of-base-and-derived%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown