Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?Article II, section 2, clause 2; and listing(s) of relevent...

Why didn't he give Sam the antidote?

What if you can't publish in very high impact journal or top conference during your PhD?

Would it be easier to colonise a living world or a dead world?

Iron-age tools, is there a way to extract heavy metals out of a creature?

Postal services in Italy - Poste Italiane vs. Friendpost vs. GPS

Does UPDATE without WHERE clause lock a table in PostgreSQL?

How did the Fried Liver Attack get its name?

Would we have more than 8 minutes of light, if the sun "went out"?

How much money should I save in order to generate $1000/month for the rest of my life?

Why are engines with carburetors hard to start in cold weather?

Are Ground Crew Airline or Airport Personnel?

Why is there no logical not operator (!!) in C-style languages?

Relation between signal processing and control systems engineering?

Had there been instances of national states banning harmful imports before the mid-19th C Opium Wars?

Rat proofing compost bin but allowing worms in

If LPG gas burners can reach temperatures above 1700 °C, then how do HCA and PAH not develop in extreme amounts during cooking?

Goose Gone Fishing

How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game?

Python Bingo game that stores card in a dictionary

What kind of mission objective would make a parabolic escape trajectory desirable?

one-liner vs script

Scalar `new T` vs array `new T[1]`

How long could a human survive completely without the immune system?

How are steel imports supposed to threaten US national security?



Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?


Article II, section 2, clause 2; and listing(s) of relevent treatiesHow can international treaties like TTIP be secret and effective?What type of agreement is the Iran Nuclear Deal considered to be by non-US countries and how does that affect the agreement as a whole?Is the US unusually prone to walking away from signed treaties/accords?How many treaties ratified by Congress did the US exit unilaterally?What's the ratio of treaties ratified by Congress to other forms of international agreements the US is part of?“The Treaties” in article 50 of the Lisbon TreatyCan parties usually withdraw unilaterally from treaties? What's unusual about the binding nature of the “Irish backstop” in the Brexit agreement?Do all EU treaties cease to apply on exit day if no agreement is reached?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








6















Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?



For example, could an international agreement (treaty) be kept secret from the public?










share|improve this question






















  • 6





    I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

    – Dan Scally
    10 hours ago











  • I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago











  • According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

    – CGCampbell
    10 hours ago


















6















Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?



For example, could an international agreement (treaty) be kept secret from the public?










share|improve this question






















  • 6





    I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

    – Dan Scally
    10 hours ago











  • I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago











  • According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

    – CGCampbell
    10 hours ago














6












6








6








Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?



For example, could an international agreement (treaty) be kept secret from the public?










share|improve this question
















Is the text of all UK treaties and laws public?



For example, could an international agreement (treaty) be kept secret from the public?







united-kingdom law treaty






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Martin Schröder

1,9712 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges




1,9712 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges










asked 10 hours ago









BenBen

5,3471 gold badge24 silver badges65 bronze badges




5,3471 gold badge24 silver badges65 bronze badges











  • 6





    I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

    – Dan Scally
    10 hours ago











  • I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago











  • According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

    – CGCampbell
    10 hours ago














  • 6





    I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

    – Dan Scally
    10 hours ago











  • I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago











  • According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

    – CGCampbell
    10 hours ago








6




6





I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

– Dan Scally
10 hours ago





I think the only possible answer to this question is; "we don't know". If it were legal for a law to be kept secret, presumably that principle would be applied to the legislation authorising the secrecy itself.

– Dan Scally
10 hours ago













I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

– Ben
10 hours ago





I suppose you wouldn't know until such a law was broken?

– Ben
10 hours ago













According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

– CGCampbell
10 hours ago





According to the Wikipedia description of POPS (private ownership of public spaces), pretty much all of the information pertaining to POPS is not released to the public. The laws itself, however, seems to be public.

– CGCampbell
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9
















Laws



As far as I know, all UK laws are "acts of Parliament" which means they are debated in Parliament and these debates are recorded in Hansard. All acts of Parliament are in public records and all those made in the last 200 years are available online.



Anything from 1327 is accessible in the National Archives




Parliament rolls (1327–2005)



Browse Discovery, our catalogue, for enrolled copies of public acts, and a number of private acts, between 1327 and 2005 in C 65. Some of the original documents are in Latin, Anglo-Norman or Medieval French, but texts and translations have been published on the Parliament Rolls website.






Treaties



Before 2010



As Wikipedia puts it




the Treaty of London, 1915, was a secret pact between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Italy.



Many provisions of the pact were meant to be kept secret, until the conclusion of the war, but were published by the Bolsheviks when they came to power in Russia in late 1917.




So, at least in time of war, it was possible for at least some of the contents of treaties to be kept secret for at least a year or so.



You can see this Declaration between Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia, declaring that the Declaration of the same date engaging not to Conclude a Separate Peace during the course of the European War shall remain secret



Since 2010



According to a UK government website




Since 2010 it is a statutory legal requirement for the government to lay treaties which the UK has signed subject to ratification or its equivalent, or to which it intends to become party by accession, before both Houses of Parliament.




I think this means that secret treaties are either impossible or more difficult.



E.g. See UKUSA released 2010.






share|improve this answer




























  • Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

    – Martin Schröder
    5 hours ago











  • @Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

    – RedGrittyBrick
    3 hours ago













  • Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

    – James K
    3 hours ago



















4
















Yes. There's no such a thing as a secret law in a democracy that follows the rule of law, and secret treaties have been in general decline since the League of Nations. Neither are compatible with the public scrutiny you'd expect in a democracy.






share|improve this answer


























  • TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    @Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

    – divibisan
    10 hours ago











  • @divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    9 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago











  • "It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    7 hours ago















Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46123%2fis-the-text-of-all-uk-treaties-and-laws-public%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9
















Laws



As far as I know, all UK laws are "acts of Parliament" which means they are debated in Parliament and these debates are recorded in Hansard. All acts of Parliament are in public records and all those made in the last 200 years are available online.



Anything from 1327 is accessible in the National Archives




Parliament rolls (1327–2005)



Browse Discovery, our catalogue, for enrolled copies of public acts, and a number of private acts, between 1327 and 2005 in C 65. Some of the original documents are in Latin, Anglo-Norman or Medieval French, but texts and translations have been published on the Parliament Rolls website.






Treaties



Before 2010



As Wikipedia puts it




the Treaty of London, 1915, was a secret pact between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Italy.



Many provisions of the pact were meant to be kept secret, until the conclusion of the war, but were published by the Bolsheviks when they came to power in Russia in late 1917.




So, at least in time of war, it was possible for at least some of the contents of treaties to be kept secret for at least a year or so.



You can see this Declaration between Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia, declaring that the Declaration of the same date engaging not to Conclude a Separate Peace during the course of the European War shall remain secret



Since 2010



According to a UK government website




Since 2010 it is a statutory legal requirement for the government to lay treaties which the UK has signed subject to ratification or its equivalent, or to which it intends to become party by accession, before both Houses of Parliament.




I think this means that secret treaties are either impossible or more difficult.



E.g. See UKUSA released 2010.






share|improve this answer




























  • Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

    – Martin Schröder
    5 hours ago











  • @Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

    – RedGrittyBrick
    3 hours ago













  • Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

    – James K
    3 hours ago
















9
















Laws



As far as I know, all UK laws are "acts of Parliament" which means they are debated in Parliament and these debates are recorded in Hansard. All acts of Parliament are in public records and all those made in the last 200 years are available online.



Anything from 1327 is accessible in the National Archives




Parliament rolls (1327–2005)



Browse Discovery, our catalogue, for enrolled copies of public acts, and a number of private acts, between 1327 and 2005 in C 65. Some of the original documents are in Latin, Anglo-Norman or Medieval French, but texts and translations have been published on the Parliament Rolls website.






Treaties



Before 2010



As Wikipedia puts it




the Treaty of London, 1915, was a secret pact between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Italy.



Many provisions of the pact were meant to be kept secret, until the conclusion of the war, but were published by the Bolsheviks when they came to power in Russia in late 1917.




So, at least in time of war, it was possible for at least some of the contents of treaties to be kept secret for at least a year or so.



You can see this Declaration between Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia, declaring that the Declaration of the same date engaging not to Conclude a Separate Peace during the course of the European War shall remain secret



Since 2010



According to a UK government website




Since 2010 it is a statutory legal requirement for the government to lay treaties which the UK has signed subject to ratification or its equivalent, or to which it intends to become party by accession, before both Houses of Parliament.




I think this means that secret treaties are either impossible or more difficult.



E.g. See UKUSA released 2010.






share|improve this answer




























  • Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

    – Martin Schröder
    5 hours ago











  • @Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

    – RedGrittyBrick
    3 hours ago













  • Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

    – James K
    3 hours ago














9














9










9









Laws



As far as I know, all UK laws are "acts of Parliament" which means they are debated in Parliament and these debates are recorded in Hansard. All acts of Parliament are in public records and all those made in the last 200 years are available online.



Anything from 1327 is accessible in the National Archives




Parliament rolls (1327–2005)



Browse Discovery, our catalogue, for enrolled copies of public acts, and a number of private acts, between 1327 and 2005 in C 65. Some of the original documents are in Latin, Anglo-Norman or Medieval French, but texts and translations have been published on the Parliament Rolls website.






Treaties



Before 2010



As Wikipedia puts it




the Treaty of London, 1915, was a secret pact between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Italy.



Many provisions of the pact were meant to be kept secret, until the conclusion of the war, but were published by the Bolsheviks when they came to power in Russia in late 1917.




So, at least in time of war, it was possible for at least some of the contents of treaties to be kept secret for at least a year or so.



You can see this Declaration between Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia, declaring that the Declaration of the same date engaging not to Conclude a Separate Peace during the course of the European War shall remain secret



Since 2010



According to a UK government website




Since 2010 it is a statutory legal requirement for the government to lay treaties which the UK has signed subject to ratification or its equivalent, or to which it intends to become party by accession, before both Houses of Parliament.




I think this means that secret treaties are either impossible or more difficult.



E.g. See UKUSA released 2010.






share|improve this answer















Laws



As far as I know, all UK laws are "acts of Parliament" which means they are debated in Parliament and these debates are recorded in Hansard. All acts of Parliament are in public records and all those made in the last 200 years are available online.



Anything from 1327 is accessible in the National Archives




Parliament rolls (1327–2005)



Browse Discovery, our catalogue, for enrolled copies of public acts, and a number of private acts, between 1327 and 2005 in C 65. Some of the original documents are in Latin, Anglo-Norman or Medieval French, but texts and translations have been published on the Parliament Rolls website.






Treaties



Before 2010



As Wikipedia puts it




the Treaty of London, 1915, was a secret pact between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Italy.



Many provisions of the pact were meant to be kept secret, until the conclusion of the war, but were published by the Bolsheviks when they came to power in Russia in late 1917.




So, at least in time of war, it was possible for at least some of the contents of treaties to be kept secret for at least a year or so.



You can see this Declaration between Great Britain, France, Italy and Russia, declaring that the Declaration of the same date engaging not to Conclude a Separate Peace during the course of the European War shall remain secret



Since 2010



According to a UK government website




Since 2010 it is a statutory legal requirement for the government to lay treaties which the UK has signed subject to ratification or its equivalent, or to which it intends to become party by accession, before both Houses of Parliament.




I think this means that secret treaties are either impossible or more difficult.



E.g. See UKUSA released 2010.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









RedGrittyBrickRedGrittyBrick

5,9162 gold badges20 silver badges38 bronze badges




5,9162 gold badges20 silver badges38 bronze badges
















  • Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

    – Martin Schröder
    5 hours ago











  • @Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

    – RedGrittyBrick
    3 hours ago













  • Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

    – James K
    3 hours ago



















  • Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

    – Martin Schröder
    5 hours ago











  • @Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

    – RedGrittyBrick
    3 hours ago













  • Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

    – James K
    3 hours ago

















Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

– Martin Schröder
5 hours ago





Can I please see all treaties governing the cooperation between NSA and GHCQ?

– Martin Schröder
5 hours ago













@Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

– RedGrittyBrick
3 hours ago







@Martin - you mean this sort of thing?

– RedGrittyBrick
3 hours ago















Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

– James K
3 hours ago





Many "laws" (especially in contract law, as opposed to criminal law) are common laws, based on on acts of Parliament, but precedent of previous courts. While these precedents are all public, it may be difficult to get "the text of the law".

– James K
3 hours ago













4
















Yes. There's no such a thing as a secret law in a democracy that follows the rule of law, and secret treaties have been in general decline since the League of Nations. Neither are compatible with the public scrutiny you'd expect in a democracy.






share|improve this answer


























  • TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    @Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

    – divibisan
    10 hours ago











  • @divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    9 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago











  • "It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    7 hours ago


















4
















Yes. There's no such a thing as a secret law in a democracy that follows the rule of law, and secret treaties have been in general decline since the League of Nations. Neither are compatible with the public scrutiny you'd expect in a democracy.






share|improve this answer


























  • TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    @Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

    – divibisan
    10 hours ago











  • @divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    9 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago











  • "It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    7 hours ago
















4














4










4









Yes. There's no such a thing as a secret law in a democracy that follows the rule of law, and secret treaties have been in general decline since the League of Nations. Neither are compatible with the public scrutiny you'd expect in a democracy.






share|improve this answer













Yes. There's no such a thing as a secret law in a democracy that follows the rule of law, and secret treaties have been in general decline since the League of Nations. Neither are compatible with the public scrutiny you'd expect in a democracy.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

25.5k5 gold badges72 silver badges103 bronze badges




25.5k5 gold badges72 silver badges103 bronze badges
















  • TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    @Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

    – divibisan
    10 hours ago











  • @divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    9 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago











  • "It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    7 hours ago





















  • TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

    – Ben
    10 hours ago








  • 7





    @Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

    – divibisan
    10 hours ago











  • @divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    9 hours ago











  • @DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago











  • "It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    7 hours ago



















TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

– Ben
10 hours ago







TTIP (which presumably was a treaty) had secret elements. How does this fit in to your answer?

– Ben
10 hours ago






7




7





@Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

– divibisan
10 hours ago





@Ben Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that those elements were only secret during negotiations to allow negotiation without political pressure. Once the final text was agreed upon, then it would become public when it was sent to the Legislature for ratification. So, while the negotiations were secret, the final treaty would not have been.

– divibisan
10 hours ago













@divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

– Denis de Bernardy
9 hours ago





@divibisan: I seem to remember that they were accused of negotiating in secret so that there wouldn't be any public scrutiny on what lobbyists were up to until the ship had sailed.

– Denis de Bernardy
9 hours ago













@DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

– divibisan
7 hours ago





@DenisdeBernardy It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists: in any negotiation, every side is going to have to make some concessions, but every concession is going to spark protests from a different group of well-funded lobbyists whose only goal is to prevent any concessions that would hurt their industry. In that climate, it would be impossible to actually negotiate anything. By waiting until the whole thing is done to reveal it, the hope is that critics can weight the whole thing together and the industries that are helped will cancel out the ones that might be hurt

– divibisan
7 hours ago













"It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago







"It's just as much to protect the negotiations from lobbyists" -- Oh come on, let's get real here. :) Lobbyists have the ear of decision makers a lot more than the public does. And I also recollect leaks coming out of industry groups at the time (and much more rarely, out of activist groups), which suggests that papers were getting funneled to lobbyists a lot more than elsewhere. As to "the hopes is that critics can weigh the whole thing together" that doesn't pass a sniff test if you've ever been near democratic processes in action. The way to get buy-in is to explain along the way.

– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago





















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46123%2fis-the-text-of-all-uk-treaties-and-laws-public%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...